4 Comments

Summary:

The attorneys general of seven states joined the Justice Department’s suit today to block AT&T’s proposed buy of T-Mobile, citing worries about competition. Together these state represent a third of the American population. So what does that mean for the deal?

newatt

The attorneys general of seven states today joined the Justice Department’s suit to block AT&T’s proposed buy of T-Mobile, citing worries about competition. California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Washington joined the DoJ suit, apparently agreeing that the deal stymies competition.

Together, these state represent a third of the American population. The addition of the attorneys general to the lawsuit comes one day after members of Congress wrote to President Obama, asking him to approve the deal. AT&T sent the following statement:

It is not unusual for state attorneys general to participate in DoJ merger review proceedings or court filings. At the same time, we appreciate that 11 state attorneys general and hundreds of other local, state and federal officials are publicly supportive of our merger. We will continue to seek an expedited hearing on the DOJ’s complaint. On a parallel path, we have been and remain interested in a solution that addresses the DOJ’s issues with the T-Mobile merger.

We remain confident that we’ll reach a successful conclusion and look forward to delivering the merger benefits of additional wireless network capacity to improve customer service, expanded LTE deployment to 55 million more Americans, $8 billion in additional investment, and a commitment to bring 5,000 wireless call center jobs back to the United States.

AT&T responded last week to the DoJ lawsuit, arguing that the DoJ is wrong, and has vowed to fight for its right to buy T-Mobile. As of now, the attorneys general piling on is one of several continuing blows to the nation’s No. 2 carrier as it seeks to swallow its smaller rival. Even stalwart AT&T supporters, such as industry analyst Craig Moffet, are questioning whether or not Ma Bell can prevail against the DoJ. On the other hand, a Standard and Poor’s analyst seems to think it’s still going to happen.

If the deal falls through, all eyes will turn toward T-Mobile’s future as an independent company, or as a buyout target for Sprint or a private equity firm.

Chetan Sharma, an industry analyst told me last week that consolidation is inevitable in the telecommunications sector, and the DoJ lawsuit means that neither AT&T nor Verizon could go shopping for a big deal (although maybe they can pick up smaller assets). So, while consumers may rejoice, it’s still not clear that T-Mobile, or U.S. mobile broadband competition is out of the woods yet.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. I’m not convinced it’s DOA. While Obama’s DoJ has filed the suit, Obama has, on EVERY issue that he has been challenged on by Republicans and over-lobbied Democrats, caved. He has thrown the environment under the bus because people are calling the EPA anti-business. The pressure to allow this merger will be intense – it’s not just that ATT needs to kill off T-Mobile’s low cost/better service competition, but that ATT will owe DT about $6 billion in cash and other considerations if the deal falls through. They are just not going to give up that easily, so I would say there is still a good chance that ATT will throw the DoJ a few bones (hey, we’ll sell 10% of T-Mo’s subscribers to small carriers) and Obama will claim victory for the consumer and settle. After all, the DoJ said they are willing to discuss a “settlement” with ATT.

    There is nothing to settle. No deal should be allowed. ATT, give up on this and go back to selling second world service at luxury prices, and use the usual tactics of fear, uncertainty, and doubt to compete with T-Mobile and Sprint. You will still have your illegal bundling of telecom equipment and service to keep customers locked in.

    But I so badly want to be wrong about the DoJ here.

  2. FLAHERTY TO U.S. READERS: “Canada is not a tax haven” …

    http://canuckreport.ca

  3. The feds are so good at determining what companies should succeed. (Just look at the 100s of Millions that we lost in an investment in a single solar company.) Of course we should let them call the shots.

  4. Dam who forgot to bribe those states. oh yeah forgot Illinois former Governor is getting 30 to life. Ok I can see why Illinois is against this sale.

    Ken,
    There is nothing to settle. No deal should be allowed. ATT, give up on this and go back to selling second world service at luxury prices, and use the usual tactics of fear, uncertainty, and doubt to compete with T-Mobile and Sprint. You will still have your illegal bundling of telecom equipment and service to keep customers locked in.

    That was so well said Ken. AT$T will still be just as rich if the buy out does not go through.

    Wah wah wah maybe you cant have it all AT&T.

    Why are they so obsessed to own T-Mobile? To eliminate competition. It will make them so utterly powerful in market control.

Comments have been disabled for this post