<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Americans love their TVs, but flirt with streaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/06/15/nielsen-cross-platform-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/15/nielsen-cross-platform-report/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:45:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Painter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/15/nielsen-cross-platform-report/#comment-632007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Painter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=361919#comment-632007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with averaging the data out to 27 minutes per day for the 18-34 demographic and then claiming they are replacing their regular TV show viewing with this, is that it doesn&#039;t clearly call out what percentage are watching full length TV shows. Most dramas, and other popular shows like Glee are closer to 1 hr long (44 minutes with fewer or no commercials). As modelmotion pointed out, wouldn&#039;t it be more likely that this 27 minutes is just YouTube and other short videos watched on their PC?

Throughout the day, I can easily rack up close to that much time myself at work just checking a few videos.

As with any of this data, it&#039;s never quite enough information to clearly call out what exactly is happening. There is no doubt some traditional TV viewing via a MSO being replaced by some online viewing via Netflix or Hulu. But I want to see more clear data before making bigger claims.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with averaging the data out to 27 minutes per day for the 18-34 demographic and then claiming they are replacing their regular TV show viewing with this, is that it doesn&#8217;t clearly call out what percentage are watching full length TV shows. Most dramas, and other popular shows like Glee are closer to 1 hr long (44 minutes with fewer or no commercials). As modelmotion pointed out, wouldn&#8217;t it be more likely that this 27 minutes is just YouTube and other short videos watched on their PC?</p>
<p>Throughout the day, I can easily rack up close to that much time myself at work just checking a few videos.</p>
<p>As with any of this data, it&#8217;s never quite enough information to clearly call out what exactly is happening. There is no doubt some traditional TV viewing via a MSO being replaced by some online viewing via Netflix or Hulu. But I want to see more clear data before making bigger claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modelmotion</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/15/nielsen-cross-platform-report/#comment-631814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[modelmotion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=361919#comment-631814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;This trend is especially pronounced in the demographic of 18- to 34-year-old viewers. Twenty percent of that demographic watch about 27 minutes of online video on their computer on average every day....&quot;

27 minutes of online video is a remarkably low number for this &quot;prime demographic&quot;. This comes at a time when the people over at Tubefilter claim the world is ready for 30 minute web series.

It would be interesting to take a much closer look within this demographic to see what the actual distribution looks like. Is the data simply skewed to the low side by an average that include a majority that watches virtually no online video, or what?

You would not have to watch a lot of Youtubers to clock up 27 min.  There is a ton of TV shows now online that have become quite popular with this demographic.  So, I am not questioning the 27min but saying we need to understand it much better.  Might make for an interesting follow up story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This trend is especially pronounced in the demographic of 18- to 34-year-old viewers. Twenty percent of that demographic watch about 27 minutes of online video on their computer on average every day&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>27 minutes of online video is a remarkably low number for this &#8220;prime demographic&#8221;. This comes at a time when the people over at Tubefilter claim the world is ready for 30 minute web series.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to take a much closer look within this demographic to see what the actual distribution looks like. Is the data simply skewed to the low side by an average that include a majority that watches virtually no online video, or what?</p>
<p>You would not have to watch a lot of Youtubers to clock up 27 min.  There is a ton of TV shows now online that have become quite popular with this demographic.  So, I am not questioning the 27min but saying we need to understand it much better.  Might make for an interesting follow up story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
