For one-quarter of smartphone users, their handset is the primary way they access the Internet, according to new data from the Pew Internet & American Life Project. It’s a sign of the growing dependence on smartphones and also shows that for a sizable chunk of users, it’s out of necessity because they don’t have a home broadband connection.
Among smartphone users, 87 percent said they used the Internet or email on their device including 68 percent who say they do it on a daily basis. Twenty-five percent said they go online primarily with their phones rather than on a computer. That’s in part because one-third of these respondents come from cell-only households that don’t have home computers. This is particularly true among smartphone owners under the age of 30, non-white smartphone users, and smartphone owners with relatively low income and education levels.
The Pew study also found that 35 percent of American adults have a smartphone, with smartphone adoption strongest among richer households as well as with younger users. Almost six in 10 (59 percent) smartphone users come from households with $75,000 or more in income, while 58 percent of American cell phone owners between the ages of 25 and 34 own a smartphone, and 48 percent of people ages 18-24 have a smartphone. Among African-Americans and Latinos, 44 percent own a smartphone. Android was particularly popular among African-Americans, with 26 percent of all cell phone owners in this group using an Android device, far ahead of whites and Latinos. Overall, Android led the way with 15 percent of all cell phones owners, followed by the iPhone and BlackBerry at 10 percent each. The Pew results are based on a national telephone survey of 2,277 adults conducted between April 26 and May 22, 2011.
The survey results are interesting for a couple of reasons. Some imagine the smartphone market as if it were solely a tech geek or early adopter phenomenon that is spilling over now to middle class mainstream users. But for many users, who sometimes don’t have the income for pricier smartphones and data plans, they’re still turning to the devices because it’s their primary link to the Internet. And the devices are extremely popular with minority groups who see a lot of value in smartphones. It’s a big opportunity I’m not sure marketers completely understand: The smartphone is bridging the digital divide for some communities, helping them leap ahead. Cheaper pricing and more affordable data plans can help encourage this trend.
The other interesting thing is that with so many people turning to the Internet from their smartphones, websites should consider upping their mobile game. Many sites are still oriented toward desktop users and assume that consumers have larger screens and technology like Flash to navigate through content. But I believe there are missed opportunities in websites that aren’t optimized for mobile, which can lose customers and possible transactions because they’re not geared for mobile users with more limited screen real estate. Google, for example, recently started offering free mobile Google Sites templates to businesses interested in building out their mobile presence. Google said it found that 61 percent of users are unlikely to return to a mobile site they had trouble accessing from their phone, and 40 percent go to a competitor’s site. Getting up-to-speed on mobile is becoming less of an option and more of an imperative for companies trying to do business on the web.
With so many people turning to smartphones and many of them primarily using them for Internet access, these are just some of the implications that need to be considered. We’re on our way toward a smartphone majority soon, but it’s unfolding in interesting ways that can provide some new opportunities for those paying attention.
I would argue that this is actually unearthing a much more fundamental change in consumer behavior. Untethering.
http://blog.jasonthibeault.com/index.php/2011/07/11/the-untethered-lifestyle/
Jason
I am going to agree with the untethering opinion, but it is not exclusive to that. I have been reliant on a mobile phone and generally another cellular data connection since the launch of the original tablet PC. Was that 2001? Sheesh…
But the reason had to do with costs as well as behavioral patterns. My son had a cell phone. I didn’t feel like maintaining two lines I never used. And, I was never home, unless my son was with me. Then, we were never home. $100 for data didn’t bother me. We also didn’t own a television.
This was about pushing the boundaries, and getting rid of silly costs. Frankly, the data issues I get between my iPhone and iPad connected to my Air make me wonder how far we have actually come. Not far enough.
Here again we have the big boys making the decisions for the consumers. Wellsfargo has decided that i’m gonna use the mobile site regardless of how I set my browser user agent ie (to desktop) and the address I type in the browser. The request is coming from a mobile network therefore i’m redirected to the mobile site so that I have to wait for several redirects and then click on the full site link to go to where I wanted to go in the first place. This wastes valuable time (especially on 1x instead of 3g,as all road warriors know) and data.
W3C needs to set the standard so the consumer is the decision maker on how content is delivered to their device not template makers. This is not about oversimplifying things for the webmaster it’s about making things simple for the user. The fewer the clicks and page views to get to the content, the more people will come to and stay on your site.
When form (galaxy tab 7″ readable screen) and function (articles that aren’t 12 pages deep to serve up one pages worth of content) you’ll have loyal consumers.
Page views have become a bs metric used to serve up ads multiple times, cheat advertisers, waste time, and waste
consumers money via excessive data charges.
Among the implications of these survey results mentioned in the article, they also highlight the growing need to secure and manage smartphones like any other endpoint. I’m a Symantec employee, so security is often top of mind for me. However, this survey brings about a key point we should all be aware of: As smartphones are used in place of traditional platforms for common computing activities — like accessing the Internet, as the survey points out — attackers will begin to target them more heavily. Cybercriminals always go where there is the greatest potential ROI, and that means going to where the people are. As more and more individuals use smartphones for potentially risky behavior, such as surfing the Web, you can bet attackers are not far behind.
For those interested, Symantec recently conducted a thorough analysis of the iOS and Android platforms, noting areas of strength and weakness in the security models of both. The whitepaper also goes into what organizations can do to protect these devices. It can be found here: http://www.symantec.com/content/en/us/about/media/pdfs/symc_mobile_device_security_june2011.pdf.
Yes smartphones have become popular to social netizens who want to stay in touch thru the internet with a lowpriced phone. Function wins over the brandname.
For resources on offshore virtual assistant services, click http://www.vaintl.net/