Comments on: With 3-D Transistors, Intel Keeps Moore’s Law Ticking http://gigaom.com/2011/05/04/with-3-d-transistors-intel-keeps-moores-law-ticking/ Fri, 24 May 2013 16:00:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: john mitas http://gigaom.com/2011/05/04/with-3-d-transistors-intel-keeps-moores-law-ticking/#comment-621705 Thu, 05 May 2011 03:05:58 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=340313#comment-621705 Your missing the point, this will possibly make the x86 chip nearly or possibly more competitive than ARM. I want to see the benchmarks on how much power this thing saves over ARM.

MS’s push to arm may be for naught if x86′s can shrink and be as power efficient as ARM’s..

Next step, lets see some benchmarks and tests!!

So excited

]]> By: Stacey Higginbotham http://gigaom.com/2011/05/04/with-3-d-transistors-intel-keeps-moores-law-ticking/#comment-621640 Wed, 04 May 2011 21:36:45 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=340313#comment-621640 ARGGH. I will fix. Typing too quickly. Thanks.

]]> By: eideard http://gigaom.com/2011/05/04/with-3-d-transistors-intel-keeps-moores-law-ticking/#comment-621638 Wed, 04 May 2011 21:29:39 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=340313#comment-621638 Moore’s Law is a logical non sequitur – if you ever care to examine it in the light of what Intel can produce at any time.

]]> By: ShreddeR http://gigaom.com/2011/05/04/with-3-d-transistors-intel-keeps-moores-law-ticking/#comment-621635 Wed, 04 May 2011 21:17:55 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=340313#comment-621635 “cramming more chips on a transistor” , wonder how you do that ..

]]> By: Lucian Armasu http://gigaom.com/2011/05/04/with-3-d-transistors-intel-keeps-moores-law-ticking/#comment-621605 Wed, 04 May 2011 18:57:50 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=340313#comment-621605 This technology won’t come to Atom at least until 2014. They are just starting to use 32nm for Atom in 2012. By 2014, it will be too late. ARM will already dominate all tablets and maybe even gain quite a bit of market share in notebooks with Windows 8.

]]>