<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReadItLater aims to be content shifting king</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/07/26/readitlater-aims-to-be-content-shifting-king/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/26/readitlater-aims-to-be-content-shifting-king/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:46:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/26/readitlater-aims-to-be-content-shifting-king/#comment-642638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=383949#comment-642638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can&#039;t be the &quot;content shifting king&quot; when you don&#039;t have auto-syncing working between some of your devices. It&#039;s been a known issue for a while and yet nothing has been done. Focus on the small things or you&#039;ll end up having people switching to competitors even though they originally chose your service. I did.

I agree with other do commentors that see ReadItLater as a feature. Thinking it&#039;s a product will probably only make it&#039;s function as a feature worse. Too bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t be the &#8220;content shifting king&#8221; when you don&#8217;t have auto-syncing working between some of your devices. It&#8217;s been a known issue for a while and yet nothing has been done. Focus on the small things or you&#8217;ll end up having people switching to competitors even though they originally chose your service. I did.</p>
<p>I agree with other do commentors that see ReadItLater as a feature. Thinking it&#8217;s a product will probably only make it&#8217;s function as a feature worse. Too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/26/readitlater-aims-to-be-content-shifting-king/#comment-642617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=383949#comment-642617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually Evernote is an excellent web clipper. You can save either the whole page or just the url. I liked RIL but find it much easier to save everything to one place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Evernote is an excellent web clipper. You can save either the whole page or just the url. I liked RIL but find it much easier to save everything to one place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/26/readitlater-aims-to-be-content-shifting-king/#comment-642612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=383949#comment-642612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use Evernote and Readitlater (the latter more regularly than the former, admittedly). They seem to do completely separate things really well, and I wouldn&#039;t even conceive of using Evernote to archive web pages for future perusal.

This is what interests me:

“My idea is more along the concept of using it as a platform for shifting content, no matter where you are.&quot;

I&#039;m very curious, because I&#039;m with the bidders who thought of Readitlater as more of a feature rather than a product. Really, it does everything I need it to do. Where would they go from here? Social? No thanks, I don&#039;t want other people&#039;s bookmarks, and I also don&#039;t want to have to download a native app. I read content using a browser, so concentrate on that space. I mean, God knows their website for users is Spartan, but do they really need $2.5 mill to spruce it up? Or am I just naive about the costs involved in developing a better website? To me it feels they&#039;ve already kind of solved the problem. Now they have to form better partnerships for integration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Evernote and Readitlater (the latter more regularly than the former, admittedly). They seem to do completely separate things really well, and I wouldn&#8217;t even conceive of using Evernote to archive web pages for future perusal.</p>
<p>This is what interests me:</p>
<p>“My idea is more along the concept of using it as a platform for shifting content, no matter where you are.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very curious, because I&#8217;m with the bidders who thought of Readitlater as more of a feature rather than a product. Really, it does everything I need it to do. Where would they go from here? Social? No thanks, I don&#8217;t want other people&#8217;s bookmarks, and I also don&#8217;t want to have to download a native app. I read content using a browser, so concentrate on that space. I mean, God knows their website for users is Spartan, but do they really need $2.5 mill to spruce it up? Or am I just naive about the costs involved in developing a better website? To me it feels they&#8217;ve already kind of solved the problem. Now they have to form better partnerships for integration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/26/readitlater-aims-to-be-content-shifting-king/#comment-642557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=383949#comment-642557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have used, and liked, Read It Later, but for me I find Evernote an all around more valuable tool that does almost everything RIL does, plus a whole lot more. In a field where critical mass is key to long term viability I wonder where RIL will fit in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used, and liked, Read It Later, but for me I find Evernote an all around more valuable tool that does almost everything RIL does, plus a whole lot more. In a field where critical mass is key to long term viability I wonder where RIL will fit in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
