<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: With LightSquared, Did the FCC Bet on the Wrong Horse?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/with-lightsquared-did-the-fcc-bet-on-the-wrong-horse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/with-lightsquared-did-the-fcc-bet-on-the-wrong-horse/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/with-lightsquared-did-the-fcc-bet-on-the-wrong-horse/#comment-600557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=300311#comment-600557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GPS interference issues came out of nowhere when the FCC &#039;fast tracked&#039; the Lightsquared license modification allowing them to expand the terrestrial segment of their network.  There was no perceived problem until that happened.

Did the FCC bet on the wrong horse?  The horse race was fixed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GPS interference issues came out of nowhere when the FCC &#8216;fast tracked&#8217; the Lightsquared license modification allowing them to expand the terrestrial segment of their network.  There was no perceived problem until that happened.</p>
<p>Did the FCC bet on the wrong horse?  The horse race was fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/with-lightsquared-did-the-fcc-bet-on-the-wrong-horse/#comment-600356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 05:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=300311#comment-600356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the FCC should have said no current carriers period. the only option should be for new competitors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the FCC should have said no current carriers period. the only option should be for new competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian S Hall</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/with-lightsquared-did-the-fcc-bet-on-the-wrong-horse/#comment-600041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian S Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=300311#comment-600041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very useful article and reporting. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful article and reporting. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/with-lightsquared-did-the-fcc-bet-on-the-wrong-horse/#comment-599956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=300311#comment-599956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FCC did require that LightSquared sell no more than 25 percent of its capacity to AT&amp;T and Verizon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCC did require that LightSquared sell no more than 25 percent of its capacity to AT&amp;T and Verizon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/with-lightsquared-did-the-fcc-bet-on-the-wrong-horse/#comment-599773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=300311#comment-599773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a wholesale network that sells to one of the major carriers does not really provide any new competition. especially when you consider that the carriers discussed(sprint, t-mobile) are already the cheaper ones.

the FCC deal should have mandated that lightsquared start a retail devision or sell wholesale capacity only to companies not currently competing retail wireless. that would truly create competition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a wholesale network that sells to one of the major carriers does not really provide any new competition. especially when you consider that the carriers discussed(sprint, t-mobile) are already the cheaper ones.</p>
<p>the FCC deal should have mandated that lightsquared start a retail devision or sell wholesale capacity only to companies not currently competing retail wireless. that would truly create competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
