<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Startup Charts the Future of Camera Phones, Ends Megapixel Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:52:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/#comment-598318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=295577#comment-598318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice to see the megapixels issue addressed since there are so many misconceptions floating around.  In the dedicated camera space we&#039;re starting to see a logical and needed pull back from cramming more megapixels on a sensor which actually led to a decline in image quality in models without the specs to handle it.  

Looking forward to learning more about the product but a camera phone will never replace my DSLR (despite what Techcrunch says).  My first digital camera was two megapixels and the biggest flaw it had was being a battery hog.  The image quality was surprisingly good (in good light) and quite suitable for anything not needing to be enlarged for framing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see the megapixels issue addressed since there are so many misconceptions floating around.  In the dedicated camera space we&#8217;re starting to see a logical and needed pull back from cramming more megapixels on a sensor which actually led to a decline in image quality in models without the specs to handle it.  </p>
<p>Looking forward to learning more about the product but a camera phone will never replace my DSLR (despite what Techcrunch says).  My first digital camera was two megapixels and the biggest flaw it had was being a battery hog.  The image quality was surprisingly good (in good light) and quite suitable for anything not needing to be enlarged for framing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWC: The Gigahertz Race Goes Mobile And Here&#8217;s Why: Tech News and Analysis &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/#comment-592650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MWC: The Gigahertz Race Goes Mobile And Here&#8217;s Why: Tech News and Analysis &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=295577#comment-592650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] helps with making a single lens work better. For example software, such as the that offered by Pelican Imaging, helps improve picture quality outside of adding megapixels, but the software and the module (see picture) consumes compute [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] helps with making a single lens work better. For example software, such as the that offered by Pelican Imaging, helps improve picture quality outside of adding megapixels, but the software and the module (see picture) consumes compute [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Las Nuevas Cámaras podrían tener no uno ni dos lentes, sino 25 &#171; Status: Geek</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/#comment-591059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Las Nuevas Cámaras podrían tener no uno ni dos lentes, sino 25 &#171; Status: Geek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=295577#comment-591059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Fuente: Gigaom [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fuente: Gigaom [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelican Imaging wants to cram 25 cameras into your cellphone &#171; USC Mobile and Environmental Media Lab</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/#comment-590680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pelican Imaging wants to cram 25 cameras into your cellphone &#171; USC Mobile and Environmental Media Lab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=295577#comment-590680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pelican Imaging, via GigaOm [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pelican Imaging, via GigaOm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelican Imaging aims to improve smartphone cameras, dispel MegaPixel Myth &#124; GottaBeMobile</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/#comment-590028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pelican Imaging aims to improve smartphone cameras, dispel MegaPixel Myth &#124; GottaBeMobile]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=295577#comment-590028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] TweetShareEmailGigaOM has an excellent write-up about a start-up company called Pelican Imaging that is taking a novel approach to smartphone cameras that should lead to better photos without requiring giant lenses or larger sensors. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TweetShareEmailGigaOM has an excellent write-up about a start-up company called Pelican Imaging that is taking a novel approach to smartphone cameras that should lead to better photos without requiring giant lenses or larger sensors. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vancouver-web-development</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/#comment-589849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vancouver-web-development]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=295577#comment-589849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spock would say, It is only logical to do this. I guess everything crumbles down to the cost and benefit game, with little bit of marketing hype.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spock would say, It is only logical to do this. I guess everything crumbles down to the cost and benefit game, with little bit of marketing hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelican quiere revolucionar las cámaras de los móviles - Gizmodo ES - The gadgets weblog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/#comment-589647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pelican quiere revolucionar las cámaras de los móviles - Gizmodo ES - The gadgets weblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=295577#comment-589647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] pronto en nuestros móviles y ya puestos, en webcams y todo tipo de dispositivos.— Dani Burón [GigaOM]     [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pronto en nuestros móviles y ya puestos, en webcams y todo tipo de dispositivos.— Dani Burón [GigaOM]     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rethinking the smartphone camera</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/#comment-589610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rethinking the smartphone camera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=295577#comment-589610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] which directly translates to inferior image quality at any given level of light.  Gigaom mentioned a new startup in Mountain View California called Pelican Imaging aims to change all this with their [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which directly translates to inferior image quality at any given level of light.  Gigaom mentioned a new startup in Mountain View California called Pelican Imaging aims to change all this with their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepjabbi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/#comment-589586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deepjabbi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=295577#comment-589586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very informative write up, I wish al the technical &amp; management team all the success. A great innovation,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative write up, I wish al the technical &amp; management team all the success. A great innovation,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Peterson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/09/pelican-imaging/#comment-589548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Peterson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=295577#comment-589548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couldn&#039;t it just be that they feel they have to bust the megapixel myth because their new camera can&#039;t produce images with a high resolution?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t it just be that they feel they have to bust the megapixel myth because their new camera can&#8217;t produce images with a high resolution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
