5 Comments

Summary:

While the focus on handset location data has been focused largely on Apple recently, new internal Google memos that emerged yesterday illustrate why the search company is also very serious about collecting Wi-Fi data through its Android handsets.

Android-Doll-540x3372

While the focus on handset location data has been focused largely on Apple recently , new internal Google memos that emerged yesterday illustrate why the search company is also very serious about collecting Wi-Fi data through its Android handsets. The memos help explain why location data is so important and why, in particular, Google has relied on data from handsets.

In a memo exchange last year, not long after Motorola chose to use Skyhook Wireless location technology in its handsets over Google’s, Google founder and current CEO, Larry Page, sent a short message to the Android team asking for a response. Android team members responded by saying that location data obtained through handsets was “extremely valuable” to Google, especially after it chose to forgo obtaining Wi-Fi location data from its Google Maps Streetview vehicles.

“I cannot stress enough how important Google’s wifi [sic] location database is to our Android and mobile product strategy,” Google Location Service Product Manager Steve Lee wrote in the memos, which were obtained by the San Jose Mercury News. “We absolutely do care about this (decision by Motorola) because we need wifi [sic] data collection in order to maintain and improve our wifi location service.”

The exchange helps frame both the battle over location and the litigation between Google and Skyhook, which is suing Google for interfering with its Motorola relationship by later pressuring the manufacturer to drop Skyhook, which it did. Had Google still had the use of its Streetview cars for gathering Wi-Fi data, it might have been less reliant on getting data through its handsets. But after it was discovered the vehicles were gathering personal information through unsecured Wi-Fi networks, Google vowed to give up using the cars for Wi-Fi data collection. The cars had been in use since 2007, helping Google gather the location of 300 million Wi-Fi hotspots, which help pinpoint a user’s location to within about 100 feet, according to the Mercury News.

Android phones are also able to help build a database of locations through mapping Wi-Fi hotspots, but it requires handsets to run Google’s opt-in location sharing service. However, if major handset makers such as Motorola chose to pay for Skyhook’s location technology over Google’s own free software, the search company ran the risk of having an imperfect picture of Wi-Fi locations. That’s the thing with location data based on Wi-Fi routers: It’s always changing, so Google and others need a reliable way to keep updating the information.

Ted Morgan, CEO of Skyhook, said the memos help explain the relation between the Google Streetview car situation, the competition with Skyhook and phone tracking. He said with the deals Skyhook was closing to signing with manufacturers, it would have locked up 7o to 80 percent of the Android device market.

“Location is one of the key chess pieces in the mobile platform battle that will rage for the next few years and clearly Apple and Google get it.  [The memos] also show why these companies have taken such an aggressive posture towards us, we invented most of the key technologies behind it all and our property is standing in the way,” Morgan said.

Now, Morgan has a big stake in this game. But he’s right in that location is a serious battleground, and whoever has the best handle on it, both gathering it and using it, is best positioned to reap a lot of money as we build a lot of services based on location. Mobile ad serving based on location is increasingly growing into a big opportunity because they put relevant ads in front of people based on where people are. Companies like WHERE, which was recently bought by eBay , are basing their whole mobile ad business around delivering location-based ads.

With location such a pivotal tool, it’s possible Google leaned on Motorola and another manufacturer to choose its location technology as Skyhook has alleged. We’ll have to wait for a jury to decide that. But as the memos suggest, good location data is important for Android handsets and Android handsets are key in improving Google’s location data. Indeed, for Google, the location data on its handsets is no doubt, “extremely valuable.”

  1. Not mentioned in this post ( and forgotten in the litigation as well? ) is Android phone’s GPS/radio chip collecting data to power the traffic layer of Google Maps.

    That data is also what powers the Google Maps Navigation “turn-by-turn” Android app…

    Which put TomTom out of business ( and basically killed of Gamin’s handheld device division too! ).

    Share
  2. Also, Walkbase uses the wireless data to make services that are hyper accurate about where you are: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ1pmbQsAIw shows you how it works. Think about Color and that kind of “are you in the same room” kinds of applications.

    Share
    1. Robert makes an important point. The ability to precisely “locate” mobile devices (and users) indoors and in urban canyons – ideally, across any mobile device (not just smart phones) – is critical. While we view it as one of the six key pillars of a robust M-commerce platform (p. 11, http://j.mp/g5gxJk), I don’t think the significance of “hyper-local” is yet fully appreciated.

      Dr. Phil Hendrix, immr and GigaOm Pro analyst

      Share
  3. Of course if this was Apple the whiners would be raising hell. But somehow Google is different. Suckers.

    Share
  4. Ryan, very timely post. In Location – the Epicenter of Mobile Innovation (GigaOm Pro report; http://bit.ly/9ugm2M), we acknowledged the importance of these assets, capabilities and services:

    “The convergence of technology, competition, investment and social media is unleashing location-based innovation and fueling an enormous wave of new location-based services. Recognizing the significant window of opportunity, Google, Twitter, Facebook and Apple are competing to be the dominant provider of location-based assets…” and “With its ability to offer location-based services ‘for free’… Google is uniquely positioned to capitalize on emerging opportunities.” (pp. 57-59, http://bit.ly/9ugm2M)

    It is worth reiterating that “the ultimate success of innovative new location-based services hinges on users’ willingness to disclose their location, which could become a sticking point” and “policies and standards for handling disclosure and location information, interoperable solutions and even ‘privacy setting aggregators’ are an urgent need.” (p. 59, http://bit.ly/c6VQDb)

    Dr. Phil Hendrix, immr and GigaOm Pro analyst

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post