5 Comments

Summary:

It’s a wonder anyone still uses traditional cellular networking voice or text services at all, given all the alternatives that pop up. But each of these services faces a critical challenge, and in my opinion, they’re all just living on borrowed time.

vumber

The list of apps that offer free texting and voice services on iOS devices grows longer every day. Viber is one, as is Vumber, which now provides cross-platform Android and iOS calling. These apps have a noble goal: provide users with an alternative to managing costly voice and text plans from carriers in addition to the data plans they must have in order to take advantage of everything smartphones have to offer. But they also come with a big downside: These apps are only as strong as their network of users, (since in most cases, free calling only happens between users who have the same app installed on their device), and as the data network that allows them to exist.

Apps like Vumber, Viber, WhatsApp Messenger and even, to some extent, Skype depend on users getting others to sign up to take advantage of the cheap or free rates. Research In Motion’s BBM works on roughly the same concept, as does the recently announced iMessage, although since both are pre-installed on specific hardware, their reach will be much greater initially than third-party offerings.

While I applaud any efforts to provide competitive alternatives to overpriced carrier talk and text plans, I think the network flaw for this kind of startup will eventually turn out to be a fatal one. For example, Google already offers a much more flexible option via its Google Voice service, and one that’s compatible with landlines and traditional cell phones out of the box. If Google Voice ever does expand worldwide, it’ll take a big dent out of potential demand for smaller VoIP offerings.

And while Google Voice is a looming threat because it doesn’t just work with itself, there’s another potential industry-breaker that already has the network part down, and just needs to expand its communications platform. I’m talking about Facebook, which, if it gained cross-platform voice support, would quite quickly rise to the top of the VoIP field.

Finally, carriers aren’t likely to take the circumvention of their services lying down. Already, we’ve seen capped bandwidth plans pretty much take over mobile broadband, and some carriers have even prohibited the use of VoIP services over their data networks.With Google and Facebook stalking the seas of free mobile communications, and carriers doing what they can to either discourage the practice or  I’m not sure I’d be too eager to swim with anyone else.

  1. I thought that at first, too. Why would anyone keep paying to text when there are free alternatives. And not long after, I increased my texting plan with AT&T. Why. Because despite not only its cost and occasional unreliability, it’s so much more convenient to use than a third-party app that I keep using it.

    Share
    1. It seems my question key up and runnoft. :/

      Share
  2. I don’t think the threat free calling and texting apps face is imminent, nor potentially fatal.
    People are starting to wise up to the fact that VoIP enables them to communicate for less than their network providers charge (it’s usually free in any case), and if the response from providers is to cap your bandwidth, they can’t do anything if the apps allow you to use wi-fi anyway, plus consumers have the option to switch to Pay As You Go, so I think the future is a win-win for the consumer.

    Share
  3. yeah I want it

    Share
  4. Yeah I want a free calling app. Because its SOOOO much cheaper than fricken phone bulls!!!!!!!!!

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post