9 Comments

Summary:

10gen, the company providing commercial support for the open-source MongoDB database, has raised $6.5 million in funding led by Sequoia Capital. Its CEO says NoSQL will become the third leg of the data storage stool for enterprises, and MongoDB is in the lead.

iStock_000006412772XSmall

Updated. 10gen, the company providing commercial support for the open-source MongoDB database, has raised $6.5 million in third-round funding led by Sequoia Capital, with participation from prior investors Flybridge Capital Partners and Union Square Ventures. The money will help the company expand.

When I chatted with CEO and Co-Founder Dwight Merriman, I was more interested in how MongoDB fits into the world of NoSQL startups and how the myriad companies out there pushing other open-source database technologies could fare as they hop from customized and free deployments in web companies to building a business around paying enterprise customers. Merriman said he doesn’t believe most enterprise will have a need for a slew of customized NoSQL data technologies, but will rather end up using a combination of databases: the traditional SQL relational databases for transactions and reporting, a business intelligence data storage and warehousing product, and a NoSQL product for unstructured data.

10gen is hoping MongoDB dominates in the NoSQL category, and Merriman says with 90,000 downloads per month and considerable traction among the developer community, MongoDB is in the lead — ahead of couchDB and Cassandra. “No one is going to use eight different tools for eight different problems,” Merriman said. “The NoSQL space is one space, and popular products in that space in the long run will deliver scaling and agility of development. There won’t be 10 tools in the toolbox; it’s not that granular, and it’s just too much.”

Merriman’s confidence may be misplaced, as the jury is still out as to whether enterprises (or that many enterprises) will adopt NoSQL technologies, especially as startups attempt to tweak SQL databases to perform faster. It’s still early days, too, and there are plenty of startups raising funds to become the biggest NoSQL player on the block. (For that matter, there are plenty on the SQL side too.) For example, earlier this year Riptano raised $2.7 million to support Cassandra in the enterprise, and Membase launched (as Northscale) and scored $15 million to pursue a Memcached-based data store.

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. “The NoSQL space is one space”

    That’s not true – there are 3-4 distinct kinds of NoSQL storage systems, of which Mongo fits into only 1 category.

  2. Frank Mashraqi Friday, December 3, 2010

    @Tony is right.

    There are four storage formats generally in use for storage in NoSQL systems:

    1. Document Oriented: document format can be binary (BSON in MongoDB) or text (JSON in CouchDB)
    2. Key-Value Pairs: Most document oriented storage formats are stored as key-value pairs
    3. Column Oriented
    4. Graph Oriented

    /mashraqi

  3. Frank Mashraqi Friday, December 3, 2010

    “No one is going to use eight different tools for eight different problem”

    Great! Let’s treat to solve each problem with the hammer because that’s all we got? In big data world, that’s just like shooting yourself in the foot in slow motion.

    Frank

  4. Hi, I do believe it is more or less one space, and I think you are right that my pov isn’t the conventional wisdom so far. The ‘nosql’ products do vary, for examples on these dimensions:

    – data model
    – consistency model
    – distribution model (bigtable style partitioning vs. amazon dynamo consistent hashing)

    However, many of the use cases that these products solve are in common despite the different approaches to attacking the problem. Thus I don’t think of it as different spaces, but rather different approaches to the same problem. In theory, the doc/column/kv data models all scale horizontally.

    I do think of graph oriented as separate. If you have a graph problem, graph dbs can be really good. If your problem is not intrinsically a graph, I would look more widely.

  5. ITbende » Post Topic » ITbende podcast nr 80: WikiLeaks & FreedomLeaks Friday, December 10, 2010

    [...] – FreedomLeaks – Google Wave Developer Blog: Introducing Apache Wave – 10gen Raises $6.5M to Dominate the NoSQL Space – [...]

  6. Handicapping Big Data Tools — Which Ones Will Thrive?: Cloud « Thursday, December 23, 2010

    [...] databases (Riptano (Cassandra); Membase (Membase Server); Cloudant (CouchDB); 10gen (MongoDB); Basho (Riak); VMware (Redis); Apache Software Foundation (HBase); Objectivity [...]

  7. NoSQL Consolidation Begins: Meet Couchbase: Cloud Computing News « Monday, February 7, 2011

    [...] and are doing good work to advance their respective projects, but if 10gen CEO Dwight Merriman is correct that “[t]he NoSQL space is one space” and that “no one is going to use eight different tools for eight different problems,” [...]

  8. NoSQL Startup Basho Raises $7.5M for Riak: Cloud Computing News « Wednesday, February 9, 2011

    [...] in terms of financing. MongoDB peddler 10gen has raised $11.4 million thus far (including a $6.5 million round in December), and although CouchOne only raised $2 million for its CouchDB efforts, it has merged itself with [...]

  9. Are Big Data Startups Eyeing the Enterprise Already?: Cloud Computing News « Thursday, February 17, 2011

    [...] and these types of changes can be significant. They suggest to me that Karmasphere and 10gen have established sufficient developer bases and are satisfied enough with the core technologies to start making their enterprise pushes. If they don’t succeed, they can’t blame [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post