<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Galaxy S II is better? T-Mobile&#8217;s vs. AT&amp;T&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/#comment-786005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 04:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=418416#comment-786005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my T-Mobile Galaxy S II has Google Talk....w/ the latest update that pushed thru automatically around the 15th of December]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my T-Mobile Galaxy S II has Google Talk&#8230;.w/ the latest update that pushed thru automatically around the 15th of December</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladykid</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/#comment-782813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ladykid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 14:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=418416#comment-782813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks so much for this. You made my xmas decision easier. Happppppy holidays.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for this. You made my xmas decision easier. Happppppy holidays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/#comment-780084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=418416#comment-780084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so do u get 4g speeds on tmobile network with the att galaxy s ll?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so do u get 4g speeds on tmobile network with the att galaxy s ll?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/#comment-760453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=418416#comment-760453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually to me the t-mobile galaxy s2 looks clearer and more vivid, for example the picture with the boat and bridge looks clearer on t-mobile version and the red on the boat pops out more to me than the at&amp;t version. Just my opinion though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually to me the t-mobile galaxy s2 looks clearer and more vivid, for example the picture with the boat and bridge looks clearer on t-mobile version and the red on the boat pops out more to me than the at&amp;t version. Just my opinion though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linuxfreak</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/#comment-750179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[linuxfreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=418416#comment-750179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes it will, I have a att gs2 and works fine. Btw the att version of the Samsung gs2 running exynos cortex a9 beats Tmo&#039;s Qualcomms version, of course both run on the ARM-7 architecture. And both beat the Apples iDont 3-4s as it is a Samsung ARM7 processor underclocked to 800MHZ! Why?. I run the At&amp;t ver. rooted,running Cyanogen 7 on Tmo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it will, I have a att gs2 and works fine. Btw the att version of the Samsung gs2 running exynos cortex a9 beats Tmo&#8217;s Qualcomms version, of course both run on the ARM-7 architecture. And both beat the Apples iDont 3-4s as it is a Samsung ARM7 processor underclocked to 800MHZ! Why?. I run the At&amp;t ver. rooted,running Cyanogen 7 on Tmo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/#comment-742694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=418416#comment-742694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly no, there&#039;s no software fix since it&#039;s a hardware problem. :( Glad to help!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly no, there&#8217;s no software fix since it&#8217;s a hardware problem. :( Glad to help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/#comment-742398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=418416#comment-742398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah! so no software fix around this, huh? 
Thank you for the clear explanation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah! so no software fix around this, huh?<br />
Thank you for the clear explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/#comment-742168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=418416#comment-742168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlocked AT&amp;T phones will work on T-Mobile for voice because the two carriers generally use the same GSM frequencies for voice. But for high speed data, they use different frequencies. Without 1700 MHz support in the phone, you&#039;ll be stuck on EDGE speeds with a T-Mobile SIM. People who buy unlocked iPhones -- or buy an AT&amp;T iPhone and then unlock or jailbreak it -- have the same experience: voice is fine, but data is EDGE only because of no 1700 MHz support.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlocked AT&amp;T phones will work on T-Mobile for voice because the two carriers generally use the same GSM frequencies for voice. But for high speed data, they use different frequencies. Without 1700 MHz support in the phone, you&#8217;ll be stuck on EDGE speeds with a T-Mobile SIM. People who buy unlocked iPhones &#8212; or buy an AT&amp;T iPhone and then unlock or jailbreak it &#8212; have the same experience: voice is fine, but data is EDGE only because of no 1700 MHz support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/#comment-741945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=418416#comment-741945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haven&#039;t gotten back to it so I don&#039;t know about the exact frequencies--but it must have 1700, bc/ I am able to make calls from it on Tmobile. Also, data works, with &quot;E&quot; (which I understand is EDGE) on statusbar. 
Question is-- why not 4G?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t gotten back to it so I don&#8217;t know about the exact frequencies&#8211;but it must have 1700, bc/ I am able to make calls from it on Tmobile. Also, data works, with &#8220;E&#8221; (which I understand is EDGE) on statusbar.<br />
Question is&#8211; why not 4G?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/10/galaxy-s-2-comparison-att-tmobile/#comment-740781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=418416#comment-740781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For an unlocked AT&amp;T phone to work on T-Mobile&#039;s mobile broadband network, the phone must support the 1700 MHz frequency. You can check on the box to see if the phone does. Unfortunately, if you bought the phone from AT&amp;T, it&#039;s highly unlikely this frequency is supported. In the case of the Galaxy S II, the model sold overseas -- in Europe, for example -- would work on T-Mobile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an unlocked AT&amp;T phone to work on T-Mobile&#8217;s mobile broadband network, the phone must support the 1700 MHz frequency. You can check on the box to see if the phone does. Unfortunately, if you bought the phone from AT&amp;T, it&#8217;s highly unlikely this frequency is supported. In the case of the Galaxy S II, the model sold overseas &#8212; in Europe, for example &#8212; would work on T-Mobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
