<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung to file for multiple injunctions against iPhone 4S</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/10/05/samsung-to-file-for-multiple-injunctions-against-iphone-4s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/05/samsung-to-file-for-multiple-injunctions-against-iphone-4s/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:40:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: applefud</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/05/samsung-to-file-for-multiple-injunctions-against-iphone-4s/#comment-661880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[applefud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=415757#comment-661880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if people think samsung is violating FRAND then they didn&#039;t read the court transcripts, they&#039;ve been trying to get apple to license the IP for some time and apple has blatantly refused. . . same as they did with nokia.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if people think samsung is violating FRAND then they didn&#8217;t read the court transcripts, they&#8217;ve been trying to get apple to license the IP for some time and apple has blatantly refused. . . same as they did with nokia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atul Chitnis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/05/samsung-to-file-for-multiple-injunctions-against-iphone-4s/#comment-661777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atul Chitnis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=415757#comment-661777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And let&#039;s not forget who owns almost all important 4G patents now, and who probably deliberately delayed a 4G-capable phone to next year (when 4G will be more widespread). I suspect that Samsung bit of WAY more than they can chew by violating the FRAND rules :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And let&#8217;s not forget who owns almost all important 4G patents now, and who probably deliberately delayed a 4G-capable phone to next year (when 4G will be more widespread). I suspect that Samsung bit of WAY more than they can chew by violating the FRAND rules :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
