11 Comments

Summary:

In the age of blogs, companies give scoops to the media outlet with the ability to instantly amplify news. But this instant amplification of the news is changing the very idea of what a scoop is, and that change alters the very nature of news.

amplifier

In the wake of Motorola-Google deal, Felix Salmon, one of the finest bloggers in New York, penned a piece, Whither the M&A Scoop? Felix points out that “scoops are the most basic currency of business journalism” and they are what helped folks like Andrew Ross Sorkin become media “brand names” who then go on to do bigger things. He also points out that, more often than not, news is leaked to a handful of select reporters — ones that are likely to have the maximum impact by publishing the news, getting on CNBC and getting news wires rereporting it.

In the age of blogs, it is the one with the ability to create instant amplification of the original news that is the chosen outlet. No surprise that you see news break on sites like  Politico more often. And why gadget news first shows up on Engadget.

Today, news jumps from blogs to television to traditional news outlets with the same regularity as it does in the opposite direction. This is part of the industry upheaval due to democratization of distribution. This subtle but harsh reality might have helped Google decide to go straight to its own blog with the Motorola news. It seems Larry Page decided not to play favorites with any media outlet and instead posted the news on the Google blog.

I give Page full kudos for doing this — I think this is the best business practice and all companies should follow it. I remember visiting Google’s offices and meeting with the communications team and making them understand that for a company that owns Blogger and YouTube, they needed to start using those tools and be the change they wanted to see. And nothing comes bigger!

On the flip side, Google also gets a lot of incoming links, which is important for the official news of the deal to show up when someone searches on Google for “Google Buys Motorola.” Ironically, right now if I conduct that search, Larry Page’s blog post is below a post on Mashable. The fact that the original comes after what is essentially a regurgitated blog post is symptomatic of the slow degradation of Google Search — which at times feels much like driving over the always-under-construction streets of San Francisco.

What’s the scoop?

But back to the idea of scoops and Salmon’s assertion. I think there is an element of truth to it. What is also important for us to remember is that the idea of a scoop today is much different from the idea of a scoop ten years ago. Today, the news — and scoops — are more a process than one big news release. The process means someone first breaks what is essentially a tiny component of the story, and pretty quickly the whole picture becomes clear, as other reporters and media outlets join in. Now you must be wondering – isn’t that how things are always done? Yes, but earlier there were fewer outlets and the metabolism of news was slower.

Today, this happens in almost real-time, thanks to the growing presence of online publications and a sharp increase in independent voices. I would say that the process of breaking news is becoming more democratic than ever before, but it is also a lot more difficult.

I for one, welcome the change. As a young reporter trying to make a go of it, I was always competing with large giants like the Wall Street Journal who were the preferred choice of news leakers. The same went for other big publications. On the other hand, I had to earn my scoops the old-fashioned way: by building contacts, establishing relationships and knowing my beat as best as humanly possible — and then working the beat 24-7. So when I did score a scoop — and I did land quite a few for Forbes.com — it was a delicious feeling.

Pre-announcing Sun’s launch of its Corona (net-PC) was one of those stories that drove the Sun PR machine into a tizzy. Or National Semiconductor’s decision to sell off Cyrix. There were a few others along the way as well, such as Yahoo buying Flickr and Six Apart buying Live Journal. More recently I have had a few including Microsoft-Skype and Microsoft’s involvement in the Google and Motorola deal.

But as the size of the blogosphere grows, chasing the scoop becomes much more harder. There are just too many good reporters out there, and they have ability to find and post the first hint of a scoop at a lightening speed. Getting the scoop is only going to get harder, and in the end, it will kill the traditional scoop.

The amplification effect, however, has its downsides. One mistake in reporting, and it reverberates around the web and onto the traditional non-Internet media outlets. And if the news involves publicly traded companies, it can have a major impact on the stock prices or even the direction of the economy. That’s the reality of media today.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Great post!

  2. “the most basic currently of business journalism”, take it you mean currency?

    1. Sorry about that. Fixed!

  3. …”building contacts, establishing relationships and knowing my beat as best as humanly possible”…a lost art and rarely practiced by any reporters any more.

    1. I can think of at least three such individuals in my bailiwick. Of course, as I started to comment about why they’re so good – I realized the other side of the balance scale has dozens of tidy, obedient, unobtrusive drones. [/sigh]

  4. Brian S Hall (@BrianSHall) Friday, August 19, 2011

    Well said.
    New world. New rules. Still needs solid reporting.

  5. Eric Sorensen Friday, August 19, 2011

    Love McIntosh! Apple…not so much.

  6. Indus Khaitan Friday, August 19, 2011

    Great post, Om.

    The scoop gets points on the meme, but who writes the story? That makes me come back to gigaom, for stories.

    Om, don’t you think that beyond the “deliciousness” and adding to the reporter’s credo, the scoops don’t have meaning these days (keeping the linkage/SEO benefits aside)? Once the news is out, within hours there is much deeper analysis by others on the same.

  7. Om–Good commentary but for me the important point is that “scoops” as you and Salmon are defining them are merely jumping the gun on a story that a company is putting out anyway. They do not increase the sum total of human knowledge in any way. The “democratization of distribution” has resulted in a reduction in original content. Business journalism will only recover when publications figure out how to create content that people will pay for. “Jump the gun” scoops are just a macho competitive game played by the publications with no enduring value for the reader. I played too when I was at Bloomberg and won a few and lost quite a few (typically to the WSJ)–but I was much prouder of my scoops that mined new territory and were not spoon-fed by a PR person or an investment banker.

  8. Om–Good commentary but for me the important point is that “scoops” as you and Salmon are defining them are merely jumping the gun on a story that a company is putting out anyway. They do not increase the sum total of human knowledge in any way. The “democratization of distribution” has resulted in a reduction in original content. Business journalism will only recover when publications figure out how to create content that people will pay for. “Jump the gun” scoops are just a macho competitive game played by the publications with no enduring value for the reader. I played too when I was at Bloomberg and won a few and lost quite a few (typically to the WSJ)–but I was much prouder of my scoops that mined new territory and were not spoon-fed by a PR person or an investment banker.

  9. Edward Agyeman Monday, August 22, 2011

    Truly, a good read.

Comments have been disabled for this post