3 Comments

Summary:

The worsening state of the printed news and advertising market has prompted The Guardian to downsize in print and become “digital-first” ear…

Andrew Miller

The worsening state of the printed news and advertising market has prompted The Guardian to downsize in print and become “digital-first” earlier than previously expected, Guardian Media Group CEO Andrew Miller tells paidContent.

“We now have a financial imperative we didn’t have before,” said Miller, who was upped from finance chief a year ago. “The financial pressure all newspapers are facing through the shift is such that our losses are increasing and I can’t see a way of those not decreasing without first making ourselves digital-first.”

Miller rejects the idea this is about digital-first now and digital-only next. “All newspapers will ultimately exit print,” Miller acknowledged. “But we’re putting no timeframe on that. This is about repositioning the business to be digital-first. I don’t know if anyone’s said that before at a major newspaper. It’s about finding the right format for newspapers in our portfolio.”

As a response both to changing reader habits and the business model underpinning print, The Guardian will cut back on newspaper pages and run less news reporting in them by next March.

Only four percent of our readers read the paper for breaking news stories in the morning – they read in print in the evening rather than earlier in the day,” Miller said. ‘We’ll do a reformatted daily newspaper in this financial year, with more analysis, longer pieces.”

Miller reckons “it’s quite a bold decision” and “it’s probably accelerated” the eventual print-to-digital transition.

Last year, Guardian News & Media made about £37.5 ($60.35) million of its £221 ($355.69) million revenue from online – a discrepancy that can’t be made up in the blink of an eye. “We have targets to double our digital revenue in five years,” Miller told paidContent. “That in itself will make sure we’re on that road.”

How will Guardian.co.uk get there? Sceptical that readers will pay for web content, its biggest current project is to grow its U.S. audience from New York to significantly grow advertiser scale – something Miller hopes will mean Guardian.co.uk can charge higher ad prices. GNM acquired paidContent’s publisher ContentNext in NYC in 2008.

But that is not the sole idea. “In a digital environment, the trick is to generate lots of business,” Miller said. “America will be a core part of that, but so will (dating service) Soulmates… our digital revenue on recruitment now is greater than from print, we want to build on that.” The corollary is a move in to U.S. classified ads, as well as the display market.

GMG is announcing the general new direction this week, but details fewer and Miller won’t be drawn on specifics like the anticipated savings from print cost cuts nor impact on print-related jobs. He and editor-in-chief Alan Rusbridger will now “start a dialogue” with staff. “I want to work with the people in the business to see through this change,” he told paidContent. “Inevitably, it will involve some fresh blood coming in at various levels.”

Of the print readers The Guardian will retain, Miller wants more of them to be subscribers. Currently, they comprise about 17 percent of The Guardian circulation, versus about 50 percent of The Telegraph’s.

The Guardian has the relative luxury of being owned by a trust and supported by two adjacent B2B publishing businesses, which GMG will, at some point, sell for a windfall. “There’s a financial envelope – as long as we hold within that envelop, it will work within the (Scott) Trust,” Miller said. “We’re working to get to a position of sustainability.”

Will any further acquisitions or disposals take place along the way? “There are no plans at the moment,” Miller said.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Matthew Green Thursday, June 16, 2011

    I am guessing the website will stay free but even then The Guardian may make money from apps etc (I believe this site has pointed out that the iPhone app has already made at least £200,000 in subscription revenue having been launched less than 6 months ago).  

  2. The Guardian contributes to its own print decline by cannibalising its copy sales by putting all that content onto the website for free.It’s madness. If i understand the strategy correctly it is that all this premium, high quality journalism is going to continue to be just given away as bait for users to come and pay for ‘premium’ services like dating. Expanding the international audience is one thing, but staking the future of a news organsation on competing with social networks, dating sites and other providers who have a core competence and the ability to innovate faster is risky. Why not focus on the core product – the quality newspaper, and make it something worth purchasing in digital form?

  3. It makes sense to become lighter on breaking news in print- we’ve all read the stuff online the day before anyway. I hope the extra content doesn’t just come from gentleman amateurs like Jenkins- let’s have specialists please- that’s worth paying for!

Comments have been disabled for this post