<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Netflix is right, Amazon already a cloud champ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/08/31/netflix-amazon-openstack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/31/netflix-amazon-openstack/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A. Bailo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/31/netflix-amazon-openstack/#comment-652897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John A. Bailo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=399629#comment-652897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems like these cloud systems would be the sort of thing that might let Netflix eat itself.   Take it out further -- if all media goes to streaming, we&#039;re back to having files on a server -- or cloud.    Well, if that is what &quot;distribution&quot; is, then what does a website that sells access to media become?   Thus, Netflix is in the same boat with Amazon on &quot;books&quot;.   If people are reading text from the web, and maybe from an e-book, why can&#039;t the content owner simply put it up in the same cloud, and charge people money directly?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like these cloud systems would be the sort of thing that might let Netflix eat itself.   Take it out further &#8212; if all media goes to streaming, we&#8217;re back to having files on a server &#8212; or cloud.    Well, if that is what &#8220;distribution&#8221; is, then what does a website that sells access to media become?   Thus, Netflix is in the same boat with Amazon on &#8220;books&#8221;.   If people are reading text from the web, and maybe from an e-book, why can&#8217;t the content owner simply put it up in the same cloud, and charge people money directly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
