Comments on: How Stipple wants to shake up stock photos http://gigaom.com/2011/09/23/stipple-marketplace-stock-photos/ Thu, 23 May 2013 21:22:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Rawporter http://gigaom.com/2011/09/23/stipple-marketplace-stock-photos/#comment-657812 Sat, 24 Sep 2011 03:15:54 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=410762#comment-657812 We’ll be working through some different options as well… time to mix it up.

]]> By: Rey Flemings http://gigaom.com/2011/09/23/stipple-marketplace-stock-photos/#comment-657759 Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:07:17 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=410762#comment-657759 Hi William,

The photographer always earns revenue when using Stipple.

]]> By: David http://gigaom.com/2011/09/23/stipple-marketplace-stock-photos/#comment-657722 Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:33:08 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=410762#comment-657722 Getty Owes iStockPhoto.com, bought them in 2006 for 50 million. Since then their prices have tripled.

]]> By: Tom Mickelson http://gigaom.com/2011/09/23/stipple-marketplace-stock-photos/#comment-657717 Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:07:21 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=410762#comment-657717 Agreed that there are more than two options — after all, look at the photo that accompanies this article, a freebie via Flickr user Lollyknit. There are more options for photographers and publishers now than ever, though obviously not all options are created as equals.

]]> By: Josh Grossman http://gigaom.com/2011/09/23/stipple-marketplace-stock-photos/#comment-657713 Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:50:56 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=410762#comment-657713 It’s completely false that publishers only have 2 choices: Take a picture themselves, or license one from a stock photo provider like Getty Images. There are many services that offer cheap or free images to use including IStockPhoto.com, 123RF.com, and FreeDigitalPhotos.net

]]> By: William Beem http://gigaom.com/2011/09/23/stipple-marketplace-stock-photos/#comment-657705 Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:19:50 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=410762#comment-657705 So nobody pays the photographer who creates the photo? Yeah, that’ll work.

]]>