<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court Delivers Verizon Net Neutrality Suit a Setback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/02/02/court-delivers-verizon-net-neutrality-suit-a-setback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/02/court-delivers-verizon-net-neutrality-suit-a-setback/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:54:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/02/court-delivers-verizon-net-neutrality-suit-a-setback/#comment-587900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=293333#comment-587900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bloggers at GigaOM would prefer the government to have a much larger role to play in the internet for fear of large corporations blocking access to certain websites. Yet the only entity that is blocking access to website is their beloved government. Just this last week they stole domain names from websites without any due process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bloggers at GigaOM would prefer the government to have a much larger role to play in the internet for fear of large corporations blocking access to certain websites. Yet the only entity that is blocking access to website is their beloved government. Just this last week they stole domain names from websites without any due process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/02/court-delivers-verizon-net-neutrality-suit-a-setback/#comment-585312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=293333#comment-585312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True. But it does say those judges won&#039;t hear it. That&#039;s all I was trying to say here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. But it does say those judges won&#8217;t hear it. That&#8217;s all I was trying to say here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Light Reading Cable - The Bauminator - Nice Try, Verizon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/02/court-delivers-verizon-net-neutrality-suit-a-setback/#comment-585308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Light Reading Cable - The Bauminator - Nice Try, Verizon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=293333#comment-585308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Order and FCC Votes to Approve Net Neutrality Rules.)  The U.S. Court of Appeals on Wednesday struck down the telco&#039;s motion to have the same three-judge panel hear the case that ended up reversing the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Order and FCC Votes to Approve Net Neutrality Rules.)  The U.S. Court of Appeals on Wednesday struck down the telco&#039;s motion to have the same three-judge panel hear the case that ended up reversing the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/02/02/court-delivers-verizon-net-neutrality-suit-a-setback/#comment-585260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=293333#comment-585260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039; actually no guarantee that the case won&#039;t go to the DC Circuit anyway, all this ruling does is delay the decision for a while.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217; actually no guarantee that the case won&#8217;t go to the DC Circuit anyway, all this ruling does is delay the decision for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
