<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC&#8217;s New Net Neutrality Rules to Regulate Wireless Lightly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/12/01/fccs-new-net-neutrality-rules-to-regulate-wireless-lightly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/01/fccs-new-net-neutrality-rules-to-regulate-wireless-lightly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surprise! Akamai&#8217;s Mobile Play Isn&#8217;t About Video: Broadband News and Analysis &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/01/fccs-new-net-neutrality-rules-to-regulate-wireless-lightly/#comment-593435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Surprise! Akamai&#8217;s Mobile Play Isn&#8217;t About Video: Broadband News and Analysis &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=266093#comment-593435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the Commission gave mobile operators more leeway in the way they could manage and monetize network traffic. With CDN technology built in to mobile [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Commission gave mobile operators more leeway in the way they could manage and monetize network traffic. With CDN technology built in to mobile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Level 3 v. Comcast Says About the FCC&#8217;s Obsolescence: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/01/fccs-new-net-neutrality-rules-to-regulate-wireless-lightly/#comment-553805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What Level 3 v. Comcast Says About the FCC&#8217;s Obsolescence: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=266093#comment-553805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] So as it offers up a network neutrality framework on Tuesday at its open meeting, it has had to bow to industry demands and weaken its original ideas and stance. Yet, even as it caves, the Bells and cable companies are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So as it offers up a network neutrality framework on Tuesday at its open meeting, it has had to bow to industry demands and weaken its original ideas and stance. Yet, even as it caves, the Bells and cable companies are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Röda sillar &#171; Stenskott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/01/fccs-new-net-neutrality-rules-to-regulate-wireless-lightly/#comment-545299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Röda sillar &#171; Stenskott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=266093#comment-545299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] bevarad nätneutralitet för mobila uppkopplade apparater. Kommissionär Kroes verkar ligga ungefär i linje med FCC: på trådat bredband kanske det inte är så, på trådlöst bredband är det definitivt okej. Men [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bevarad nätneutralitet för mobila uppkopplade apparater. Kommissionär Kroes verkar ligga ungefär i linje med FCC: på trådat bredband kanske det inte är så, på trådlöst bredband är det definitivt okej. Men [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCC Opens the Door for Metered Web Access: Tech News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/01/fccs-new-net-neutrality-rules-to-regulate-wireless-lightly/#comment-529755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FCC Opens the Door for Metered Web Access: Tech News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=266093#comment-529755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Kim already outlined some of the other elements of the proposal, such as its weaker provisions protecting traffic on wireless networks and it&#8217;s reliance on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kim already outlined some of the other elements of the proposal, such as its weaker provisions protecting traffic on wireless networks and it&#8217;s reliance on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed Katz</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/12/01/fccs-new-net-neutrality-rules-to-regulate-wireless-lightly/#comment-529575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jed Katz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=266093#comment-529575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been a tech entrepreneur and then a venture capitalist my entire career, and I&#039;ve studied this issue closely, because it is so important for the technology start-up community.  I applaud this approach by Chairman Genachowski.  It is practical, it is reasonable, and it accomplishes exactly what we all need accomplished.  I believe the entrepreneurial community will embrace this framework, building their businesses with much more confidence that the playing field is level, unreasonable discrimination will not be tolerated, and that transparency will allow the FCC to take further action if necessary to protect a landscape of fair competition.  This allows the FCC to be the cop on the beat, making sure that companies of all sizes/ages/etc have the same ability to thrive as established companies, without fear of unfair competition.  I urge you to consider this proposal carefully, and show support so this can get passed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a tech entrepreneur and then a venture capitalist my entire career, and I&#8217;ve studied this issue closely, because it is so important for the technology start-up community.  I applaud this approach by Chairman Genachowski.  It is practical, it is reasonable, and it accomplishes exactly what we all need accomplished.  I believe the entrepreneurial community will embrace this framework, building their businesses with much more confidence that the playing field is level, unreasonable discrimination will not be tolerated, and that transparency will allow the FCC to take further action if necessary to protect a landscape of fair competition.  This allows the FCC to be the cop on the beat, making sure that companies of all sizes/ages/etc have the same ability to thrive as established companies, without fear of unfair competition.  I urge you to consider this proposal carefully, and show support so this can get passed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
