26 Comments

Summary:

Android handset makers HTC and Motorola are extending their user interface skins in new directions that are meant to help differentiate their hardware. But in some cases, the extensions could exacerbate Android’s fragmentation problem. The moves show how competitive it is for Android hardware makers.

Screen shot 2011-06-03 at 6.31.02 AM

Android handset makers HTC and Motorola are extending their user interface skins in new directions to help differentiate their hardware. But in some cases, the extension could exacerbate Android’s already sticky problem of fragmentation. UI skins show how competitive it is for Android hardware makers, and how they’re looking to any edge to help their products stand out from the crowd.

On Thursday, HTC unveiled the OpenSense SDK, a tool that will allow developers to write applications on top of its Sense UI. The new SDK is part of a larger rollout of HTCdev, a program aimed at supporting developers by providing tools and resources. Developers will now be able to write applications for Sense 3.0 and will be able to access APIs and sample code for 3-D displays and HTC’s tablet pen. But Sense 3.0 is already raising the specter of more fragmentation, because it won’t work on all older HTC Android devices.

The OpenSense SDK could be good for developers looking to build their own apps on top of HTC’s impressive Android hardware. And it shows that HTC is working even harder to enlist the help of developers to aid its cause. But it means there could be a growing library of apps that are only available on specific Android phones. Despite Android’s claims of openness, that could mean a closed set of software unavailable to other Android users. And it could also add more update woes for users. Already, many phones are slow to get new Android updates, as manufacturers have to try hard to make the new software work with their UI skins. A new set of apps on top of Sense could further complicate the update process. Google has finally owned up to the fragmentation issue, launching an industry coalition to help solve the issue. But it is still a concern that is not going away.

Motorola, meanwhile, also has new plans for its own proprietary interface, called Motoblur. CEO Sanjay Jha said on Thursday that he envisions Motoblur becoming more intelligent about how apps are affecting the performance of the phone. He said Motoblur could warn users about how much power certain apps are consuming, allowing them to shut them off to conserve battery life. He said it’s a response to the fact that bad application performance is behind 70 percent of the returns of Motorola Android devices, something he blames on the open Android Market, which lets any app in.

A Motoblur that monitors the battery impact of apps would be a useful feature for many users, and it shows again that manufacturers are trying to get creative in how they differentiate their devices. Motorola made a big bet on Android, and unlike HTC, it doesn’t have another platform like Windows Phone 7 to lean on. It needs to rise to the top in the Android scrum, which is becoming increasingly hard, thanks to competitors like Samsung, which owns the component food chain. This drive to differentiate is keenly felt by manufacturers. Nokia had considered jumping on the Android bandwagon, but it decided against doing so because it couldn’t get Google to give it special considerations that would allow it to add its own twists to the operating system. Even with Nokia’s huge manufacturing operation, it still felt it needed an inside edge from Google; otherwise it would be “just another company distributing Android,” Nokia CEO Stephen Elop said in a BusinessWeek story.

That’s the reality for current Android makers. They need to keep finding ways to make their hardware stand out, even if it means fragmenting an already fragmented platform. The platform as a whole is still soaring in sales, but the really interesting battle is continuing to unfold between device manufacturers.

  1. Me i want pure android and latest updates thst is why i stick with the google phone.

    Share
  2. Lucian Armasu Friday, June 3, 2011

    I wish they differentiated more on hardware, the stuff they’re actually supposed to be good at. So far none of the manufacturers has really proved that they can offer true differentiation with their skins. Most people still buy their phones with only 3 main factors in mind: price, design and hardware. Lately, HTC has made pretty much all their phones the same. They’re losing focus of what really matters to theirs customers while they chase away UI customizations.

    Share
    1. While I don’t disagree with you, consumers love hardware, the issue is that with Android hardware becomes a commodity, (similar to what happened in the late 90’s early 2000’s with PCs). Everyone will have dual core in 6 months. Everyone will have 12 megapixel cameras. Everyone will have 4g, GPS, etc. It becomes difficult to differentiate on hardware. Each manufacture has access to the same bits and pieces. Soon the only way manufacturers can differentiate is the type of frosting they put on top of the Android desert. The hard part for handset manufacturers is there is very little lock-in or loyalty to an Android hardware brand. So to keep users they need to lock them into the frosting.

      Share
      1. Lucian Armasu Friday, June 3, 2011

        Perhaps, but millions of people will choose Galaxy S2 over HTC Sensation because it’s such an excellent overall product with better performance.

        I think there are ways to differentiate through hardware, stuff we might not even imagine right now. It’s just that they choose to go the easy way.

        Share
    2. Many common users won’t even understand the hardware specs! So for the phone makers it is best to focus on differentiating the devices on UI and industrial design. Who bothers about what is hidden inside the case?

      Share
    3. worldbfree4me Saturday, June 4, 2011

      Apple and R.I.M. use the same Form Factors, so why not HTC. “If ain’t broke, don’t fix it” makes good business sense! The Kerocera Echo is a break from norm and look what kind of attention it’s garnering. Was the 3gs any different from iPhone 3g? Will iPhone 4gs be much different from the 4g? Don’t even get me started on R.I.M. If you don’t care for Android, just come out and say it.

      Much of the hatred towards a successful company is usually veiled envy, so say most psychologists.

      “Hatred paralyzes life; love releases it. Hatred confuses life; love harmonizes it. Hatred darkens life; love illuminates it.”
      — Martin Luther King Jr

      Share
  3. When you were writing this blog, who did you have in mind? Consumers? OEMs? Apple? Google? I fail to understand this continued cry about how hard is it for OEMs differentiate themselves with each other using Android (Tone in the last paragraph). But why are you blind to the fact that until Android came along they all were scraping the bottom of MSFT barrel without luck? Android came along and now they have a fair shot at producing something meaningful, testing themselves against the best. Now if they have to struggle hard to create a skin (OS is already made free for them), which is a glorified app in many ways, that differentiates with one another, let them do it! Its good for technology and ultimately good for consumers!

    Share
    1. This is the very point of Android. Competition between the OEMs keeps the Android ecosystem moving forward at a blistering pace. In fact a couple of blogs have commented on hardware capability outstripping the OS. I believe Android diversity is the one thing that will keep them ahead of the walled garden competitors.

      Share
      1. In your dream to escape walled garden. You just replace A’s walled garden with H’s walled garden.

        Share
  4. The makers of Android phones will have to add many features to remain competitive because Nokia Phone 7 is coming to take over cell phone market. There will be a lot at steak.

    Share
    1. Hmmm..me like STEAK…!!!

      Share
  5. Android User Experience differentiation is critical for an OEM to have their devices stand out from the me-too crowd of Android devices. But differentiating, while fragmenting from “standard” Android is working against their own best interests by disrupting the vibrant developer ecosystem and most likely confusing users.

    Our company, Onskreen, focuses on UX differentiation without creating fragmentation. We just released an Android Tablet profile for OEMs, that enables users to truly multi-task by viewing and using multiple apps simultaneously. Demo video at: http://onskreen.com/cornerstone/.

    Share
  6. All I want is to get the latest version of Android as soon as it comes out (or at the very least, fairly soon). With my Evo, I do that via CM7. My next phone has to be either a Nexus series or a heavily developed phone, like the Evo.

    Skins do nothing for me and actually work in the opposite direction for me.

    Share
    1. Exactly. Whats the point of androids rapid iteration if you get gingerbread after 8 months.

      Share
  7. And I am content to let you work out the bugs with each ‘pure google’ update in time for my official update from HTC…

    Samsung is a different story, but HTC & Moto updates are timely… :-)

    Share
    1. HTC & Moto are timely? The Droid X and the Evo are just getting Gingerbread now. It was originally released by Google almost exactly 6 months ago. That doesn’t seem very timely at all. I would consider timely to be 2-4 weeks to be sure there aren’t any major bugs, not 6 months.

      Also note that the Evo is getting 2.3.3, not the current 2.3.4.

      Share
      1. Yeah, maybe HTC and Motorola are slow. But comparing to other manufactures – they are the fastest ones to release updetes, especially HTC, they are by far the best and most reliable. And so far – Samsung is by far the worst as far as upgrades go

        Share
  8. I have 2 Motorola phones and MotoBlur is the only bloat on them.

    Share
  9. when you’re the largest mobile platform, you can customize user experience for different people

    Share
  10. If the manufacturers develop APIs and encourage devs to write to their version of android, can one really clump all of android together for marketshare numbers? I don’t think so, android is just an underlying, unnoticed embedded system at that point.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post