Comments on: Level 3: Comcast Lied About Dispute, Broke NDA http://gigaom.com/2010/12/20/level-3-comcast-lied-broke-nda/ Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:11:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: 8675309 http://gigaom.com/2010/12/20/level-3-comcast-lied-broke-nda/#comment-557559 Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:56:56 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=278391#comment-557559 Does anyone else find it hysterical that in the same letter where Level3 accuses Comcast of releasing info under NDA (in what was considered by commenters as an overly-vague blog post) that Level3 gives specific detail on the Comcast/Level3 interconnects and the secret “newly developed” proposal that I’d assume were also under NDA?

It’s amateur hour over in the L3 press room.

]]> By: CD http://gigaom.com/2010/12/20/level-3-comcast-lied-broke-nda/#comment-556276 Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:35:43 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=278391#comment-556276 The problem with L3′s argument and the NDA is that it was most likely them who made this dispute public in the first place. Comcast is trying to get the NBCU merger approved and the last thing they want is this type of controversy to disrupt that. Perfect timing for L3 to make this a big deal about how Comcast is going to block the web, and get what the pricing terms they want.

Except people aren’t really buying what L3 is selling, even against such a maligned company like Comcast. So now they say that Comcast is violating a NDA?! Live by the sword, die by the sword.

]]>