6 Comments

Summary:

As the first Apple iPad 2 reviews arrive, there’s talk of a new tablet competitor in Amazon. There are several key reasons Amazon could succeed where other tablet makers are struggling, but it’s not going to be a walk in the park for Amazon.

Kindle Wireless Reading Device

Just as the first early iPad 2 reviews are landing, there’s talk of a new Apple tablet competitor in the form of Amazon. Why? Because although there are solid hardware contenders available and coming soon from the likes of Motorola, Samsung and others, all are following flawed strategies, according to research firm Forrester. These devices are comparatively priced too high — a point we explained with the Xoom — and all are reliant on external companies for the retail experience. So how and why could Amazon succeed where others are considered to be failing?

Sara Rotman Epps, a analyst who’s been with Forrester since 2004, lays out three key answers:

  • Motivation. Apple’s recent in-app subscription rules requiring 30 percent of content revenues — including Kindle books — could feed the fire for Amazon to take on Apple. Think of it as a hedge against relying upon the iPad for some Kindle content sales.
  • Price flexibility. Epps suggests that Amazon could design, build and then sell a tablet for less than costs. A similar sales model is rumored to be in the works for Amazon’s Kindle device: the eBook reader could be given away to all Amazon Prime customers.
  • Branding and channel. Amazon is already known as a leader in the online retail business. The same can’t be said of any tablet makers, save Apple. Strong sales of the Kindle show that Amazon can create a consumer electronics device, sell it to the masses — both directly online and in retail parter stores — and then reap benefits by providing content for the device.

Epps makes a solid case for Amazon as a potential player in the tablet market. And earlier this year, Amazon announced details for its own app store that will support Android mobile applications, so there’s little doubt that Amazon is looking to get in on the tablet action. But solid reasons to enter the market and an app store won’t guarantee success.

If Amazon does built a tablet device, it’s going to face the same operating system challenges found by all who are using Google’s Android Honeycomb platform. At the moment, Honeycomb feels a little rushed to market with stability issues, missing hardware support and a lack of tablet-optimized applications. That’s taking what could be a stellar experience on Motorola’s Xoom and turning it into one that cries “not ready for prime time.” These issues should diminish over time, but it gives Apple and even bigger head start in this market.

Then there’s the sales challenge involved. It’s one thing to rely primarily on the web to market and show off an e-book device, but tablets are far more complex. Put another way: it’s not difficult to understand what the Kindle does by hitting the Kindle website, because it primarily does one thing. Tablets are complex full-computing devices which will make it more of a challenge to re-use the Kindle marketing strategy. Simply put: tablets are different devices depending which apps are currently in use.

With such challenges, why should Amazon even attempt to crack the tablet market? The answer can be gleaned from the e-book market, where according to IDC, Amazon ended 2010 with a 48 percent market share. It’s the classic razor and razor-blade model that has propelled Gillette to success: get the product in consumers hands at a low cost and then reap rewards on refills. In the case of Kindle, those refills are e-books, while for tablets, the ongoing purchases are in the form of apps.

IDC estimates that e-book device shipments more than doubled from the third to fourth quarter of 2010 with 12.8 million sales in the final quarter compared to 6 million from the prior period. That’s a solid growth rate and it allows Amazon millions of content purchase opportunities where it makes a cut of e-book sales. But those numbers pale in comparison to the hot tablet market: IDC figures 50 million tablets will move in 2011, up from 18 million in 2010. And none of those tablets currently benefit Amazon’s revenue stream, save for the Kindle book purchases which can already be made from a number of other devices.

But with a tablet of its own, Amazon has the potential to earn a 30 percent cut of every single application purchase made through its store instead of ceding those revenues to the likes of Apple, Motorola, Samsung and others. And if smartly leveraged, Amazon could advance media distribution for music and video; two digital services the company provides today. That may be motivation enough for Amazon to succeed in a segment where others are still struggling.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. An Amazon tablet makes total sense — not only to compete with Apple, but also with B&N’s nook (which can be rooted to be a more than serviceable Android tablet). It would add the missing color ebook reader to Amazon’s stable of devices. I just hope they make it lighter in weight than the Nook. But a sub-$300 price point is also key.

  2. Just so we’re all on the same page. Amazon also takes 30% of magazine revenue plus a delivery fee (http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2011/02/15/the-true-cost-of-publishing-on-the-amazon-kindle/) which means that there is even more of a hit to publishers going through the Amazon site.

    It’s also interesting that there wasn’t the outcry from the masses when Amazon had the very unfair 30/70 split where they got 70% of the revenue from magazines (http://adage.com/article/mediaworks/kindle-rivals-cozying-magazine-newspaper-publishers/141151/)

    I should note that I do have a Kindle DX (and iPad) and use both.

    I’m personally hoping that B&N don’t drop the ball and screw up the Nook.

    I don’t know who I’m more cautious of but Amazon hasn’t shown that it’s to be trusted anymore than Apple. If we are to learn from the past I would trust Amazon less since they seem more ruthless.

  3. Hmmm. Sara Rotman Epps… The woman who predicted that the entire tablet market last year would be 3.5 million units. Even though Apple had sold 2 million at the time of her prediction.

    Hmmm. With that track record I’d keep my mouth shut.

  4. so basically what we’re talking about here is Amazons version of a “legit” rooted NookColor?

    sale tablets at-cost in hopes of profit coming from digital purchases?

  5. Have you ever looked at the Kindle interface?

    Like Amazon has even a ghost of a chance competing with Apple’s hardware, software and UI chops.

  6. Amazon is already launching it’s own store for Android apps, so they can make their 30% there. They are already doing this with their succesfull Kindle app so they don’t really need a competitor for the Nook (any Android or iOS tablet already is a colour tablet, that also functions as a Kindle reader).
    They could conceivably make their own tablet, but that would be at great investment cost and risk while there is no real need to do so.
    Unless they get booted from the iPad, and the Android tablets completely fail to take off they can keep doing what they do best (which is retail).

Comments have been disabled for this post