<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court Rules Ivi.tv Not a Cable System, Issues Injunction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/02/22/ivitv-injunction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/22/ivitv-injunction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:16:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call The Lawyers: Bamboom Wants to Be Netflix for Broadcasters: Online Video News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/22/ivitv-injunction/#comment-616801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Call The Lawyers: Bamboom Wants to Be Netflix for Broadcasters: Online Video News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=300738#comment-616801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Bamboom CEO Chaitanya KanojiaCord cutters or those who want to watch American Idol or local sports teams in real-time on their connected devices will soon have a new option thanks to Bamboom, a startup that said it raised $4.5 million today in seed capital. The company wants to become a Netflix equivalent for the broadcast world &#8212; but the broadcast world may not enjoy having the company infringe on its turf. Similar companies, such as Ivi.tv, have tried this and failed. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bamboom CEO Chaitanya KanojiaCord cutters or those who want to watch American Idol or local sports teams in real-time on their connected devices will soon have a new option thanks to Bamboom, a startup that said it raised $4.5 million today in seed capital. The company wants to become a Netflix equivalent for the broadcast world &#8212; but the broadcast world may not enjoy having the company infringe on its turf. Similar companies, such as Ivi.tv, have tried this and failed. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivi TV Deemed Illegal As Judge In Lawsuit States Online Video Service Not Cable System</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/22/ivitv-injunction/#comment-601558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ivi TV Deemed Illegal As Judge In Lawsuit States Online Video Service Not Cable System]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=300738#comment-601558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] week saw Judge Naomi Buchwald of the Southern District of New York rule in favor of the broadcasters. She stated that ivi TV was not protected by the 1970s law, mainly because the service cannot be [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week saw Judge Naomi Buchwald of the Southern District of New York rule in favor of the broadcasters. She stated that ivi TV was not protected by the 1970s law, mainly because the service cannot be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Alvear</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/22/ivitv-injunction/#comment-600946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose Alvear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=300738#comment-600946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure why anyone is following this story. Companies have been trying to get away with doing this exact same thing for over 10 years. They all have different excuses that lets them do this, of course. 

Calling yourself a &quot;cable&quot; system is pretty disingenuous since they don&#039;t fit any conceivable definition of a cable provider. Or an IPTV provider. 

Sounds like ivi is run by lawyers, rather than engineers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why anyone is following this story. Companies have been trying to get away with doing this exact same thing for over 10 years. They all have different excuses that lets them do this, of course. </p>
<p>Calling yourself a &#8220;cable&#8221; system is pretty disingenuous since they don&#8217;t fit any conceivable definition of a cable provider. Or an IPTV provider. </p>
<p>Sounds like ivi is run by lawyers, rather than engineers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rurikbradbury</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/22/ivitv-injunction/#comment-598773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rurikbradbury]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=300738#comment-598773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks goodness that Big TV is protecting us from dangerous companies like ivi, with their so-called &#039;convenience&#039; and &#039;good user experience&#039;.

Those Big TV execs sure have our backs!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks goodness that Big TV is protecting us from dangerous companies like ivi, with their so-called &#8216;convenience&#8217; and &#8216;good user experience&#8217;.</p>
<p>Those Big TV execs sure have our backs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
