<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barriers to Remote Work: It&#8217;s The Mindset, Not the Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/10/19/barriers-to-remote-work-its-the-mindset-not-the-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/19/barriers-to-remote-work-its-the-mindset-not-the-tools/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Okay to Work at the Kitchen Table: Online Collaboration &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/19/barriers-to-remote-work-its-the-mindset-not-the-tools/#comment-569986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It&#8217;s Okay to Work at the Kitchen Table: Online Collaboration &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=167335#comment-569986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] my business have boundaries? Yes, but they&#8217;re more like gray areas. I’m a web worker, but I also have Internet-free [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my business have boundaries? Yes, but they&#8217;re more like gray areas. I’m a web worker, but I also have Internet-free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Key Questions That Will Be Answered at Net:Work: Business Collaboration News &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/19/barriers-to-remote-work-its-the-mindset-not-the-tools/#comment-520611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[10 Key Questions That Will Be Answered at Net:Work: Business Collaboration News &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=167335#comment-520611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] does the campus of the future look like? As more employees demand the ability to work remotely, the campuses of the future will address different needs of those today. How do flexi-spaces and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] does the campus of the future look like? As more employees demand the ability to work remotely, the campuses of the future will address different needs of those today. How do flexi-spaces and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Lister</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/19/barriers-to-remote-work-its-the-mindset-not-the-tools/#comment-491810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate Lister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=167335#comment-491810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think if the SMB&#039;s saw the cost advantage, they&#039;d be more apt to deploy remote work strategies. 

A Telework Research Network study shows that a company could save $1,100,000 if they allowed 100 workers to work at home just half the time. For an SMB, a savings of $10,000 per employee is a big deal.

Conducted independently, the study quantifies the business, individual, and societal impact that regular telecommuting could have on the nation, and for small to mid-size companies. Nationwide, the impact would exceed $645 billion.

Businesses with 100 teleworkers would annually:

- Increase productivity by $575,000 by getting more work done with the same number of people
- Save $304,000 in real estate, electricity, and related costs
- Save $113,000 in absenteeism related costs
- Save $76,000 in employee turnover
- Improve continuity of operations
- Avoid environmental sanctions, city access fees, etc.
- Improve work life balance and better address the needs of families, parents, and senior caregivers.
- Avoid the ‘brain drain’ effect of retiring boomers by allowing them to work flexibly
- Be able to recruit and retain the best people
- Better address the needs of disabled workers, rural residents, and military families

More than 30% of U.S. workers say they&#039;d take a pay cut for the opportunity to work at home. Eighty percent of U.S. workers say they want to telecommute. 40% hold jobs that are compatible. Yet still, less than 2% of U.S. employees (not including the self-employed) consider home their primary place of work.

The Telework Research Network&#039;s findings have been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, Harvard Business Review, and dozens of other publications. A free calculator that allows communities and companies calculate their own potential telework savings is available on their website at http://TeleworkResearchNetwork.com. Similar models for the U.K. and Canadian markets are currently being developed.

Kate Lister, Principal Researcher 
TeleworkResearchNetwork.com
Co-Author of Undress For Success—The Naked Truth About Making Money at Home (Wiley 2009)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if the SMB&#8217;s saw the cost advantage, they&#8217;d be more apt to deploy remote work strategies. </p>
<p>A Telework Research Network study shows that a company could save $1,100,000 if they allowed 100 workers to work at home just half the time. For an SMB, a savings of $10,000 per employee is a big deal.</p>
<p>Conducted independently, the study quantifies the business, individual, and societal impact that regular telecommuting could have on the nation, and for small to mid-size companies. Nationwide, the impact would exceed $645 billion.</p>
<p>Businesses with 100 teleworkers would annually:</p>
<p>- Increase productivity by $575,000 by getting more work done with the same number of people<br />
- Save $304,000 in real estate, electricity, and related costs<br />
- Save $113,000 in absenteeism related costs<br />
- Save $76,000 in employee turnover<br />
- Improve continuity of operations<br />
- Avoid environmental sanctions, city access fees, etc.<br />
- Improve work life balance and better address the needs of families, parents, and senior caregivers.<br />
- Avoid the ‘brain drain’ effect of retiring boomers by allowing them to work flexibly<br />
- Be able to recruit and retain the best people<br />
- Better address the needs of disabled workers, rural residents, and military families</p>
<p>More than 30% of U.S. workers say they&#8217;d take a pay cut for the opportunity to work at home. Eighty percent of U.S. workers say they want to telecommute. 40% hold jobs that are compatible. Yet still, less than 2% of U.S. employees (not including the self-employed) consider home their primary place of work.</p>
<p>The Telework Research Network&#8217;s findings have been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, Harvard Business Review, and dozens of other publications. A free calculator that allows communities and companies calculate their own potential telework savings is available on their website at <a href="http://TeleworkResearchNetwork.com" rel="nofollow">http://TeleworkResearchNetwork.com</a>. Similar models for the U.K. and Canadian markets are currently being developed.</p>
<p>Kate Lister, Principal Researcher<br />
TeleworkResearchNetwork.com<br />
Co-Author of Undress For Success—The Naked Truth About Making Money at Home (Wiley 2009)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Moles</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/19/barriers-to-remote-work-its-the-mindset-not-the-tools/#comment-303947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Moles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 05:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=167335#comment-303947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re absolutely right, It&#039;s high time the SMBs realize the benefits of remote working. There are some really cool tools like Taroby www.taroby.com which makes remote working easier. But what you need is the mindset to explore the opportunities remote working provides to the employees as well as the organization.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, It&#8217;s high time the SMBs realize the benefits of remote working. There are some really cool tools like Taroby <a href="http://www.taroby.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.taroby.com</a> which makes remote working easier. But what you need is the mindset to explore the opportunities remote working provides to the employees as well as the organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Patel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/19/barriers-to-remote-work-its-the-mindset-not-the-tools/#comment-302068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Patel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=167335#comment-302068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guess what. There are no difference between you and the guy in China and India when you can work remotely. There are existing consulting firms like IBM promoting remote employees. And when they are remote workers, the job changed to an Indian job. If you count that into the charts then you probably will be surprised on the difference with the above chart.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess what. There are no difference between you and the guy in China and India when you can work remotely. There are existing consulting firms like IBM promoting remote employees. And when they are remote workers, the job changed to an Indian job. If you count that into the charts then you probably will be surprised on the difference with the above chart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frgough</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/19/barriers-to-remote-work-its-the-mindset-not-the-tools/#comment-301166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frgough]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=167335#comment-301166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m getting tired of articles like this with lots of pretty charts and graphs and pulling all sorts of conclusions out of a hat. There is ZERO information presented about the TYPES of jobs the surveys represented - were the types of jobs represented in identical percentages between the US and UK? If not, then the data is worthless. Larger companies are more likely to have large sales and marketing teams, while SMBs might be lucky to have one person. Do the large companies include travelling service technicians in their numbers? Also please note that most short haul travel in Europe is by train, where there is far less of a hassle to setup and work. Is Europe suffering the same backlash against coffee-shop slugs that the US is? You know, the people who take up a seat in the coffee shop and order one cup of coffee while sitting for 5 hours?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting tired of articles like this with lots of pretty charts and graphs and pulling all sorts of conclusions out of a hat. There is ZERO information presented about the TYPES of jobs the surveys represented &#8211; were the types of jobs represented in identical percentages between the US and UK? If not, then the data is worthless. Larger companies are more likely to have large sales and marketing teams, while SMBs might be lucky to have one person. Do the large companies include travelling service technicians in their numbers? Also please note that most short haul travel in Europe is by train, where there is far less of a hassle to setup and work. Is Europe suffering the same backlash against coffee-shop slugs that the US is? You know, the people who take up a seat in the coffee shop and order one cup of coffee while sitting for 5 hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avdi Grimm</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/19/barriers-to-remote-work-its-the-mindset-not-the-tools/#comment-300993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avdi Grimm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=167335#comment-300993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting data. I&#039;m doing my best to help organizational leaders become more comfortable with distributed work by putting the stories and lessons learned by successful dispersed teams online at &lt;a href=&quot;http://wideteams.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wide Teams&lt;/a&gt;. I hope that as more of us share our stories the attitudes will change for the better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting data. I&#8217;m doing my best to help organizational leaders become more comfortable with distributed work by putting the stories and lessons learned by successful dispersed teams online at <a href="http://wideteams.com" rel="nofollow">Wide Teams</a>. I hope that as more of us share our stories the attitudes will change for the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
