<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Britain’s Government Too Close to Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/03/14/is-britain%E2%80%99s-government-too-close-to-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/14/is-britain%e2%80%99s-government-too-close-to-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:40:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Claughton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/14/is-britain%e2%80%99s-government-too-close-to-google/#comment-609004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Claughton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=317079#comment-609004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely, clearly my sarcasm failed to come across.  I don&#039;t for one moment believe Google and Cameron have any sort of inappropriate relationship - and if I ever did come to believe that it wouldn&#039;t be because the BPI and UK Music said so ;-)

The one interesting thing here is that the fact that Cameron is coming under criticism by the aforementioned, makes it seem more likely that this review is not in fact a cover for giving the recording industry everything they ask for - unlike the shenanigans which resulted in the DE Act.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely, clearly my sarcasm failed to come across.  I don&#8217;t for one moment believe Google and Cameron have any sort of inappropriate relationship &#8211; and if I ever did come to believe that it wouldn&#8217;t be because the BPI and UK Music said so ;-)</p>
<p>The one interesting thing here is that the fact that Cameron is coming under criticism by the aforementioned, makes it seem more likely that this review is not in fact a cover for giving the recording industry everything they ask for &#8211; unlike the shenanigans which resulted in the DE Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Betteridge</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/14/is-britain%e2%80%99s-government-too-close-to-google/#comment-608814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Betteridge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=317079#comment-608814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think trading one set of corporate overlords for another is how you make good, well-balanced policy on things like copyright. Although I think copyright reform is long overdue, the idea of Google heavily influencing policy for its own benefit is no better than the BPI doing the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think trading one set of corporate overlords for another is how you make good, well-balanced policy on things like copyright. Although I think copyright reform is long overdue, the idea of Google heavily influencing policy for its own benefit is no better than the BPI doing the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie Johnson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/14/is-britain%e2%80%99s-government-too-close-to-google/#comment-608748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobbie Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=317079#comment-608748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you&#039;d trade one form of lobbyist influence for another, because at least you feel like you have something to gain?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;d trade one form of lobbyist influence for another, because at least you feel like you have something to gain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie Johnson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/14/is-britain%e2%80%99s-government-too-close-to-google/#comment-608747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobbie Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=317079#comment-608747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cameron&#039;s chief spin doctor until recently was, of course, former News of the World editor Andy Coulson, who resigned over links to a phone hacking scandal under his watch as a tabloid boss. He&#039;s been replaced by a former BBC executive, Craig Oliver. 

But yes, Steve Hilton&#039;s job is not a public-facing spin doctor in the mould of Alistair Campbell, if that&#039;s what you&#039;re implying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameron&#8217;s chief spin doctor until recently was, of course, former News of the World editor Andy Coulson, who resigned over links to a phone hacking scandal under his watch as a tabloid boss. He&#8217;s been replaced by a former BBC executive, Craig Oliver. </p>
<p>But yes, Steve Hilton&#8217;s job is not a public-facing spin doctor in the mould of Alistair Campbell, if that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re implying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Claughton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/14/is-britain%e2%80%99s-government-too-close-to-google/#comment-608409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Claughton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=317079#comment-608409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well sure, if the likes of Mike Batt at the BPI and Fergal Sharkey say Cameron is in Google&#039;s pocket, then clearly it must be true!

Seriously, the recording industry have shown they&#039;re prepared to do just about anything to claw back their gatekeeper status so they can continue to keep running to the bank with over 80% of all earnings of all artists.  It&#039;s about time the press stopped taking their claims at face value.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well sure, if the likes of Mike Batt at the BPI and Fergal Sharkey say Cameron is in Google&#8217;s pocket, then clearly it must be true!</p>
<p>Seriously, the recording industry have shown they&#8217;re prepared to do just about anything to claw back their gatekeeper status so they can continue to keep running to the bank with over 80% of all earnings of all artists.  It&#8217;s about time the press stopped taking their claims at face value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/14/is-britain%e2%80%99s-government-too-close-to-google/#comment-608353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=317079#comment-608353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normally their spin doctors are former editors of tabloids. Steve Hilton sounds clean in comparison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally their spin doctors are former editors of tabloids. Steve Hilton sounds clean in comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ged Carroll</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/14/is-britain%e2%80%99s-government-too-close-to-google/#comment-608317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ged Carroll]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=317079#comment-608317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surely the problem was that the previous administration had been too close to old media like record labels and film companies? With the then BPI lobbyist running as a prospective labour candidate and Peter Mandelson&#039;s famous dinner with David Geffen in Corfu. 

I for one would welcome a party that was a lot closer to Google than it currently is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the problem was that the previous administration had been too close to old media like record labels and film companies? With the then BPI lobbyist running as a prospective labour candidate and Peter Mandelson&#8217;s famous dinner with David Geffen in Corfu. </p>
<p>I for one would welcome a party that was a lot closer to Google than it currently is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
