<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Battery That Breathes Air! Too Good To Be True?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/04/27/a-battery-that-breathes-air-too-good-to-be-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/27/a-battery-that-breathes-air-too-good-to-be-true/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/27/a-battery-that-breathes-air-too-good-to-be-true/#comment-620703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=336710#comment-620703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, but I don&#039;t have access and the subscription cost appears too much for casual interest.  Not sure how much I&#039;d understand anyways; I have a science education but am certainly no battery expert.

Regardless, your article was refreshing for someone who&#039;s always been interested in green science.  The internet is awash with articles that trumpet the news of any and all developing technologies.  Unfortunately these same articles are so devoid of context (like required breakthroughs, economics, timeline, etc) that the reader is left with little clue about the technology&#039;s true potential.  You answered a few of my questions about Li-Air.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, but I don&#8217;t have access and the subscription cost appears too much for casual interest.  Not sure how much I&#8217;d understand anyways; I have a science education but am certainly no battery expert.</p>
<p>Regardless, your article was refreshing for someone who&#8217;s always been interested in green science.  The internet is awash with articles that trumpet the news of any and all developing technologies.  Unfortunately these same articles are so devoid of context (like required breakthroughs, economics, timeline, etc) that the reader is left with little clue about the technology&#8217;s true potential.  You answered a few of my questions about Li-Air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/27/a-battery-that-breathes-air-too-good-to-be-true/#comment-620688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venkat Srinivasan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=336710#comment-620688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You did not miss it. It is pretty technical and I did not want to get into that in this post.  If you are interested, below is a link to a journal article that does a great job of laying all this out. You can then decide if it really is 5 breakthroughs or (as one of my colleagues put it) &quot;somewhere between 4 and 10&quot;.  

link to paper: http://pubs.acs.org/stoken/campaign/youtube/abs/10.1021/jz1005384
You will need access to the journals.  

Venkat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did not miss it. It is pretty technical and I did not want to get into that in this post.  If you are interested, below is a link to a journal article that does a great job of laying all this out. You can then decide if it really is 5 breakthroughs or (as one of my colleagues put it) &#8220;somewhere between 4 and 10&#8243;.  </p>
<p>link to paper: <a href="http://pubs.acs.org/stoken/campaign/youtube/abs/10.1021/jz1005384" rel="nofollow">http://pubs.acs.org/stoken/campaign/youtube/abs/10.1021/jz1005384</a><br />
You will need access to the journals.  </p>
<p>Venkat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/27/a-battery-that-breathes-air-too-good-to-be-true/#comment-620683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venkat Srinivasan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=336710#comment-620683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:-) 

But this is missing the point. The blog post is not about going ga ga about anything or putting down anything.  I&#039;m more optimistic than pessimistic about the technology, but that is besides the point. 

It is a (in my opinion) objective look at a technology to see where we are in the process of innovation.  Are we at a point where scaling up is the issue or are we still looking at technological breakthrough? or are we still dealing with some fundamental questions?  

I will read the book though.  Sounds interesting

Venkat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:-) </p>
<p>But this is missing the point. The blog post is not about going ga ga about anything or putting down anything.  I&#8217;m more optimistic than pessimistic about the technology, but that is besides the point. </p>
<p>It is a (in my opinion) objective look at a technology to see where we are in the process of innovation.  Are we at a point where scaling up is the issue or are we still looking at technological breakthrough? or are we still dealing with some fundamental questions?  </p>
<p>I will read the book though.  Sounds interesting</p>
<p>Venkat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/27/a-battery-that-breathes-air-too-good-to-be-true/#comment-620680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venkat Srinivasan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=336710#comment-620680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breakthroughs are happening in the battery space.  In my previous post I alluded to improvements in anodes and cathodes for Li-ion batteries.  If these are commercialized, then we are talking about a doubling of energy density compared to where we are today.  That is pretty amazing.  Think about this: 15 years ago we had a battery at 1/2 the energy density of today&#039;s batteries. The cycle life of many Li-ion batteries today is &gt;1000 while it was 200-300 a decade ago.  If we can double from where we are then a lot can happen. 

Venkat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breakthroughs are happening in the battery space.  In my previous post I alluded to improvements in anodes and cathodes for Li-ion batteries.  If these are commercialized, then we are talking about a doubling of energy density compared to where we are today.  That is pretty amazing.  Think about this: 15 years ago we had a battery at 1/2 the energy density of today&#8217;s batteries. The cycle life of many Li-ion batteries today is &gt;1000 while it was 200-300 a decade ago.  If we can double from where we are then a lot can happen. </p>
<p>Venkat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/27/a-battery-that-breathes-air-too-good-to-be-true/#comment-620478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=336710#comment-620478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uh.... what are the 5 breakthroughs, or did I miss it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh&#8230;. what are the 5 breakthroughs, or did I miss it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kosh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/27/a-battery-that-breathes-air-too-good-to-be-true/#comment-619928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=336710#comment-619928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Venkat,

a book recommendation for you:

http://www.amazon.com/Pessimists-Guide-Learning-Optimism-ebook/dp/B003ZUYPP8/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1303937655&amp;sr=8-7]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Venkat,</p>
<p>a book recommendation for you:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Pessimists-Guide-Learning-Optimism-ebook/dp/B003ZUYPP8/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1303937655&#038;sr=8-7" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Pessimists-Guide-Learning-Optimism-ebook/dp/B003ZUYPP8/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1303937655&#038;sr=8-7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo &#124; Electric car app</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/27/a-battery-that-breathes-air-too-good-to-be-true/#comment-619873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillermo &#124; Electric car app]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=336710#comment-619873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really hope we will have many breakthroughs very soon. We need better batteries to improve electric cars range and recharging speed. I believe that EVs are the future of mobility and batteries are the single most important part of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope we will have many breakthroughs very soon. We need better batteries to improve electric cars range and recharging speed. I believe that EVs are the future of mobility and batteries are the single most important part of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
