<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netflix&#8217;s Risky Bet on Original Programming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/03/16/netflix-house-of-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/16/netflix-house-of-cards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/16/netflix-house-of-cards/#comment-609685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=318091#comment-609685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is another bullshit rumor started by goldman sacks who is the backer for the tv series and is trying to pull some pr so when the stock splits they are in the driver seat. This is also why GS raised the price target to $300 for NFLX. It&#039;s borderline criminal and there are alot of suckers out there going to eat this up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is another bullshit rumor started by goldman sacks who is the backer for the tv series and is trying to pull some pr so when the stock splits they are in the driver seat. This is also why GS raised the price target to $300 for NFLX. It&#8217;s borderline criminal and there are alot of suckers out there going to eat this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vipul Sharma</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/16/netflix-house-of-cards/#comment-614632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vipul Sharma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 03:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=318091#comment-614632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my views I doubt that netflix seriously wants to get into the business of original programming. I think its more about showing cable networks that if you fuck with nflx, nflx will fuck you right back!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my views I doubt that netflix seriously wants to get into the business of original programming. I think its more about showing cable networks that if you fuck with nflx, nflx will fuck you right back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lesshyperbole</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/16/netflix-house-of-cards/#comment-609387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lesshyperbole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=318091#comment-609387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Netflix charges $8 per sub, has a limited library contracted for a limited time, and may produce ONE original series. And now they&#039;re not just putting premium cable out of business... but also the cable operators and networks? GIVE ME A BREAK. Let&#039;s see them get people to actually tune into this show first. If &#039;House of Cards&#039; performed as well as &#039;Deadwood&#039;, it would be a creative success but a strategic failure. Netflix isn&#039;t doing this to &quot;send a message&quot; -- that&#039;s not a very good reason to spend $75-100M. They have to license this exclusive content to spur further subscriber growth. It also shows that they are even more willing to abandon the physical DVD business (and some of their customers).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netflix charges $8 per sub, has a limited library contracted for a limited time, and may produce ONE original series. And now they&#8217;re not just putting premium cable out of business&#8230; but also the cable operators and networks? GIVE ME A BREAK. Let&#8217;s see them get people to actually tune into this show first. If &#8216;House of Cards&#8217; performed as well as &#8216;Deadwood&#8217;, it would be a creative success but a strategic failure. Netflix isn&#8217;t doing this to &#8220;send a message&#8221; &#8212; that&#8217;s not a very good reason to spend $75-100M. They have to license this exclusive content to spur further subscriber growth. It also shows that they are even more willing to abandon the physical DVD business (and some of their customers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teemark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/16/netflix-house-of-cards/#comment-609231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teemark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=318091#comment-609231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope this experiment pans out for Netflix.  HBO/Cinemax/Showtime have developed some really great series that never would have made it on broadcast TV (Deadwood, Mad Men, Dexter, etc...).  Netflix has the added benefit that they are essentially a networked DVR.  You can watch as many or as few installments of a series whenever you want.
Netflix has proven to be pretty forward thinking with their original mail delivery model, then with streaming.  Hopefully they are predicting right again with this move, and it gives them some internal IP since Hollywood and the ISPs are all trying to take Netflix out of the picture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this experiment pans out for Netflix.  HBO/Cinemax/Showtime have developed some really great series that never would have made it on broadcast TV (Deadwood, Mad Men, Dexter, etc&#8230;).  Netflix has the added benefit that they are essentially a networked DVR.  You can watch as many or as few installments of a series whenever you want.<br />
Netflix has proven to be pretty forward thinking with their original mail delivery model, then with streaming.  Hopefully they are predicting right again with this move, and it gives them some internal IP since Hollywood and the ISPs are all trying to take Netflix out of the picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
