<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EFF Spells Out the Problem With Lodsys/Apple Mess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/05/20/eff-spells-out-the-problem-with-lodsysapple-mess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/05/20/eff-spells-out-the-problem-with-lodsysapple-mess/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:28:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: patent litigation</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/05/20/eff-spells-out-the-problem-with-lodsysapple-mess/#comment-626059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patent litigation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 21:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=348400#comment-626059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the language used in this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.industryweek.com/articles/patent_enforcement_21538.aspx?SectionID=2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;patent enforcement&lt;/a&gt; action, it sounds like Lodsys just wants to settle and nab some licensing deals. Honestly, it probably would have been smarter for them to go after Apple and/or other deep pockets, if money&#039;s all they want, instead of pursuing one-man development shops; after all, you can&#039;t bleed a stone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the language used in this <a href="http://www.industryweek.com/articles/patent_enforcement_21538.aspx?SectionID=2" rel="nofollow">patent enforcement</a> action, it sounds like Lodsys just wants to settle and nab some licensing deals. Honestly, it probably would have been smarter for them to go after Apple and/or other deep pockets, if money&#8217;s all they want, instead of pursuing one-man development shops; after all, you can&#8217;t bleed a stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jun</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/05/20/eff-spells-out-the-problem-with-lodsysapple-mess/#comment-625599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 20:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=348400#comment-625599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple should disable all in-app purchases (to arouse widespread interest in the case and ire against Lodsys), sue Lodsys into non-existence, then bring in-app purchase functionality back online.  Anything less than that is unacceptable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple should disable all in-app purchases (to arouse widespread interest in the case and ire against Lodsys), sue Lodsys into non-existence, then bring in-app purchase functionality back online.  Anything less than that is unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
