23 Comments

Summary:

In 2008, Beth Kanter blogged about how much time it should take to implement social media. She created a diagram to illustrate the main social media activities and the hours per week it takes to implement them. I’ve created my own up-to-date version of the figure.

socialmediatime.001

In 2008, consultant and author Beth Kanter blogged about how much time it should take to implement social media. She created a  diagram to illustrate the main social media activities and the hours per week it takes to implement them, and I’ve used it ever since as a reference point in slide presentations for folks who have yet to embrace social media.

The diagram put the big unknown of one’s social media marketing time commitment into perspective. Kanter’s diagram was by no means discouraging, but led people to say “OK, I will start with listening — that seems manageable.” And that was just what many of us advise people to do when just starting out with social media marketing: Listen.

Two years later, and things have evolved in several ways:

  1. There are more tools available to help us take part in social media activities.
  2. There are more best practices for newbies to find and follow.
  3. There are many tips published online on how to be more efficient in one’s efforts.

I have a new presentation coming up this week to an audience at varying stages of social media adoption, but mostly on the early end of the spectrum. I’m sure I’ll once again get the question “But how long does it take?” So I played around with Kanter’s original diagram to create my own. I wanted to illustrate not only how long each activity should take, but also to identify additional tools that can be useful in each area:

This diagram is by no means perfect, but I’m striving to keep it easy to understand for the layperson. I also wanted to address some of the efficiencies we’ve worked out the more we’ve used these tools. For example, I blogged about how to mine Twitter’s wealth in 15 minutes a day. I wanted to show that you don’t need to spend hours a day on Twitter or Facebook or the like to be effective in your efforts.

I reordered “Participate” and “Generate Buzz” activities from Kanter’s original diagram, and renamed the latter “Promote.”  I reordered them because we now have tools that make promoting something (generating buzz) so much speedier. Participating — even at a cursory level of engagement — really takes more time and consideration even though useful tools are also there. The tools may make it easier for us to monitor and participate in our social media channels, but we are now monitoring and participating in many more channels than before.

What I tried to avoid was listing all of the hundreds of apps that could fit in under each category; instead I referenced the more popular and effective tools to give a sense of what one can use. The main goal of this is to show the person new to all things social media that it doesn’t have to take an unmanageable amount of time to handle your social media activities but as you want to connect more deeply and leverage your social channels more strongly, you will cumulatively rack up the need for a greater time commitment.

I hope this diagram — or a future iteration of it — becomes a useful slide in any Social Media 101 presentation. Eventually, this, too, will become obsolete or irrelevant, but until then, how can it be improved?

What is my diagram missing? Where is it off base? Where is it right on the money?

Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub. req.):

  1. Really insightful post which articulates the thoughts running round my head about how much time I’ve been investing in SM and for what. Love the way you’ve taken Beth’s concept to the next level. Great thought leadership…

    Share
  2. Paulo del Puerto Thursday, December 2, 2010

    Good article. Very helpful insights. Thanks for this!

    Share
  3. Excellent diagram and very useful to many who present social media. It would be excellent if it had a Creative Commons license so we can embed it or use it in a presentation – with due credit of course!

    Share
  4. I think the number of hours listed on the publish/content creation side, at 3-5 hrs a week is a bit too much on the lower side. Especially if you throw in video.
    Pro bloggers estimate 20 minutes to a post (text). I am not there yet myself, so don’t see newbies doing those numbers (meaningful consistent content in 3-5 hrs a week) when they start out.
    In any case, like you said, its not perfect but a great start! Thanks for getting us thinking.

    Share
  5. Good article I love the visual. It’s very help in thinking through how much time to allot and not get overwhelmed.

    Share
  6. Great concept! Implementing this would be another story. Social media can sometimes be a distraction if you’re not mindful. It’s not easy to get entangled with a thought provoking post or a conversation and thus makes the time a big challenge. I’m everyone is guilty of this every so often.

    Share
  7. Really good post that can help new beginners to demystify the strategic use of social media as an effective branding channel.

    Share
  8. I would argue that Flickr is a social network for photographers, but I realize I’m getting granular here. Anyways, nice post.

    Share
  9. Very helpful and insightful. This is a question that seems to be at the forefront for many small businesses, usually coupled to the claim “I haven’t got the time”. Does anyone have comparable information for the time spent on conventional mrketing channels?

    Share
  10. professionalmojo Thursday, December 2, 2010

    Great visual and extension of Beth’s original diagram. Newbies should love this – and also will likely be shocked that it does take more than 5 minutes a day. To do it right is, indeed, an investment. Thanks for the post.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post