<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Web Firms Told to Stick to EU Privacy Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/03/17/u-s-web-firms-told-to-stick-to-eu-privacy-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/17/u-s-web-firms-told-to-stick-to-eu-privacy-laws/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:13:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/17/u-s-web-firms-told-to-stick-to-eu-privacy-laws/#comment-610189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=318701#comment-610189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We run into europe privacy laws every day in our global company.  We could save money by consolidating servers here in the US, but we would have to comply with the EU safe harbor laws.   Its dumb and its expensive and it makes us maintain datacenters in Europe.   I wonder if thats really why the laws are there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We run into europe privacy laws every day in our global company.  We could save money by consolidating servers here in the US, but we would have to comply with the EU safe harbor laws.   Its dumb and its expensive and it makes us maintain datacenters in Europe.   I wonder if thats really why the laws are there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gomac</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/17/u-s-web-firms-told-to-stick-to-eu-privacy-laws/#comment-610163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 19:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=318701#comment-610163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Slartibartfas

The UK did not vote for the EU, in the 70&#039;s the UK voted for the common market, or free trade agreement. They did not vote for increasing political union.

There has been no further referendum, and the Parliament continues to agree to European measures without such referendum because they no they are not in line with the majority of the UK population.

Furthermore the key decision makers, the Council of Europe and the European Commission are far from democratic, they are not voted in or out of office - they have no accountability. The parliament, which people vote for has no real power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Slartibartfas</p>
<p>The UK did not vote for the EU, in the 70&#8242;s the UK voted for the common market, or free trade agreement. They did not vote for increasing political union.</p>
<p>There has been no further referendum, and the Parliament continues to agree to European measures without such referendum because they no they are not in line with the majority of the UK population.</p>
<p>Furthermore the key decision makers, the Council of Europe and the European Commission are far from democratic, they are not voted in or out of office &#8211; they have no accountability. The parliament, which people vote for has no real power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slartibartfas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/17/u-s-web-firms-told-to-stick-to-eu-privacy-laws/#comment-610091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slartibartfas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=318701#comment-610091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@chris

Actually the UK voted for it, twice. You also regularly take part in the European elections and the current elected European Parliament belongs to the leading forces in the EU in the surge for stricter privacy laws. Of course in case you belong to those who haven&#039;t voted in these elections you should better keep your mouth shut or otherwise risk looking like a hypocrite.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chris</p>
<p>Actually the UK voted for it, twice. You also regularly take part in the European elections and the current elected European Parliament belongs to the leading forces in the EU in the surge for stricter privacy laws. Of course in case you belong to those who haven&#8217;t voted in these elections you should better keep your mouth shut or otherwise risk looking like a hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/17/u-s-web-firms-told-to-stick-to-eu-privacy-laws/#comment-609922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=318701#comment-609922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well i have never heard of the man before this article. Here in the UK we don&#039;t want your laws. we didn&#039;t vote for you, we don&#039;t know who you are and you have no mandate. You are not accountable, electable, unelectable so take you EU &#039;project&#039; and stick it along with your stupid laws up where the sun doesn&#039;t shine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i have never heard of the man before this article. Here in the UK we don&#8217;t want your laws. we didn&#8217;t vote for you, we don&#8217;t know who you are and you have no mandate. You are not accountable, electable, unelectable so take you EU &#8216;project&#8217; and stick it along with your stupid laws up where the sun doesn&#8217;t shine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knut</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/17/u-s-web-firms-told-to-stick-to-eu-privacy-laws/#comment-609862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=318701#comment-609862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I call hypocracy!

The EU has just decided to overturn a Norwegian law which prohibits broadcasters loacted in other (EU) countries from targeting Norwegian customers with ads for products containing alcohol (such ads are illegal in Norway and may TV-stations set up offices outside Norway throgh which to broadcast just to get around Norways strict advertisement laws).

Yet the EU complains when companies target EU citizens while &quot;broadcasting&quot; from outside the EU to get around EUs strict privacy laws.

So EU, which is it? Have your cake, or eat it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call hypocracy!</p>
<p>The EU has just decided to overturn a Norwegian law which prohibits broadcasters loacted in other (EU) countries from targeting Norwegian customers with ads for products containing alcohol (such ads are illegal in Norway and may TV-stations set up offices outside Norway throgh which to broadcast just to get around Norways strict advertisement laws).</p>
<p>Yet the EU complains when companies target EU citizens while &#8220;broadcasting&#8221; from outside the EU to get around EUs strict privacy laws.</p>
<p>So EU, which is it? Have your cake, or eat it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etienne</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/17/u-s-web-firms-told-to-stick-to-eu-privacy-laws/#comment-609725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[etienne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=318701#comment-609725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just the EU trying to extort privilege as usual. At least they have not sued for damages, yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just the EU trying to extort privilege as usual. At least they have not sued for damages, yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
