<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I&#8217;ll Pass On This MacBook Pro Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why an Updated iMac Is Worth the Wait: Apple News, Tips and Reviews &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/#comment-611335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why an Updated iMac Is Worth the Wait: Apple News, Tips and Reviews &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=301700#comment-611335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on record as being somewhat underwhelmed by the MacBook Pro update, because the changes didn&#8217;t address my needs in a mobile computer, which include better [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on record as being somewhat underwhelmed by the MacBook Pro update, because the changes didn&#8217;t address my needs in a mobile computer, which include better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/#comment-602502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darwin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 03:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=301700#comment-602502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should know this is not a minor speed bump.  It is a major speed bump.  I also think TB is a pretty big deal and we will see peripherals for it soon because storage and other accessory makers see it as a money maker.  So if you don&#039;t need additional speed thats one thing but it is just not accurate that this is a minor speed bump upgrade and you should know that by now.  Also the GPU in the higher end 15&quot; is the fastest Apple has ever had.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should know this is not a minor speed bump.  It is a major speed bump.  I also think TB is a pretty big deal and we will see peripherals for it soon because storage and other accessory makers see it as a money maker.  So if you don&#8217;t need additional speed thats one thing but it is just not accurate that this is a minor speed bump upgrade and you should know that by now.  Also the GPU in the higher end 15&#8243; is the fastest Apple has ever had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mato</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/#comment-602445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=301700#comment-602445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you&#039;re right on spot.  such a nice piece of hw/sw these 13&quot; mbp&#039;s are, yet they have screen resolution from last century.  common, apple, gives us something better!
:-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re right on spot.  such a nice piece of hw/sw these 13&#8243; mbp&#8217;s are, yet they have screen resolution from last century.  common, apple, gives us something better!<br />
:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hands-On With the New MacBook Pro: Apple News, Tips and Reviews &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/#comment-602366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hands-On With the New MacBook Pro: Apple News, Tips and Reviews &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=301700#comment-602366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] stepped increments. And as I mentioned, even resource-heavy tasks seem to go off without a hitch. Darrell may be willing to wait, but I wasn&#8217;t, and if you&#8217;re looking for a much better, faster portable Mac experience, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stepped increments. And as I mentioned, even resource-heavy tasks seem to go off without a hitch. Darrell may be willing to wait, but I wasn&#8217;t, and if you&#8217;re looking for a much better, faster portable Mac experience, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Katt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/#comment-602061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Katt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=301700#comment-602061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My suggestion is to NEVER UPGRADE until the new model is FOUR TIMES FASTER than the old model.

Compared to my Mid-2007 Macbook Pro 17 Core2Duo, the new MacBook Pros are only THREE TIMES FASTER.

Thus, I need to wait one further model upgrade when the speed reaches FOUR TIME FASTER.  This may occur in the Fall of 2011, when Mac OS X Lion is in full force and some kinks and bugs are worked out of the new operating system.

A new generation of computer occurs when it is FOUR TIMES FASTER than the old generation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My suggestion is to NEVER UPGRADE until the new model is FOUR TIMES FASTER than the old model.</p>
<p>Compared to my Mid-2007 Macbook Pro 17 Core2Duo, the new MacBook Pros are only THREE TIMES FASTER.</p>
<p>Thus, I need to wait one further model upgrade when the speed reaches FOUR TIME FASTER.  This may occur in the Fall of 2011, when Mac OS X Lion is in full force and some kinks and bugs are worked out of the new operating system.</p>
<p>A new generation of computer occurs when it is FOUR TIMES FASTER than the old generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/#comment-601481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 04:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=301700#comment-601481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jeffDickey you may be right, it&#039;s an interesting question. i can imagine pointing/dragging might be an easy way to review a document with someone else for example at the coffee shop. perhaps the camera in the mac can start interpreting our eye and finger movements and offers a natural way to complement the keyboard (image recognition embedded in cell phones was talked about at MWC 2 weeks ago). Gesture based control is definitely on the way. perhaps as you say, different devices might need different variants of interfacing, and perhaps matched to te type of work under way.

other topic: i have the 7200rpm 500GB drive on last year&#039;s mac. i think i read flash prices will drop dramatically in a few months, and i am hoping larger flash are on the way so i&#039;m trying to hold out for a &quot;cheap &quot;1TB flash drive. Does replacing the drive with flash make a big difference in performance (and battery) ? my mac performs reasonably well but seems to pause at times i think when accessing the drive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jeffDickey you may be right, it&#8217;s an interesting question. i can imagine pointing/dragging might be an easy way to review a document with someone else for example at the coffee shop. perhaps the camera in the mac can start interpreting our eye and finger movements and offers a natural way to complement the keyboard (image recognition embedded in cell phones was talked about at MWC 2 weeks ago). Gesture based control is definitely on the way. perhaps as you say, different devices might need different variants of interfacing, and perhaps matched to te type of work under way.</p>
<p>other topic: i have the 7200rpm 500GB drive on last year&#8217;s mac. i think i read flash prices will drop dramatically in a few months, and i am hoping larger flash are on the way so i&#8217;m trying to hold out for a &#8220;cheap &#8220;1TB flash drive. Does replacing the drive with flash make a big difference in performance (and battery) ? my mac performs reasonably well but seems to pause at times i think when accessing the drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Dickey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/#comment-601409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Dickey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=301700#comment-601409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-601194&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Michael&lt;/a&gt;: Dear $DEITY, no!!

That would be an epic fail; HP tried that last year with one of their Windows desktops and it pretty much sat on the shelves once people figured things out.

Try this: While you&#039;re sitting at the keyboard, hold one hand up to your screen.  Keep it there for the entire time you&#039;re using the computer, moving it to random points every few seconds.

Feel how tired your arm gets after a few minutes? Feel how much effort it is to move your hand back and forth between the display and the keyboard, where your hand&#039;s real work is done?

I trust Apple to know better than to go down this rabbit hole.  Touch interfaces are great for handheld devices: my iPhone is dead-finger tech, as I expect my iPad 2 to be. But as I sit here, hammering away on a keyboard as I have for the last 35 years, I&#039;m &lt;em&gt;thankful&lt;/em&gt; that I don&#039;t have to constantly manipulate the display. Heck, I put a lot of effort into minimising my &lt;em&gt;mouse&lt;/em&gt; use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-601194" rel="nofollow">@Michael</a>: Dear $DEITY, no!!</p>
<p>That would be an epic fail; HP tried that last year with one of their Windows desktops and it pretty much sat on the shelves once people figured things out.</p>
<p>Try this: While you&#8217;re sitting at the keyboard, hold one hand up to your screen.  Keep it there for the entire time you&#8217;re using the computer, moving it to random points every few seconds.</p>
<p>Feel how tired your arm gets after a few minutes? Feel how much effort it is to move your hand back and forth between the display and the keyboard, where your hand&#8217;s real work is done?</p>
<p>I trust Apple to know better than to go down this rabbit hole.  Touch interfaces are great for handheld devices: my iPhone is dead-finger tech, as I expect my iPad 2 to be. But as I sit here, hammering away on a keyboard as I have for the last 35 years, I&#8217;m <em>thankful</em> that I don&#8217;t have to constantly manipulate the display. Heck, I put a lot of effort into minimising my <em>mouse</em> use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afsnj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/#comment-601333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[afsnj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 21:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=301700#comment-601333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow! No wonder I have never came to this site.

All MPBs (which essentially means all Apple laptops meant to replace a desktop system) now have double the number of cores on one chip. Lesser clock speed does not mean slower--more cores in a Mac means much better performance--even for everyday use in OS X SL. The new Intel chips have h.264 encoding and decoding on the chip when the software takes advantage. The clock speed of the RAM is now 33% faster at 1333MHz--this is top of the consumer line--and it&#039;s in the low end MBP! At this time, beside the HD speed being the bottle neck, the RAM speed is what people notice next--even if they don&#039;t realize the source of the performance. Oh, and Thunderolt. Come on people!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! No wonder I have never came to this site.</p>
<p>All MPBs (which essentially means all Apple laptops meant to replace a desktop system) now have double the number of cores on one chip. Lesser clock speed does not mean slower&#8211;more cores in a Mac means much better performance&#8211;even for everyday use in OS X SL. The new Intel chips have h.264 encoding and decoding on the chip when the software takes advantage. The clock speed of the RAM is now 33% faster at 1333MHz&#8211;this is top of the consumer line&#8211;and it&#8217;s in the low end MBP! At this time, beside the HD speed being the bottle neck, the RAM speed is what people notice next&#8211;even if they don&#8217;t realize the source of the performance. Oh, and Thunderolt. Come on people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/#comment-601194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=301700#comment-601194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;d expect a major upgrade to the screen to become touch capable. or the camera to enable similar free-space gestures ...  the macbook pro and tablet should converge in user interface. i guess as SteveW said below, using an iPad as secondary touch monitor might be the way for now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d expect a major upgrade to the screen to become touch capable. or the camera to enable similar free-space gestures &#8230;  the macbook pro and tablet should converge in user interface. i guess as SteveW said below, using an iPad as secondary touch monitor might be the way for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pecos Bill</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/24/why-ill-pass-on-this-macbook-pro-update-2/#comment-600956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pecos Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=301700#comment-600956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will ALWAYS be better things coming later. If you&#039;re happy with what you have, no reason to change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will ALWAYS be better things coming later. If you&#8217;re happy with what you have, no reason to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
