<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawmaker in Brazil Aims to Make Broadband Access a Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/03/08/lawmaker-in-brazil-aims-to-make-broadband-access-a-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/08/lawmaker-in-brazil-aims-to-make-broadband-access-a-right/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad Laws</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/08/lawmaker-in-brazil-aims-to-make-broadband-access-a-right/#comment-606532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bad Laws]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=305990#comment-606532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad lawmakers always try to put bad laws in the book. They only think of politicking not common sense. What is the need for such a law that he is proposing? First of all, there were no current laws in the book preventing people from accessing the internet through broadband or any other mean. The law is already natural if it is a law about communications or freedom of expression. I am sure Brazil already has such law in their constitution. I do not see any reasons not to fund infrastructure projects, but government paying for internet access for the citizenry is not a good law anywhere in the world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad lawmakers always try to put bad laws in the book. They only think of politicking not common sense. What is the need for such a law that he is proposing? First of all, there were no current laws in the book preventing people from accessing the internet through broadband or any other mean. The law is already natural if it is a law about communications or freedom of expression. I am sure Brazil already has such law in their constitution. I do not see any reasons not to fund infrastructure projects, but government paying for internet access for the citizenry is not a good law anywhere in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaurav</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/08/lawmaker-in-brazil-aims-to-make-broadband-access-a-right/#comment-606252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gaurav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=305990#comment-606252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel it is worldwide phenomenon or may be in many developing countries only that lately citizens are getting so many rights. Specially in India when thing are getting more and more beyond the means of majority of poor, they are being conferred rights after rights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel it is worldwide phenomenon or may be in many developing countries only that lately citizens are getting so many rights. Specially in India when thing are getting more and more beyond the means of majority of poor, they are being conferred rights after rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
