10 Comments

Summary:

Although the new iPod nano took a back seat to the iPhone 4S and iOS 5, it did gain a software update and could morph into a smartwatch of the future. Should competing products such as the MetaWatch and Live View be worried? Not just yet.

ipod-nano-watch

A slightly improved iPod nano took a back seat to the iPhone 4S and iOS 5 announcements at Tuesday’s Apple event. The small touchscreen music player sees a price drop on both the 8 GB and 16 GB models, but looks identical to last year’s model, just like the new iPhone 4S resembles the iPhone 4. Apple’s newest nano does gain a software update bringing it one small step closer to being a smartwatch.

I’ve been following the market for wearable displays and smartwatches for some time now. These small devices either act as remote displays that interact with your smartphone over a wireless connection or have smartphone guts of their own. With them, you can run apps, manage messages, check your calendar or view the weather, for example. My first foray in this area was back in 2004 with a Microsoft SPOT watch; it used FM radio waves to shoot news updates, text messages, event notifications and weather to my wrist. The service was quickly leapfrogged by smartphones and cellular wireless technology.

More recently, I tried a Sony Ericsson(eric) Live View watch, but it lost connectivity to my Android handset far too much. The MetaWatch prototype I reviewed back in June worked far better and is a reliable solution. And the folks at WIMM Labs are working on a wearable touchscreen device based on Android that has Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS and various other sensors.

The new nano can’t do nearly as much as these devices. With the software update, it gains new watch faces. The integrated accelerometer can measure how far and fast you run or walk; there’s no external Nike+ sensor needed. Since the device has no wireless radio, you’ll need to physically connect the nano to a computer for offloading the Nike+ data. And you can’t run third-party apps, so you can use any exercise software you want, provided it’s Nike+.

Now Apple isn’t positioning the nano as a smartwatch. But I could easily see the nano slowly morph into one with incremental upgrades. For the mass market audience, there isn’t yet a market for smartwatches. Few see the need, as they get all the information they need from a smartphone. But I see future merit in this market. Being able to triage or manage email and messages with a glance at the MetaWatch on my wrist is a huge time saver that doesn’t require me to pull out and power on a smartphone, and as we depend more on mobile devices, that’ll become increasingly important.

If this market does gain traction, I’d expect Apple to leverage the nano and iOS. Similar to past approaches with other products, Apple would likely create a smartwatch based on what it feels consumers need most in a wearable device. And because so few consumers are thinking about a product like this, it would be perceived as magical and revolutionary, much like the iPad is, despite the earlier presence of other consumer tablets.

For those currently developing smartwatches, there’s no immediate danger for two reasons. First, the nano isn’t yet a serious threat. Second, all the existing smartwatch efforts are based on Google Android; they don’t connect to iOS devices. That means as long as Android is around and popular — a safe bet — they can continue to mature their products for non-iOS users. But for those that have Apple products, the only smartwatch likely to connect to an iPhone is going to come from Apple, likely in the form of a nano successor.

  1. I wish the nano had 32gb of storage — i’d buy it in a second.

    Share
  2. I’m thinking in a few years they’ll be able to integrate Siri in this type of wearable iThing. That would make the device a lot more useful without having to add a hard or soft keyboard.

    Share
    1. Great point Joe, and it would address one of the biggest challenges to a small screen smartwatch: input and output methods.

      Share
      1. Exactly. An intermediate solution could be an ‘iPhone aware’ watch type device, that enables a link to the iPhone in your pocked for the heavy lifting required for Siri. Not sure if Apple would ever go for such a ‘kludgy’ solution, but at least it would be technologically feasible (simple even) in the near term.

        Share
    2. That was exactly what I was thinking as I read that, I’ve thought for some years voice control would provide the missing link to reduce electronic device sizes. The nano also benefits from Apple’s headphones with built in microphone.

      Share
  3. It’s too bad they didn’t update the Nano with a Bluetooth radio; that would let it act as a notification display and a remote for the iPhone. (Watch flashes when you get a social networking update or email, has an app to control music playback…)

    Share
  4. Apple should allow people (developers) to create their own watch faces. Check out the HD3 Slyde. I could save about $6500 if I bought a nano instead of the HD3 Slyde.

    Share
    1. I fully agree, and it would be a good App Store money maker!

      Share
  5. Loop Attachment Co. Thursday, October 6, 2011

    For those who are interested in a nano watchband, we encourage you to check out our product, the Loop Nano! We guarantee you it will make a perfect companion to your Mickey Mouse Clockface: http://bit.ly/pmYh85

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post