<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge won&#8217;t speed up Apple&#8217;s suit against Samsung</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/07/13/judge-wont-speed-up-apples-suit-against-samsung/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/13/judge-wont-speed-up-apples-suit-against-samsung/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:10:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Tucker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/13/judge-wont-speed-up-apples-suit-against-samsung/#comment-640217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Tucker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=375604#comment-640217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love apple but I think android is so much better because there are more free apps on android than apple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love apple but I think android is so much better because there are more free apps on android than apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lrd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/13/judge-wont-speed-up-apples-suit-against-samsung/#comment-639147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lrd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 02:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=375604#comment-639147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t matter-- Did you guys hear that a judge has determine that Google knew they were violating Sun&#039;s Java patents and went ahead with Android anyway. Sounds like the beginning of the end. Larry Ellison is not going to stand there and let Google steal his IP.

Get ready for a multi-billion dollar settlement and possibly a new owner of Android- Oracle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t matter&#8211; Did you guys hear that a judge has determine that Google knew they were violating Sun&#8217;s Java patents and went ahead with Android anyway. Sounds like the beginning of the end. Larry Ellison is not going to stand there and let Google steal his IP.</p>
<p>Get ready for a multi-billion dollar settlement and possibly a new owner of Android- Oracle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjs_boston</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/13/judge-wont-speed-up-apples-suit-against-samsung/#comment-638989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pjs_boston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=375604#comment-638989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#039;s claim of loss is NOT based upon the idea that people bought Samsung products thinking that they bought Apple products.  It is about two things:

1) Samsung illegally adopted patented iPhone features to attract customers that would have otherwise purchased an Apple product in order to get those features.

2) Samsung illegally copied Apple&#039;s patented designs and trademarked dress to increase the appeal of their products to customers who would otherwise have been drawn to Apple products.  In effect, Samsung stole Potential Apple customers by misappropriating important aspects of Apple&#039;s brand identity and ownership experience.

Samsung is guilty as charged on both counts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s claim of loss is NOT based upon the idea that people bought Samsung products thinking that they bought Apple products.  It is about two things:</p>
<p>1) Samsung illegally adopted patented iPhone features to attract customers that would have otherwise purchased an Apple product in order to get those features.</p>
<p>2) Samsung illegally copied Apple&#8217;s patented designs and trademarked dress to increase the appeal of their products to customers who would otherwise have been drawn to Apple products.  In effect, Samsung stole Potential Apple customers by misappropriating important aspects of Apple&#8217;s brand identity and ownership experience.</p>
<p>Samsung is guilty as charged on both counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/13/judge-wont-speed-up-apples-suit-against-samsung/#comment-638986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=375604#comment-638986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, every Android phone I see looks just like my iPhone. It&#039;s so easy to confuse them. The only difference is that the Android phones are really crappy and my iPhone is awesome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, every Android phone I see looks just like my iPhone. It&#8217;s so easy to confuse them. The only difference is that the Android phones are really crappy and my iPhone is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/07/13/judge-wont-speed-up-apples-suit-against-samsung/#comment-638983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=375604#comment-638983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please, please legal system, save us from Apple&#039;s evil competitors.
Apple is awesome!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, please legal system, save us from Apple&#8217;s evil competitors.<br />
Apple is awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
