<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solvate CEO: Universal Healthcare is Good for Web Workers &amp; the Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/03/09/solvate-ceo-universal-healthcare-good-for-web-workers-the-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/09/solvate-ceo-universal-healthcare-good-for-web-workers-the-economy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:32:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Clay McGehee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/09/solvate-ceo-universal-healthcare-good-for-web-workers-the-economy/#comment-606742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Clay McGehee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=306771#comment-606742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not even close. Before even approaching the economic question, we need to ask &quot;Is it right; is it just; is it fair?&quot; The answer to each of those is a resounding &quot;NO&quot;. Frankly, it amazes me that anyone who works for themselves could possibly support a socialist program such as this (and that is exactly what it is - socialism).

I can understand why those who are used to living off the work and wealth of others through welfare programs liking socialized health care. They are so used to living by theft that they don&#039;t even recognize it as such. A web-worker should certainly know better though. It is usually the independence of it that attracts us to this type of work in the first place. Advocating socialism in any form should be the farthest thing from any independent man&#039;s mind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not even close. Before even approaching the economic question, we need to ask &#8220;Is it right; is it just; is it fair?&#8221; The answer to each of those is a resounding &#8220;NO&#8221;. Frankly, it amazes me that anyone who works for themselves could possibly support a socialist program such as this (and that is exactly what it is &#8211; socialism).</p>
<p>I can understand why those who are used to living off the work and wealth of others through welfare programs liking socialized health care. They are so used to living by theft that they don&#8217;t even recognize it as such. A web-worker should certainly know better though. It is usually the independence of it that attracts us to this type of work in the first place. Advocating socialism in any form should be the farthest thing from any independent man&#8217;s mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Chase</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/09/solvate-ceo-universal-healthcare-good-for-web-workers-the-economy/#comment-606713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Chase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=306771#comment-606713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The outcomes you mention are indeed appealing for those who want mobility/flexibility. Universal healthcare is a ways off so for those who can&#039;t wait, I suggest individuals and startups do what I call &quot;Do it Yourself Health Reform&quot; - see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-chase/do-it-yourself-health-ref_b_787214.html. Since leaving the mothership (i.e., big employer with a Cadillac health plan) 8 years ago and being a consultant and entrepreneur, I&#039;ve taken this approach. It does require one to become more literate on the nuances of the health payment system (aka The Gordian Knot designed by Rube Goldberg).

If you want to take a serious look at how our (U.S.) system compares to others, read &quot;The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better Healthcare&quot;. An objective look shows that there are some things we do well (crisis, high tech healthcare) and others terribly (we&#039;re the world&#039;s leader, by far, in medically induced bankruptcies).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The outcomes you mention are indeed appealing for those who want mobility/flexibility. Universal healthcare is a ways off so for those who can&#8217;t wait, I suggest individuals and startups do what I call &#8220;Do it Yourself Health Reform&#8221; &#8211; see <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-chase/do-it-yourself-health-ref_b_787214.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-chase/do-it-yourself-health-ref_b_787214.html</a>. Since leaving the mothership (i.e., big employer with a Cadillac health plan) 8 years ago and being a consultant and entrepreneur, I&#8217;ve taken this approach. It does require one to become more literate on the nuances of the health payment system (aka The Gordian Knot designed by Rube Goldberg).</p>
<p>If you want to take a serious look at how our (U.S.) system compares to others, read &#8220;The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better Healthcare&#8221;. An objective look shows that there are some things we do well (crisis, high tech healthcare) and others terribly (we&#8217;re the world&#8217;s leader, by far, in medically induced bankruptcies).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/09/solvate-ceo-universal-healthcare-good-for-web-workers-the-economy/#comment-606664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=306771#comment-606664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In fact, it&#039;s the only way to go, since it spreads the risk pool and thus makes insurance affordable.  It will take this country a long, long time to get there, if ever, since there&#039;s so much misinformation about it and politicians will use every opportunity to fear-monger against &quot;socialized&quot; health-care.  As the CEO of a very small company, it would allow us to contribute to our worker&#039;s universal health care rather than offering no health-care at all...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, it&#8217;s the only way to go, since it spreads the risk pool and thus makes insurance affordable.  It will take this country a long, long time to get there, if ever, since there&#8217;s so much misinformation about it and politicians will use every opportunity to fear-monger against &#8220;socialized&#8221; health-care.  As the CEO of a very small company, it would allow us to contribute to our worker&#8217;s universal health care rather than offering no health-care at all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebootd</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/09/solvate-ceo-universal-healthcare-good-for-web-workers-the-economy/#comment-606650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rebootd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=306771#comment-606650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh my! This is utter bunk; I don&#039;t know where to being.

First off, restriction on healthcare freedom in the current system are one of its serious flawvs but its a problem created by government. More government control is not the solution. It&#039;s also a factor of healthcare being tied to an employer, which also limits choice in location and employment. The solution is soo much more simple and economical than government run healthcare. Portability: eliminate state restrictions and employer based groups. This will drive down cost and allow free choice.

Government run/single payer healthcare always increases the cost of healthcare. Always. It also reduces the quality and quantity of care available. The choice a person has becomes limited to the government budget decided by people they don&#039;t know and who don&#039;t care about them. At least now we are only limited by our own resources and health plans. Wait until it&#039;s a budget item being decided on by corrupt politicians, and when the government is already broke!

Name one government program, ever, that has spent wisely and managed efficiently. There isn&#039;t one; it&#039;s the nature of bureaucracy. You see it in large corporations and it&#039;s even worse in government because there&#039;s no profit or employment motive. Now ask yourself, do you really want to go from rough to impossible and pay more for it? Yes, you pay. It&#039;s called taxes. Ask Canada/Britain/Cuba about it. While you&#039;re at it, ask why it&#039;s so hard to see a doctor for anything other than routine services.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my! This is utter bunk; I don&#8217;t know where to being.</p>
<p>First off, restriction on healthcare freedom in the current system are one of its serious flawvs but its a problem created by government. More government control is not the solution. It&#8217;s also a factor of healthcare being tied to an employer, which also limits choice in location and employment. The solution is soo much more simple and economical than government run healthcare. Portability: eliminate state restrictions and employer based groups. This will drive down cost and allow free choice.</p>
<p>Government run/single payer healthcare always increases the cost of healthcare. Always. It also reduces the quality and quantity of care available. The choice a person has becomes limited to the government budget decided by people they don&#8217;t know and who don&#8217;t care about them. At least now we are only limited by our own resources and health plans. Wait until it&#8217;s a budget item being decided on by corrupt politicians, and when the government is already broke!</p>
<p>Name one government program, ever, that has spent wisely and managed efficiently. There isn&#8217;t one; it&#8217;s the nature of bureaucracy. You see it in large corporations and it&#8217;s even worse in government because there&#8217;s no profit or employment motive. Now ask yourself, do you really want to go from rough to impossible and pay more for it? Yes, you pay. It&#8217;s called taxes. Ask Canada/Britain/Cuba about it. While you&#8217;re at it, ask why it&#8217;s so hard to see a doctor for anything other than routine services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Reid</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/09/solvate-ceo-universal-healthcare-good-for-web-workers-the-economy/#comment-606628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Reid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=306771#comment-606628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people write &quot;Universal Healthcare&quot; don&#039;t they mean &quot;affordable&quot; or fairely-priced healthcare?  I know Mike and love the web-enabled temp agency model he&#039;s running (I&#039;ve used it), but don&#039;t all workers need affordable healthcare without the tax imposed by a middleman insurer?  All companies, all sizes, whether freelance or not?  I would argue against his position and say that I would hire a lot more full-time engineers and use temps less if healthcare costs were lower.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people write &#8220;Universal Healthcare&#8221; don&#8217;t they mean &#8220;affordable&#8221; or fairely-priced healthcare?  I know Mike and love the web-enabled temp agency model he&#8217;s running (I&#8217;ve used it), but don&#8217;t all workers need affordable healthcare without the tax imposed by a middleman insurer?  All companies, all sizes, whether freelance or not?  I would argue against his position and say that I would hire a lot more full-time engineers and use temps less if healthcare costs were lower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon S.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/09/solvate-ceo-universal-healthcare-good-for-web-workers-the-economy/#comment-606612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=306771#comment-606612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Healthcare has been made dramatically complex by the government and it is iconic that more government involvement is supposed to fix it. Be careful what you wish for.  On the surface, not having to pay for your own healthcare sounds great.  It takes away one of the major fears of failure.  But isn&#039;t the fear of failure what drives so many web workers to excel!  I would advocate what would help web workers more is to have more portable healthcare coverage and take the burden off of employers to be providing it.  Healthcare coverage should be just as available as your auto or home insurance.  Detaching the coverage from a place of employment is what webworkers need, not another poor to mediocre government run industry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Healthcare has been made dramatically complex by the government and it is iconic that more government involvement is supposed to fix it. Be careful what you wish for.  On the surface, not having to pay for your own healthcare sounds great.  It takes away one of the major fears of failure.  But isn&#8217;t the fear of failure what drives so many web workers to excel!  I would advocate what would help web workers more is to have more portable healthcare coverage and take the burden off of employers to be providing it.  Healthcare coverage should be just as available as your auto or home insurance.  Detaching the coverage from a place of employment is what webworkers need, not another poor to mediocre government run industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
