<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Plans a Macro Push Around Micro Servers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/03/15/intel-microserver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/15/intel-microserver/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:38:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian Armasu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/15/intel-microserver/#comment-609055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucian Armasu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=317795#comment-609055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel&#039;s biggest nightmare will be Nvidia&#039;s &quot;Project Denver&quot; based on ARM, because it will offer similar performance with some of their high-end Xeon chips, for a fraction of their energy consumption, and a fraction of their price. You can&#039;t get a more classic disruption case than ARM vs x86, and ARM will ultimately win. 

Plus, it&#039;s obvious Intel has a conflict of interest with its Atom chips, just like it did in the netbooks market. They don&#039;t want Atom chips to become powerful enough as to replace their core market, because Atom chips are much cheaper than their main ones. They are building them for servers, but they are downplaying their importance because of this conflict of interest. And because they are doing is they will not push Atoms too much to that market, and it will be an easy win for ARM servers. Then, all that ARM chip makers will have to do is move up market and compete with Intel for a much lower price and much lower energy consumption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel&#8217;s biggest nightmare will be Nvidia&#8217;s &#8220;Project Denver&#8221; based on ARM, because it will offer similar performance with some of their high-end Xeon chips, for a fraction of their energy consumption, and a fraction of their price. You can&#8217;t get a more classic disruption case than ARM vs x86, and ARM will ultimately win. </p>
<p>Plus, it&#8217;s obvious Intel has a conflict of interest with its Atom chips, just like it did in the netbooks market. They don&#8217;t want Atom chips to become powerful enough as to replace their core market, because Atom chips are much cheaper than their main ones. They are building them for servers, but they are downplaying their importance because of this conflict of interest. And because they are doing is they will not push Atoms too much to that market, and it will be an easy win for ARM servers. Then, all that ARM chip makers will have to do is move up market and compete with Intel for a much lower price and much lower energy consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
