If once is a fluke and twice is a trend, we can maybe confirm what we’ve been saying all along: that cord cutting is something the cable industry needs to worry about. According to new data, 119,000 pay TV subscribers dropped service in the third quarter.

cable cut

If once is a fluke and twice is a trend, then maybe we can finally confirm what we’ve been saying all along: Cord cutting is something the cable industry needs to start worrying about. According to the latest data from market research firm SNL Kagan, 119,000 pay TV subscribers dropped service in the third quarter, marking the second consecutive quarter — and the second quarter ever — that the industry has lost customers.

We were criticized when we reported that four of the top five cable companies announced during earnings that they had collectively lost more than 500,000 subscribers, in part because we didn’t take into account gains made by satellite and IPTV providers. Add those in, and the number of subscribers gained or lost by eight of the top nine multichannel video distributors was about even. But when you factor in subscriber losses from smaller, non-public Tier 2 and Tier 3 cable providers, the picture darkens for the cable industry.

SNL Kagan reported today that cable providers lost 741,000 subscribers in the third quarter, which compares to 711,000 subs lost in Q2, and is the largest drop that the industry has ever seen. While some of those subscribers transitioned to IPTV services from providers like AT&T and Verizon, which added 476,000 customers in the third quarter, or satellite providers like Dish Network or DirecTV, which together added 145,000 subscribers during the period, it wasn’t enough to stem the losses from cable.

That means over the last two quarters, 335,000 basic cable subscribers have decided to go without. That’s a drop in the bucket compared to the 100 million or so households that subscribe to cable and other pay TV services, but it points to a worrying trend for distributors, which are seeing their subscriber numbers slowly eroding.

It’s especially worrying because research firms like Nielsen and SNL Kagan have been quick to dismiss the idea that subscribers might actually be canceling their pay TV subscriptions, and also because the third and fourth quarters are typically the strongest periods for customer acquisition. Indeed, SNL Kagan analyst Mariam Rondeli told us last time around that the subscriber drop was “unique” and that the firm expected the industry to rebound in the latest quarter:

“[Rondeli] said that the continuing recession and its impact on the job and housing market seem to make people rethink their subscriptions. However, she doesn’t believe all is lost for cable and other forms of pay TV. ‘We do think the second quarter was unique,’ she told me. SNL Kagan expects the industry to gain a total of 900,000 subscribers in the third and fourth quarter.”

Rondeli also said that she doesn’t see over-the-top video as a driving factor behind the current losses, but she cautioned not to ignore online video.”

Now Kagan is changing its tune, and even said that online video might be behind the subscriber losses after all. In the firm’s most recent release, Senior Analyst Ian Olgeirson is quoted as saying: “[I]t is becoming increasingly difficult to dismiss the impact of over-the-top substitution on video subscriber performance, particularly after seeing declines during the period of the year that tends to produce the largest subscriber gains due to seasonal shifts back to television viewing and subscription packages.”

So far, pay TV distributors and network operators have been loathe to acknowledge the trend, with executives from Comcast, Time Warner, Viacom, Time Warner Cable and others saying that they don’t see cord cutting — or online video — as a threat. But it’s clear that the $100 cable bill (which is increasing by 10 percent per year in many cases) is not sustainable, especially as users find other ways to find content, online and otherwise.

Photo courtesy of (CC-BY-SA) Flickr user Akarsh Simha.

Check out the most recent episode of our new show Cord Cutters below:

Related content on GigaOM Pro: (subscription required)

  1. As a cord-cutting wannabe, it would be helpful for a site like yours to put together a complete compendium of how to cut the cord. Addressing such issues as what TV antennas are best, how will your new viewing options stack up against cable/satellite options, etc..

    1. Jim, you might want to take a look at Lifehacker’s guide to dropping cable and going online for your TV. http://lifehacker.com/5667680/ditching-cable-for-the-web-how-much-can-you-save-buying-renting-or-streaming-tv

    2. It’s already happening, check out their weekly Cord Cutters show.

    3. Hi Jim, that’s exactly what we’re trying to do with cord cutters. Check out the most revcent episode and links to all previous shows (including one about antennas) here:


      And if you have any specific questions, feel free to email us at cordcutters@gigaom.com

  2. Good reporting and worth watching BUT this means that total pay TV subscribers dropped by about one tenth of one percent (i.e. 1.4 out of 1000) since there are over 80M subs in the US. This at a time when unemployment is at 9% and household formation is very low.

  3. As a long ago cord cutter for content, cables relevancy for TV has long ago passed into antiquity for me. Now, if there were alternatives to using them for broadband, they would gladly be relegated to extinct dinosaur status. But with their covert monopolistic practices, I unfortunately dont see that being a possibility anytime soon.

    I cant wait for the day when I cn utter the words ‘Conventional Cable, RIP.’

  4. The worst move cable ever made was to introduce DVRs. They allow customers to survey and record the entire cable schedule. Customers soon discover 99.9% of all programing is repeated.

    It doesn’t take long for subscribers to realize the $100/month cable fee is not good value for money. Customers are being charged over and over again for the same trash content, and that’s on the channels they wanted to subscribe to. That doesn’t include those channels they were coerced into buying as part of an bloated package.

    Being systematically ripped off forces subscribers to look for alternatives and with broadband there are a growing list of options. I cut the cable 4 years ago and don’t regret not having to pay for trash cable content such as “American Chopper”

  5. [...] most cable companies, Time Warner Cable has blamed the rough economy for its subscriber woes, and the TV Essentials [...]

  6. [...] GigaOm) Tweet Bookmark [...]

  7. [...] The decision by pay TV providers to drop low-rated networks is happening as distributors are coming under pressure to pay ever-increasing fees to programmers. In most cases, those costs get passed on to the consumer in the form of higher cable bills. But with cable bills rising about 8 percent over the past year, it’s clear that continually raising rates is unsustainable. Rather than pay increasing fees, some consumers have begun canceling their cable or satellite subscriptions altogether, as the number of people who pay for TV has dropped for two consecutive quarters. [...]

  8. [...] SNL Kagan reported that over the past two quarters, more than 330,000 households have canceled their pay TV subscriptions. For ESPN, that should equal a decline in potential subscriber revenue. The programmer pulls in [...]

  9. [...] Cord cutting was on everyone’s mind in 2010, dominating the talk at industry events like our own NewTeeVee Live conference in November. However, we’re the first ones to admit that it’s not exactly mainstream yet. Close to 90 percent of U.S. households still subscribe to pay TV in one form or another. We saw the pendulum swing for the first time in 2010, with pay TV subscription numbers declining for the first time ever in Q2, only to be followed by another decline in Q3. [...]

  10. As you say, the loss of TV subscriptions is “a drop in the bucket compared to the 100 million or so households that subscribe to cable and other pay TV services.”

    This is more like statistical noise than a trend: Net losses for the year are well below 1% of active subscriptions.


Comments have been disabled for this post