<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DoubleRecall turns paywalls into advertising dollars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:21:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bachner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/#comment-655506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Bachner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=396386#comment-655506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that different people will have differing opinions on this. Personally, while having completely open content is ideal, I can understand that companies have to pay bills and need to make some money. A quick &quot;paywall&quot; like this that fulfills the goals of everybody is really a good idea. Personally I think that social media traffic will continue to get more and more important to all kinds of businesses and something that utilizes Facebook in some way will be big. There&#039;s already a lot of companies listed at http://buyfacebookfansreviews.com that I think are trending in this kind of direction. I&#039;m interested to see the future of this and how many sites utilize these types of &quot;paywalls&quot;, stick with traditional ads, or create new kinds of ads and business models.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that different people will have differing opinions on this. Personally, while having completely open content is ideal, I can understand that companies have to pay bills and need to make some money. A quick &#8220;paywall&#8221; like this that fulfills the goals of everybody is really a good idea. Personally I think that social media traffic will continue to get more and more important to all kinds of businesses and something that utilizes Facebook in some way will be big. There&#8217;s already a lot of companies listed at <a href="http://buyfacebookfansreviews.com" rel="nofollow">http://buyfacebookfansreviews.com</a> that I think are trending in this kind of direction. I&#8217;m interested to see the future of this and how many sites utilize these types of &#8220;paywalls&#8221;, stick with traditional ads, or create new kinds of ads and business models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew McFadden</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/#comment-650818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew McFadden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 05:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=396386#comment-650818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[above should read &quot;working out fine&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>above should read &#8220;working out fine&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew McFadden</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/#comment-650817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew McFadden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 05:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=396386#comment-650817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to be working in out fine in our tests]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be working in out fine in our tests</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subscription Insider</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/#comment-650703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Subscription Insider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=396386#comment-650703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paywalls aren&#039;t dead ends if they are well-designed, tested and optimized.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paywalls aren&#8217;t dead ends if they are well-designed, tested and optimized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eitan Gersh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/#comment-650124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eitan Gersh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 06:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=396386#comment-650124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems like a service that will make a lot of money!
How does it effect SEO? I mean doesn&#039;t it block bots from reaching ur content?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a service that will make a lot of money!<br />
How does it effect SEO? I mean doesn&#8217;t it block bots from reaching ur content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Nash</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/#comment-650069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Nash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=396386#comment-650069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought the same, this is all positive. I&#039;m recommending this to a newspaper company with 12 sites that are possibly going under a paywall. I think this approach has money $ potential too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the same, this is all positive. I&#8217;m recommending this to a newspaper company with 12 sites that are possibly going under a paywall. I think this approach has money $ potential too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miha Zidar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/#comment-650028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miha Zidar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=396386#comment-650028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If your other alternative is a pay wall, I would guess it would leave a positive impression. The advertiser is basically paying for you to get the premium content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your other alternative is a pay wall, I would guess it would leave a positive impression. The advertiser is basically paying for you to get the premium content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Kim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/#comment-650025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=396386#comment-650025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good question. I would think that people would have a little good will toward a brand who helped unlock some premium content. But we&#039;ll have to see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. I would think that people would have a little good will toward a brand who helped unlock some premium content. But we&#8217;ll have to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Holsten</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/#comment-650018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Holsten]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=396386#comment-650018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typo:

Doesn’t this leave a negative impression of the advertiser (the brand) in the mind of the people?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo:</p>
<p>Doesn’t this leave a negative impression of the advertiser (the brand) in the mind of the people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Holsten</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/08/23/doublerecall-turns-paywalls-into-advertising-dollars/#comment-650017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Holsten]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=396386#comment-650017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t this leave a negatibe impression of the advertiser in the mind of the people?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t this leave a negatibe impression of the advertiser in the mind of the people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
