<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TI&#8217;s New Chip Ready for Smartphones, Tablets, Even Windows Laptops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/06/02/texas-instruments-omap4470-smartphones-tablets-windows-laptops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/02/texas-instruments-omap4470-smartphones-tablets-windows-laptops/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/02/texas-instruments-omap4470-smartphones-tablets-windows-laptops/#comment-628492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=353722#comment-628492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wasn&#039;t trying to make a point or pass judgment on the A5; I was answering the question on the difference between the chips.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t trying to make a point or pass judgment on the A5; I was answering the question on the difference between the chips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pk de cville</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/02/texas-instruments-omap4470-smartphones-tablets-windows-laptops/#comment-628471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pk de cville]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=353722#comment-628471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This chip&#039;s expected in the 1st 1/2 of 2012 and Apple will probably have the A6 out for Xmas 2012. 

Apple&#039;s going to want to pour on the power to be best in class in power, battery life, price, and all the other measures.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This chip&#8217;s expected in the 1st 1/2 of 2012 and Apple will probably have the A6 out for Xmas 2012. </p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s going to want to pour on the power to be best in class in power, battery life, price, and all the other measures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raycote</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/02/texas-instruments-omap4470-smartphones-tablets-windows-laptops/#comment-628467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raycote]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=353722#comment-628467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;A5 clock speed tops out at 1 GHz per processing core&quot;

because Apple decided that was the best tipping point between performance and battery life so your point was?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A5 clock speed tops out at 1 GHz per processing core&#8221;</p>
<p>because Apple decided that was the best tipping point between performance and battery life so your point was?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/02/texas-instruments-omap4470-smartphones-tablets-windows-laptops/#comment-628464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=353722#comment-628464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest difference is that this will run in non-Apple devices. ;) I&#039;m joking of course. 30,000 foot view: the current A5 clock speed tops out at 1 GHz per processing core, while this OMAP ramps up to 1.8 GHz per core. On the GPU side, both use a PowerVR SGX 5 series, but the OMAP uses a more current version.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest difference is that this will run in non-Apple devices. ;) I&#8217;m joking of course. 30,000 foot view: the current A5 clock speed tops out at 1 GHz per processing core, while this OMAP ramps up to 1.8 GHz per core. On the GPU side, both use a PowerVR SGX 5 series, but the OMAP uses a more current version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pk de cville</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/02/texas-instruments-omap4470-smartphones-tablets-windows-laptops/#comment-628458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pk de cville]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=353722#comment-628458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking at it from 30,000 ft, how does this chip differ from Apple&#039;s A5?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at it from 30,000 ft, how does this chip differ from Apple&#8217;s A5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian Armasu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/06/02/texas-instruments-omap4470-smartphones-tablets-windows-laptops/#comment-628368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucian Armasu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=353722#comment-628368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It won&#039;t compete with Tegra 2. It will have to compete with Tegra 3 and the dual core Krait from Qualcomm, and both seem more powerful than this. Also, I think Nvidia might keep their 6 month schedule that they first intended for Tegra 2, when they wanted to release Tegra 2 3D, but they didn&#039;t because Tegra 2 appeared so late in &quot;popular&quot; products, and Tegra 3 is coming out soon. But we might see a Tegra 3.5 in tablets early 2012 that will compete with OMAP 4470 and Krait dual core for tablets.

I think TI has already had small reception so far, and I think they&#039;ll only fall further behind. They can&#039;t really seem to keep up with either Nvidia or Qualcomm. I think Nvidia and Qualcomm will be the Intel and AMD of the ARM chip market a couple of years from now.

As a side note about Windows 8, have you noticed that it will use this year&#039;s chips? It&#039;s going to come out late 2012 for Tegra 3, OMAP 4470 and dual core Krait, while I think we&#039;ll see Tegra 4, OMAP 5 and quad core Krait for Android devices around the same time or earlier. It looks like Windows 8 ARM devices will be one generation behind Android devices, just like WP7 phones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t compete with Tegra 2. It will have to compete with Tegra 3 and the dual core Krait from Qualcomm, and both seem more powerful than this. Also, I think Nvidia might keep their 6 month schedule that they first intended for Tegra 2, when they wanted to release Tegra 2 3D, but they didn&#8217;t because Tegra 2 appeared so late in &#8220;popular&#8221; products, and Tegra 3 is coming out soon. But we might see a Tegra 3.5 in tablets early 2012 that will compete with OMAP 4470 and Krait dual core for tablets.</p>
<p>I think TI has already had small reception so far, and I think they&#8217;ll only fall further behind. They can&#8217;t really seem to keep up with either Nvidia or Qualcomm. I think Nvidia and Qualcomm will be the Intel and AMD of the ARM chip market a couple of years from now.</p>
<p>As a side note about Windows 8, have you noticed that it will use this year&#8217;s chips? It&#8217;s going to come out late 2012 for Tegra 3, OMAP 4470 and dual core Krait, while I think we&#8217;ll see Tegra 4, OMAP 5 and quad core Krait for Android devices around the same time or earlier. It looks like Windows 8 ARM devices will be one generation behind Android devices, just like WP7 phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
