<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deluxis Wants to Be the Next Hot TV Network &#8212; Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/03/24/deluxis-entertainment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/24/deluxis-entertainment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yawn</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/24/deluxis-entertainment/#comment-611932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=320337#comment-611932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[small start up? they haven&#039;t even updated their blog from Feb!!! Not looking hopeful so far...yawn]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>small start up? they haven&#8217;t even updated their blog from Feb!!! Not looking hopeful so far&#8230;yawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/24/deluxis-entertainment/#comment-611726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=320337#comment-611726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it just me, or does the business model of &quot;producing good content&quot; seem pretty suspect to anyone else. &quot;TV-quality shows exclusively for the web&quot; already exist -- in huge numbers as a matter of fact -- and even the great ones don&#039;t have TV-quality audience numbers. 

Showtime is already having problems getting people to subscribe to thier content and they have Dexter, Weeds, and Californication.  Even the NY Times is struggling to get people to warm up to the idea of a subscription. The Deluxis strategy seems, at the very least, optimistic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or does the business model of &#8220;producing good content&#8221; seem pretty suspect to anyone else. &#8220;TV-quality shows exclusively for the web&#8221; already exist &#8212; in huge numbers as a matter of fact &#8212; and even the great ones don&#8217;t have TV-quality audience numbers. </p>
<p>Showtime is already having problems getting people to subscribe to thier content and they have Dexter, Weeds, and Californication.  Even the NY Times is struggling to get people to warm up to the idea of a subscription. The Deluxis strategy seems, at the very least, optimistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
