Comments on: CA Gov. Brown Expected to Sign Bill for 33% Clean Power http://gigaom.com/2011/04/12/ca-gov-brown-expected-to-sign-bill-for-33-clean-power/ Sat, 18 May 2013 14:20:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Nancy Whitlock http://gigaom.com/2011/04/12/ca-gov-brown-expected-to-sign-bill-for-33-clean-power/#comment-630987 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:47:07 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=329305#comment-630987 Progress being made?

]]> By: Amaya http://gigaom.com/2011/04/12/ca-gov-brown-expected-to-sign-bill-for-33-clean-power/#comment-616575 Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:42:27 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=329305#comment-616575 This new law is a giant leap forward and sends an encouraging message to the venture capital community that the state remains committed to developing a vibrant renewable energy and clean technology sector.

Between 2005 and 2009, California clean tech firms received $9 billion in venture capital funds. By the second quarter of 2010 alone, the state received $980 million in funds – the most in the world!

For more commentary visit http://blog.amat.com/clean-tech-victory-for-california

]]> By: John Dodds http://gigaom.com/2011/04/12/ca-gov-brown-expected-to-sign-bill-for-33-clean-power/#comment-616251 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:18:32 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=329305#comment-616251 Where’s the Environmental Impact and Cost benefit report?
Cost: tripling the cost of eleectricity to consumers.
Benefit NONE.
The OO2 reduction,does not reduce the amount of sunshine and energy photons that are required in the greenhouse effect to get warming.
What a waste. but I suppose someone has to employ the politicians.

]]>