<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Tibco&#8217;s Buyout Rejection a Cloud Setback for HP?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/04/13/is-tibcos-buyout-rejection-a-cloud-setback-for-hp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/13/is-tibcos-buyout-rejection-a-cloud-setback-for-hp/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Ward-Dutton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/13/is-tibcos-buyout-rejection-a-cloud-setback-for-hp/#comment-616517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Ward-Dutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=329917#comment-616517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given HP&#039;s history with middleware technologies and acquisitions, I can&#039;t help feeling that TIBCO (and its customers) perhaps escaped a nasty fate. You can argue that Leo Apotheker&#039;s presence means HP needs to be given the benefit of the doubt; but one man alone can&#039;t turn around a cultural blind-spot. HP has consistently failed to deliver enterprise software business outside network/systems management and application quality management (read: testing).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given HP&#8217;s history with middleware technologies and acquisitions, I can&#8217;t help feeling that TIBCO (and its customers) perhaps escaped a nasty fate. You can argue that Leo Apotheker&#8217;s presence means HP needs to be given the benefit of the doubt; but one man alone can&#8217;t turn around a cultural blind-spot. HP has consistently failed to deliver enterprise software business outside network/systems management and application quality management (read: testing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
