<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could webOS be the third major mobile platform with Samsung&#8217;s help?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/06/29/could-webos-be-the-third-major-mobile-platform-with-samsungs-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/29/could-webos-be-the-third-major-mobile-platform-with-samsungs-help/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Developmer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/29/could-webos-be-the-third-major-mobile-platform-with-samsungs-help/#comment-635037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobile Developmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=369734#comment-635037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit early to tell.  Samsung&#039;s support through their devices cannot boost WebOS alone.  Remember Bada?  HP has a lot to do in order to make WebOS a major player, and it will be interesting to see how they try to pull it off.  The platform in itself has a lot of potential and it would be sad if it went alongside Meego to developer and consumer limbo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit early to tell.  Samsung&#8217;s support through their devices cannot boost WebOS alone.  Remember Bada?  HP has a lot to do in order to make WebOS a major player, and it will be interesting to see how they try to pull it off.  The platform in itself has a lot of potential and it would be sad if it went alongside Meego to developer and consumer limbo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/29/could-webos-be-the-third-major-mobile-platform-with-samsungs-help/#comment-634942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=369734#comment-634942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to me the OS of phones (mini PC&#039;s) are only a part of the mobile web, today many OS&#039;s are good. But good OS&#039;s stuck in hardware as an end product is the past, forward is connected to massive cloud services with seemless tie ins to the PC. Who has a massive SAS to offer, who&#039;s cloud platform has learned common office tools on a massive scale to offer on a seemless cloud ecosystem. Who has the components to build a Full social, voice&amp;video communication built into a massive PC OS that people are familiar with?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me the OS of phones (mini PC&#8217;s) are only a part of the mobile web, today many OS&#8217;s are good. But good OS&#8217;s stuck in hardware as an end product is the past, forward is connected to massive cloud services with seemless tie ins to the PC. Who has a massive SAS to offer, who&#8217;s cloud platform has learned common office tools on a massive scale to offer on a seemless cloud ecosystem. Who has the components to build a Full social, voice&amp;video communication built into a massive PC OS that people are familiar with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mfrench</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/29/could-webos-be-the-third-major-mobile-platform-with-samsungs-help/#comment-634865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mfrench]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=369734#comment-634865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The third major platform is Bada.

That is, if you don&#039;t count the legacy platforms that are falling, such as Symbian and BlackBerry. Bada already outsells Microsoft&#039;s Windows Phone.

But this thing about customisation doesn&#039;t make sense. Why would Samsung be able to customise webOS more than Android? Nokia&#039;s Elop made a similar non-sensical comment about going with Windows Phone so he could customise it. Android and MeeGo are the most customisable OSes out there, due to their open-source nature. Especiall MeeGo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The third major platform is Bada.</p>
<p>That is, if you don&#8217;t count the legacy platforms that are falling, such as Symbian and BlackBerry. Bada already outsells Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Phone.</p>
<p>But this thing about customisation doesn&#8217;t make sense. Why would Samsung be able to customise webOS more than Android? Nokia&#8217;s Elop made a similar non-sensical comment about going with Windows Phone so he could customise it. Android and MeeGo are the most customisable OSes out there, due to their open-source nature. Especiall MeeGo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/29/could-webos-be-the-third-major-mobile-platform-with-samsungs-help/#comment-634835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=369734#comment-634835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung making webOS devices could help the ecosystem. If they make phones then that would open up markets that webOS currently doesn&#039;t have representation in. If they create a new form factor (touchscreen only) that might add distinction. They could also make webOS tablets. The more people HP can get onboard and the better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung making webOS devices could help the ecosystem. If they make phones then that would open up markets that webOS currently doesn&#8217;t have representation in. If they create a new form factor (touchscreen only) that might add distinction. They could also make webOS tablets. The more people HP can get onboard and the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
