<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Under Competitive Pressure, Intel Builds Low Power Server Chip for a Startup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The World of Big Data Needs Low Power Computing: Cleantech News and Analysis &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/#comment-611584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The World of Big Data Needs Low Power Computing: Cleantech News and Analysis &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=302623#comment-611584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The idea is that data center operators can save considerable money on their energy bills by installing ARM-based servers. Chip designer Marvell is following suit with ARM chips for servers, and Intel is also developing lower power server chips. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The idea is that data center operators can save considerable money on their energy bills by installing ARM-based servers. Chip designer Marvell is following suit with ARM chips for servers, and Intel is also developing lower power server chips. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Serious Is Intel About Pushing Atom for Servers?: Cloud Computing News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/#comment-610663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How Serious Is Intel About Pushing Atom for Servers?: Cloud Computing News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=302623#comment-610663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] server in production is from SeaMicro, which contains 256 specially built dual-core Atom chips. Reporting on that story, Stacey quoted Intel&#8217;s Jason Waxman, who pointed out that because SeaMicro&#8217;s server [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] server in production is from SeaMicro, which contains 256 specially built dual-core Atom chips. Reporting on that story, Stacey quoted Intel&#8217;s Jason Waxman, who pointed out that because SeaMicro&#8217;s server [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Buys SoC Startup to Boost Atom&#8217;s Mobile Appeal: Cloud Computing News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/#comment-609794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Intel Buys SoC Startup to Boost Atom&#8217;s Mobile Appeal: Cloud Computing News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=302623#comment-609794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] power server processors from both Nvidia and Calxeda, and Intel itself has gotten into the same by building a specialized Atom processor for startup server maker SeaMicro &#8212; which is packing 256 dual-core Atom processors into a single box &#8212; and Intel even [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] power server processors from both Nvidia and Calxeda, and Intel itself has gotten into the same by building a specialized Atom processor for startup server maker SeaMicro &#8212; which is packing 256 dual-core Atom processors into a single box &#8212; and Intel even [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Plans a Macro Push Around Micro Servers: Cloud Computing News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/#comment-608958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Intel Plans a Macro Push Around Micro Servers: Cloud Computing News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=302623#comment-608958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Intel isn&#8217;t going to let anyone take on its markets without a fight. It already designed a special x86 Atom chip for SeaMicro, a startup building a micro server for web [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Intel isn&#8217;t going to let anyone take on its markets without a fight. It already designed a special x86 Atom chip for SeaMicro, a startup building a micro server for web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Sneak Peek At Calxeda&#8217;s ARM-Based Servers: Cloud Computing News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/#comment-607591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Sneak Peek At Calxeda&#8217;s ARM-Based Servers: Cloud Computing News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=302623#comment-607591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Calxeda&#8217;s mum on release plans, but it looks like I won&#8217;t be the only person eager to see what they have to offer. For another startup building out dense low power servers, check out the specs on SeaMicro&#8217;s coming second generation server. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Calxeda&#8217;s mum on release plans, but it looks like I won&#8217;t be the only person eager to see what they have to offer. For another startup building out dense low power servers, check out the specs on SeaMicro&#8217;s coming second generation server. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMD Goes on the Defensive in the Cloud: Cloud Computing News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/#comment-607382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AMD Goes on the Defensive in the Cloud: Cloud Computing News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=302623#comment-607382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] helped Intel drive its earnings higher. Meanwhile, a number of startups clearly see an opportunity to redesign servers and try new chip architectures to deliver more power efficient performance for different types of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] helped Intel drive its earnings higher. Meanwhile, a number of startups clearly see an opportunity to redesign servers and try new chip architectures to deliver more power efficient performance for different types of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarun Dua</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/#comment-605477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarun Dua]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 21:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=302623#comment-605477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The acquisition cost of this hardware at &gt; 500-600 USD per atom core doesn&#039;t make sense just yet.
The cost per core of a Xeon quadcore usually doesn&#039;t exceed this amount while delivering several times the processing power.
The TCO of this setup would be higher even accounting for power savings in a little over 2 years. In a modern virtualized environment there is no &#039;locked&#039; in hardware that won&#039;t be replaced for 3 plus years anymore.
+Lucian]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The acquisition cost of this hardware at &gt; 500-600 USD per atom core doesn&#8217;t make sense just yet.<br />
The cost per core of a Xeon quadcore usually doesn&#8217;t exceed this amount while delivering several times the processing power.<br />
The TCO of this setup would be higher even accounting for power savings in a little over 2 years. In a modern virtualized environment there is no &#8216;locked&#8217; in hardware that won&#8217;t be replaced for 3 plus years anymore.<br />
+Lucian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian Armasu</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/#comment-602206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucian Armasu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=302623#comment-602206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But if the stack of smaller and weaker Atom processors is just as expensive and probably weaker overall than Intel&#039;s smaller stacks of bigger chips, then this changes nothing.

The point of ARM servers is that a stack of ARM servers will use much less power, but will also be *much cheaper* per unit of performance. So Intel still has to worry a lot about ARM getting into the server market, and especially fear Nvidia&#039;s Denver Project.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if the stack of smaller and weaker Atom processors is just as expensive and probably weaker overall than Intel&#8217;s smaller stacks of bigger chips, then this changes nothing.</p>
<p>The point of ARM servers is that a stack of ARM servers will use much less power, but will also be *much cheaper* per unit of performance. So Intel still has to worry a lot about ARM getting into the server market, and especially fear Nvidia&#8217;s Denver Project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeaMicro&#8217;s New Server Has Latest Intel Atom N570 Chip &#8211; PCWorld :3w</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/27/under-competitive-pressure-intel-builds-low-power-server-chip-for-a-startup/#comment-602055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeaMicro&#8217;s New Server Has Latest Intel Atom N570 Chip &#8211; PCWorld :3w]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=302623#comment-602055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 64-bit Atom bomb serverRegisterSeaMicro drops another Atom bomb on the server marketVentureBeatUnder Competitive Pressure, Intel Builds Low Power Server Chip For a StartupGigaOmWall Street Journal (blog)&#160;-Greentech Media (blog)&#160;-Geek WIth Laptopall 20 news [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 64-bit Atom bomb serverRegisterSeaMicro drops another Atom bomb on the server marketVentureBeatUnder Competitive Pressure, Intel Builds Low Power Server Chip For a StartupGigaOmWall Street Journal (blog)&nbsp;-Greentech Media (blog)&nbsp;-Geek WIth Laptopall 20 news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
