2 Comments

Summary:

Google (NSDQ: GOOG) is going ahead without approval of the major record labels and will unveil its cloud-based music program at the search g…

Google Music

Google (NSDQ: GOOG) is going ahead without approval of the major record labels and will unveil its cloud-based music program at the search giant’s I/O event, according to several reports.

As MocoNews’ Tom Krazit noted earlier today in his I/O preview, the Google Music initiative was expected, but considered a wild card.

The Google Music program is similar to the one recently rolled out by Amazon: it allows listeners to store their music on the cloud, using it as a remote hard drive. And like, Amazon (NSDQ: AMZN), which launched its cloud-based music service at the end of March, Google has not completed agreements with the four major music labels, the WSJ notes, citing unidentified sources.

However, the Google Music plan the company will preview at its conference in San Francisco will not be for a live product; rather, this will be in a private test and not publicly available.

Ultimately, Google decided it was better to deliver a basic version than wait until it could get the full support of the labels, MediaMemo’s Peter Kafka notes. “Unfortunately, a couple of the major labels were less focused on the innovative vision that we put forward, and more interested in in an unreasonable and unsustainable set of business terms,” Jamie Rosenberg, who runs digital content and strategy for Google’s Android platform, told MediaMemo.

One difference with Amazon Music is that Google will not be opening up a retail store where it will sell Mp3s. However, users will have the ability to add new tunes to the service once they acquire them.

The service comes as Amazon is trying to secure a toehold in the music space, as it prepares for a similar cloud-based music offering from Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) and the arrival of Europe’s popular Spotify service in the U.S. Spotify has had trouble getting the necessary licenses for its service, primarily because record labels are not convinced that the company makes enough money to justify an agreement.

  1. iAmJasonPaul Tuesday, May 10, 2011

    Just like Amazon this seems like more redundancy. It will certainly make Google more money as if they needed it. I don’t thing it does anything to help the current plight of selling digital music. http://wp.me/p17GYi-s

    Also, to rain on the parade even more, aside from search, Google has a veeerry poor track record of successful execution of their inventions. Read ‘Google Must Embrace State-of-the-Design or Fail’: http://wp.me/p17GYi-u

    And finally, I must show my true bias. I believe
    @Rdio:twitter
    has thoroughly mapped out a great future for music. It seems to be catching on rather slowly, but I think when it becomes more prevalent this tired, decade long conversation about music will finally change.

    Share
  2. Sebastien_Givry Tuesday, May 10, 2011

    I would go along with you in a sense that Google has more an history (and tradition) to give content free, sometimes without appropriate rights (see recent Belgium court decision about Google & the news medias), rather than generating value for content providers. Major Labels are in that category.

    Before imposing your “vision” you must ensure you can create a trustworthy environment. Took many years to Apple to do that!

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post