<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rise and Fall of Flip: What Went Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/04/12/rise-and-fall-of-flip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/12/rise-and-fall-of-flip/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Nash</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/12/rise-and-fall-of-flip/#comment-616350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Nash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=329318#comment-616350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to say it.  I tried to contain it. But here goes: Cisco&#039;s Flip flopped.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say it.  I tried to contain it. But here goes: Cisco&#8217;s Flip flopped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grag</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/12/rise-and-fall-of-flip/#comment-616343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=329318#comment-616343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re not asking the right questions.

Is Kaplan sad?  No, no he&#039;s not.  He made off with tons of money.  Look at the smile on his face in Kara&#039;s video.

Is Chambers contrite?  For wasting tons of his shareholders money and laying off hundreds of people (after outsourcing support jobs earlier)?  No, not really.  Read what he said:

&quot;As we move forward, our consumer efforts will focus on how we help our enterprise and service provider customers optimize and expand their offerings for consumers, and help ensure the network&#039;s ability to deliver on those offerings.&quot;

Can you parse that sentence?  Does it make any sense at all?

If Cisco is so focused now, why didn&#039;t they kill the pointless Cius tablet they&#039;re still working on for no good reason.  Why didn&#039;t they either fold or declare the Umi as a strictly business video conferencing solution given that its pricing makes it dead on arrival as a consumer product.

Ask those questions.  Ask who at Cisco helmed this thing into the ground.  Ask if any of those executives got the axe yesterday, for backing this stupid purchase.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not asking the right questions.</p>
<p>Is Kaplan sad?  No, no he&#8217;s not.  He made off with tons of money.  Look at the smile on his face in Kara&#8217;s video.</p>
<p>Is Chambers contrite?  For wasting tons of his shareholders money and laying off hundreds of people (after outsourcing support jobs earlier)?  No, not really.  Read what he said:</p>
<p>&#8220;As we move forward, our consumer efforts will focus on how we help our enterprise and service provider customers optimize and expand their offerings for consumers, and help ensure the network&#8217;s ability to deliver on those offerings.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you parse that sentence?  Does it make any sense at all?</p>
<p>If Cisco is so focused now, why didn&#8217;t they kill the pointless Cius tablet they&#8217;re still working on for no good reason.  Why didn&#8217;t they either fold or declare the Umi as a strictly business video conferencing solution given that its pricing makes it dead on arrival as a consumer product.</p>
<p>Ask those questions.  Ask who at Cisco helmed this thing into the ground.  Ask if any of those executives got the axe yesterday, for backing this stupid purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arse</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/12/rise-and-fall-of-flip/#comment-616300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=329318#comment-616300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Why didn&#039;t they flip Flip?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why didn&#8217;t they flip Flip?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTS</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/04/12/rise-and-fall-of-flip/#comment-616283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MTS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=329318#comment-616283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you buried the most important question in the 2nd to last sentence.

Why didn&#039;t they sell the product line/technology to a consumer electronics or camera company?  Or a consumer products-oriented PE firm?  Not only would it be a better financial outcome, but it would allow them to save some face.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you buried the most important question in the 2nd to last sentence.</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t they sell the product line/technology to a consumer electronics or camera company?  Or a consumer products-oriented PE firm?  Not only would it be a better financial outcome, but it would allow them to save some face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
