<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dawn of the Super Server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:00:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting Reading #700 &#8211; Cheap Ultrafast Broadband, Facebook replacing web, Understanding Anonymous, Secret space plane and much more! &#8211; The Blogs at HowStuffWorks</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/#comment-606034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interesting Reading #700 &#8211; Cheap Ultrafast Broadband, Facebook replacing web, Understanding Anonymous, Secret space plane and much more! &#8211; The Blogs at HowStuffWorks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=286791#comment-606034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Dawn of the Super Server &#8211; &#8220;We’re in the midst of a computing implosion: a re-centralization of resources driven by virtualization, many-core CPUs, GPU computing, flash memory, and high-speed networking. Some have predicted, only half-jokingly, that we will be able to buy a mainframe in a pizza box server that fits in a small fraction of a data center rack. That possibility — and in my opinion, inevitability — means we have a lot to watch over the next few years: what I like to call the coming of the Super Server&#8230;.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Dawn of the Super Server &#8211; &#8220;We’re in the midst of a computing implosion: a re-centralization of resources driven by virtualization, many-core CPUs, GPU computing, flash memory, and high-speed networking. Some have predicted, only half-jokingly, that we will be able to buy a mainframe in a pizza box server that fits in a small fraction of a data center rack. That possibility — and in my opinion, inevitability — means we have a lot to watch over the next few years: what I like to call the coming of the Super Server&#8230;.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Villemade</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/#comment-605989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Villemade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=286791#comment-605989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Gary,
Thanks for your answer. 

Where did you see storage going from smaller servers to bigger with distributed storage ? I mean, imho, legacy storage is basically large, dense arrays which i would call super servers.

If you&#039;re talking about the application servers who mount those network storage arrays through FC or iSCSI, and which typically had a very small local storage, then fine. But we&#039;re not comparing apples and apples that way.

It is true that nodes for distributed storage usually contain more local storage than app servers, but usually way less than large storage arrays.

I might not understand what your point is, but anyway the point is that i believe that distributed storage over independent commoditized nodes probably helps limiting datacenter operations and single server energy utilization, if not limiting the number of servers in a DC.

 It&#039;s a very interesting conversation. Thanks for the article again !

-marc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gary,<br />
Thanks for your answer. </p>
<p>Where did you see storage going from smaller servers to bigger with distributed storage ? I mean, imho, legacy storage is basically large, dense arrays which i would call super servers.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re talking about the application servers who mount those network storage arrays through FC or iSCSI, and which typically had a very small local storage, then fine. But we&#8217;re not comparing apples and apples that way.</p>
<p>It is true that nodes for distributed storage usually contain more local storage than app servers, but usually way less than large storage arrays.</p>
<p>I might not understand what your point is, but anyway the point is that i believe that distributed storage over independent commoditized nodes probably helps limiting datacenter operations and single server energy utilization, if not limiting the number of servers in a DC.</p>
<p> It&#8217;s a very interesting conversation. Thanks for the article again !</p>
<p>-marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinclosson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/#comment-605976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevinclosson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=286791#comment-605976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Gary,

   Very good post. I agree with your vision. I hope to catch up with you next time I&#039;m in your neck of the woods. We have a lot to catch up on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gary,</p>
<p>   Very good post. I agree with your vision. I hope to catch up with you next time I&#8217;m in your neck of the woods. We have a lot to catch up on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dawn of the Super Server &#124; Pixelbean</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/#comment-605920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Dawn of the Super Server &#124; Pixelbean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=286791#comment-605920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source:http://gigaom.com/cloud/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/   This entry was posted in Technology and tagged center rack, centralization, dawn, flash memory, fraction, high speed, inevitability, mainframe, midst, pizza box, speed networking. Bookmark the permalink.    &#8592; Global Android Activations Mapped and Animated [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source:<a href="http://gigaom.com/cloud/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/cloud/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/</a>   This entry was posted in Technology and tagged center rack, centralization, dawn, flash memory, fraction, high speed, inevitability, mainframe, midst, pizza box, speed networking. Bookmark the permalink.    &larr; Global Android Activations Mapped and Animated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unwired</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/#comment-605757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unwired]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=286791#comment-605757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If one day ARM and other mobile CPU can run servers, is intel in threat?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one day ARM and other mobile CPU can run servers, is intel in threat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: callsociety1</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/#comment-605720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[callsociety1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=286791#comment-605720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creepy development.  When is enough, ENOUGH???  http://www.telusconnect.net/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creepy development.  When is enough, ENOUGH???  <a href="http://www.telusconnect.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.telusconnect.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Anguiano</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/#comment-605500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Anguiano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=286791#comment-605500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can see an explanation of Hadoop and HDFS here:

http://hackedexistence.com/project-hadoop.html

There is also an example and sample code using Hadoop in the Netflix Prize Contest]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see an explanation of Hadoop and HDFS here:</p>
<p><a href="http://hackedexistence.com/project-hadoop.html" rel="nofollow">http://hackedexistence.com/project-hadoop.html</a></p>
<p>There is also an example and sample code using Hadoop in the Netflix Prize Contest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Miller</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/#comment-605419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 19:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=286791#comment-605419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Gary

for &#039;Crazy Idea 1,&#039; what would the bandwidth - up and down - to your LEO-based server farm look like... and could the storage handle the vibration from lift-off, or the radiation from the sun?

&#039;Crazy idea 2&#039; - not so crazy, and the same thinking that already drives locating data centers next to geothermal (Iceland), hydro-electric (some US states), etc. You still need the bandwidth to get data in and out of those server farms, of course... and geothermal has a nasty tendency to also mean geologically unstable...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gary</p>
<p>for &#8216;Crazy Idea 1,&#8217; what would the bandwidth &#8211; up and down &#8211; to your LEO-based server farm look like&#8230; and could the storage handle the vibration from lift-off, or the radiation from the sun?</p>
<p>&#8216;Crazy idea 2&#8242; &#8211; not so crazy, and the same thinking that already drives locating data centers next to geothermal (Iceland), hydro-electric (some US states), etc. You still need the bandwidth to get data in and out of those server farms, of course&#8230; and geothermal has a nasty tendency to also mean geologically unstable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dawn of the Super Server - Trackback from DailyKix.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/#comment-605345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Dawn of the Super Server - Trackback from DailyKix.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 17:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=286791#comment-605345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;The Dawn of the Super Server - Trackback from DailyKix.com...&lt;/strong&gt;

The Dawn of the Super Server...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Dawn of the Super Server &#8211; Trackback from DailyKix.com&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Dawn of the Super Server&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ambrosino</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/03/05/the-dawn-of-the-super-server/#comment-605333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Ambrosino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 16:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=286791#comment-605333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree on the power comment (below).   In U.S. industry (50% of electric power consumption in the U.S.) over half of the power us used by large electric motors.  This has been the mix historically, and motor manufacturers have done a lousy job of improving on power consumption save for some automatic tuning features.    Data server farms are beginning to catch up to this and that&#039;s the rub.   The risk is since most of these installations are in concentrated places (gigantic campuses or warehouses) they unbalance the electric grid and create problems even for any new smart-grid strategy.    Not unreasonable to think that some &quot;crazy&quot; ideas will actually have to be brought into play:

Crazy idea 1= put server farms in low earth orbit for cooling and solar power
Crazy idea 2 = colocate a nuclear power plant with a server installation

Maybe not so crazy ?   What do you think. 

-g]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on the power comment (below).   In U.S. industry (50% of electric power consumption in the U.S.) over half of the power us used by large electric motors.  This has been the mix historically, and motor manufacturers have done a lousy job of improving on power consumption save for some automatic tuning features.    Data server farms are beginning to catch up to this and that&#8217;s the rub.   The risk is since most of these installations are in concentrated places (gigantic campuses or warehouses) they unbalance the electric grid and create problems even for any new smart-grid strategy.    Not unreasonable to think that some &#8220;crazy&#8221; ideas will actually have to be brought into play:</p>
<p>Crazy idea 1= put server farms in low earth orbit for cooling and solar power<br />
Crazy idea 2 = colocate a nuclear power plant with a server installation</p>
<p>Maybe not so crazy ?   What do you think. </p>
<p>-g</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
