Comments on: 20 years of Linux [Infographic] http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/ Sat, 25 May 2013 14:46:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Génesis Gabriella G. http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/#comment-684348 Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:00:20 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=394227#comment-684348 20 years of Linux [Infographic] http://t.co/JilOpU5Q

]]> By: thomastmc http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/#comment-649205 Sun, 21 Aug 2011 19:18:16 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=394227#comment-649205 It does become kind of a stretch when you have to include the total number of internet users, and the total number of PCs sold. Those really have nothing to do with linux.

Linux market share is still less than 1 percent, with Java ME and Other tripling linux’s share together.

]]> By: Mustafa http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/#comment-648990 Sat, 20 Aug 2011 16:34:36 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=394227#comment-648990 I was born in 1991 and I’m very glad to get older with Linux.

]]> By: ghaspias http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/#comment-648885 Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:47:37 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=394227#comment-648885 Not so well done – the legends in some charts are not clear, not very informative… (who was using Ubuntu back in 1991?)

]]> By: Keshavaarao KV http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/#comment-648724 Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:24:09 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=394227#comment-648724 I have recently switched over from Windows XP to Ubuntu on my home computer.

I simply adore this OS

]]> By: Pedro Campos Toledo http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/#comment-648713 Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:43:18 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=394227#comment-648713 i thik that you made a mistake, gnome is a desktop as you said, linux is the kernel and it have all the functionality of a gnu linux distribution.

]]> By: Tibor Horváth http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/#comment-648661 Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:03:58 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=394227#comment-648661 The “then” in case of distributions refers to which year? Most of the distributions in the “then” graph weren’t around in the early 90′s. It looks more like 2002 to me.

]]> By: jah http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/#comment-648350 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:28:35 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=394227#comment-648350 Ubuntu at 6 % “then” is wrong, the first release was in 2004.

]]> By: Gobbish http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/#comment-648234 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:09:08 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=394227#comment-648234 Numbers in “Where Linux used most” are wrong: the sums are not 100% in both pie chart.

]]> By: Mitch Haile http://gigaom.com/2011/08/16/20-years-of-linux/#comment-648199 Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:16:10 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=394227#comment-648199 What year is ‘then’ is for the ‘distros used’ graphic? I ask because Red Hat wasn’t founded til 1993 and there was no ‘Red Hat Linux’ until 1994…?

]]>