<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Net Neutrality Timeline: How We Got Here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/12/21/a-net-neutrality-timeline-how-we-got-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/21/a-net-neutrality-timeline-how-we-got-here/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollyann</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/21/a-net-neutrality-timeline-how-we-got-here/#comment-749867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hollyann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=278931#comment-749867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Up til 2010 A Net Neutrality Timeline: How We Got Here http://t.co/RmAfJcbT]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up til 2010 A Net Neutrality Timeline: How We Got Here <a href="http://t.co/RmAfJcbT" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/RmAfJcbT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using Your iPad on Sprint&#8217;s Network With a Virgin MiFi: Apple News, Tips and Reviews &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/21/a-net-neutrality-timeline-how-we-got-here/#comment-605885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Using Your iPad on Sprint&#8217;s Network With a Virgin MiFi: Apple News, Tips and Reviews &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=278931#comment-605885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] for $40.00 for 30 days. It seemed too good to be true, and eventually, it was. Whether due to the recent changes regarding net neutrality, or simply because Virgin is following industry trends, the company will now &#8220;throttle&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for $40.00 for 30 days. It seemed too good to be true, and eventually, it was. Whether due to the recent changes regarding net neutrality, or simply because Virgin is following industry trends, the company will now &#8220;throttle&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Net Neutrality Rules May Signal A Change in Wireless Pricing: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/21/a-net-neutrality-timeline-how-we-got-here/#comment-557629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Net Neutrality Rules May Signal A Change in Wireless Pricing: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=278931#comment-557629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Federal Communications Commission implementation of rules around network neutrality on Tuesday may open up a change in the way carriers price mobile broadband &#8212; and it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Federal Communications Commission implementation of rules around network neutrality on Tuesday may open up a change in the way carriers price mobile broadband &#8212; and it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/21/a-net-neutrality-timeline-how-we-got-here/#comment-556747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=278931#comment-556747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a consumer, I rather pay more to content providers online than to ISPs for access. Furthermore, long term, I rather ISPs have more capital for upgrades and maintenence because infrastructure is rare and critical. Regardless, it is all but certain that government intervention in industry will slow innovation and investment. Luckily, this order should be reversed via the congressional review act early next year. Hollah!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a consumer, I rather pay more to content providers online than to ISPs for access. Furthermore, long term, I rather ISPs have more capital for upgrades and maintenence because infrastructure is rare and critical. Regardless, it is all but certain that government intervention in industry will slow innovation and investment. Luckily, this order should be reversed via the congressional review act early next year. Hollah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What The Web Is Saying: Net Neutrality Rules</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/21/a-net-neutrality-timeline-how-we-got-here/#comment-556711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What The Web Is Saying: Net Neutrality Rules]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=278931#comment-556711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Internet but will leave wireless with less safeguards than wired broadband. My colleague Stacey is tracking the news in Washington and its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet but will leave wireless with less safeguards than wired broadband. My colleague Stacey is tracking the news in Washington and its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What The Web Is Saying: Net Neutrality Rules: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/21/a-net-neutrality-timeline-how-we-got-here/#comment-556628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What The Web Is Saying: Net Neutrality Rules: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=278931#comment-556628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Internet but will leave wireless with less safeguards than wired broadband. My colleague Stacey is tracking the news in Washington and its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internet but will leave wireless with less safeguards than wired broadband. My colleague Stacey is tracking the news in Washington and its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Prior</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/21/a-net-neutrality-timeline-how-we-got-here/#comment-556517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Prior]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=278931#comment-556517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julius Genachowski is Wesley Mouch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julius Genachowski is Wesley Mouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bennett</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/21/a-net-neutrality-timeline-how-we-got-here/#comment-556508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=278931#comment-556508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reasonable people will differ as to whether the last minute changes improve or impair the order; I think the presumptive ban on priority transit is arbitrary and likely to be challenged in court. If Akamai can sell it, so can AT&amp;T.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reasonable people will differ as to whether the last minute changes improve or impair the order; I think the presumptive ban on priority transit is arbitrary and likely to be challenged in court. If Akamai can sell it, so can AT&amp;T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
