<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadband Speed Is the Tail Wagging the Policy Dog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The State of the Union, the Economy and Broadband: Broadband News and Analysis &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/#comment-580971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The State of the Union, the Economy and Broadband: Broadband News and Analysis &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=166515#comment-580971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We must demand more in setting our nation&#8217;s broadband goals; broadband speeds for&#160;rural America&#160;of 4 Mbps as a&#160;10-year&#160;goal (so long for so little) threaten to abandon these communities to a ghetto of unfulfilled potential. Even 100 Mbps will soon be scoffed at as inadequate for a world-leading country. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We must demand more in setting our nation&#8217;s broadband goals; broadband speeds for&nbsp;rural America&nbsp;of 4 Mbps as a&nbsp;10-year&nbsp;goal (so long for so little) threaten to abandon these communities to a ghetto of unfulfilled potential. Even 100 Mbps will soon be scoffed at as inadequate for a world-leading country. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top 5 Tech Policy Issues of 2011</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/#comment-570598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top 5 Tech Policy Issues of 2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=166515#comment-570598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] between Craig Settles and NBP Director Blair Levin.  You can read their back and forth at GigaOm: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] between Craig Settles and NBP Director Blair Levin.  You can read their back and forth at GigaOm: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/#comment-300321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Mitchell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=166515#comment-300321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig is right that 4Mbps is pathetic as a goal for anything after 2010.  However, we also need to pay greater attention to reliability and other metrics that are crucial for a productive broadband experience.

As for the discussion about upload speeds, I know that Craig knows how crucial it is we radically improve the pathetic upload speeds most have.  I&#039;m glad to see so many commenters making it a key issue.  It would be nice if even a few in the Obama Administration recognized that when making policy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig is right that 4Mbps is pathetic as a goal for anything after 2010.  However, we also need to pay greater attention to reliability and other metrics that are crucial for a productive broadband experience.</p>
<p>As for the discussion about upload speeds, I know that Craig knows how crucial it is we radically improve the pathetic upload speeds most have.  I&#8217;m glad to see so many commenters making it a key issue.  It would be nice if even a few in the Obama Administration recognized that when making policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Deans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/#comment-300303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David H. Deans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=166515#comment-300303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig, next time you perform a study of the U.S. market, I suggest you reach out to SMBs that create multimedia content -- and regularly upload files to Web hosting sites. Then, ask them how effectively they can compete with their global competitors.

My point: you&#039;ll quickly discover that uplink speed matters to those who already experience the current constraints of the laggard U.S. broadband access benchmark.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, next time you perform a study of the U.S. market, I suggest you reach out to SMBs that create multimedia content &#8212; and regularly upload files to Web hosting sites. Then, ask them how effectively they can compete with their global competitors.</p>
<p>My point: you&#8217;ll quickly discover that uplink speed matters to those who already experience the current constraints of the laggard U.S. broadband access benchmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ondrej</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/#comment-300046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ondrej]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=166515#comment-300046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+1 UPLOAD. Download is uninspiring, but well functional these days. Upload is what stops us from really doing more. Give me 6mb/s up/down before toying with in 100mb/s down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 UPLOAD. Download is uninspiring, but well functional these days. Upload is what stops us from really doing more. Give me 6mb/s up/down before toying with in 100mb/s down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/#comment-300033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=166515#comment-300033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t address &quot;the need to catch up&quot; question because (as with speeds) I think the focus on this misses the bigger point, which is that a heavy focus on speeds and speed comparisons with other countries take us away from discussing &quot;how do we meet the need to improve business productivity, competitiveness, etc.&quot; 

There is definitely a lack of significant empirical research out there on this stuff, which is what makes from econ dev folks crazy because they have lots of anecdotal evidence that there is a relationship. This is why I&#039;ll look at a community and ask &quot;if 80% of your businesses wanting to do cloud computing and run video conferencing applications in order for them to open new markets, then what capacity do you need a network to have to achieve that goal?

You have to ignore all of those stories about the US failing to catch up with the rest of the world (not an easy thing to do), and look at your specific community to ask &quot;if we want to achieve &quot;b&quot; or &quot;d&quot; economic outcome, can broadband help? And if so, at what speed and what type of broadband will help?&quot;

I conducted the research in part to create a general picture of where broadband can impact economic development, and partly to get an idea of what kinds of speeds may be adequate to enable communities to reach important goals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t address &#8220;the need to catch up&#8221; question because (as with speeds) I think the focus on this misses the bigger point, which is that a heavy focus on speeds and speed comparisons with other countries take us away from discussing &#8220;how do we meet the need to improve business productivity, competitiveness, etc.&#8221; </p>
<p>There is definitely a lack of significant empirical research out there on this stuff, which is what makes from econ dev folks crazy because they have lots of anecdotal evidence that there is a relationship. This is why I&#8217;ll look at a community and ask &#8220;if 80% of your businesses wanting to do cloud computing and run video conferencing applications in order for them to open new markets, then what capacity do you need a network to have to achieve that goal?</p>
<p>You have to ignore all of those stories about the US failing to catch up with the rest of the world (not an easy thing to do), and look at your specific community to ask &#8220;if we want to achieve &#8220;b&#8221; or &#8220;d&#8221; economic outcome, can broadband help? And if so, at what speed and what type of broadband will help?&#8221;</p>
<p>I conducted the research in part to create a general picture of where broadband can impact economic development, and partly to get an idea of what kinds of speeds may be adequate to enable communities to reach important goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roofTip</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/#comment-300025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roofTip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=166515#comment-300025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m excited to see the rural areas manage and upgrade these cutting edge 100M+ networks when they come out. It also makes sense that everyone would want something that appears to be necessary and for the lowest possible cost. It is too bad this &quot;need&quot; will encourage poorly thought out ideas and execution to match.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m excited to see the rural areas manage and upgrade these cutting edge 100M+ networks when they come out. It also makes sense that everyone would want something that appears to be necessary and for the lowest possible cost. It is too bad this &#8220;need&#8221; will encourage poorly thought out ideas and execution to match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Levine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/#comment-300021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Levine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 21:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=166515#comment-300021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about on an even more basic level. I mean, if you look at countries with fast Internet access, is there any evidence that it&#039;s helped them? Internet access obviously boosts efficiency. But does that boost scale along with the speed? And is that advantage absolute or relative? The stuff you&#039;re talking about - attracting business to an area - is all relative. (You have to have better access than other areas, which could mean anything.) All I read about is how we&#039;re falling behind, but what does that mean? Are there _any_ studies on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about on an even more basic level. I mean, if you look at countries with fast Internet access, is there any evidence that it&#8217;s helped them? Internet access obviously boosts efficiency. But does that boost scale along with the speed? And is that advantage absolute or relative? The stuff you&#8217;re talking about &#8211; attracting business to an area &#8211; is all relative. (You have to have better access than other areas, which could mean anything.) All I read about is how we&#8217;re falling behind, but what does that mean? Are there _any_ studies on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/#comment-300015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=166515#comment-300015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rob, your question points to one of the problems with DC&#039;s fixation with speed. We subsequently lead off many discussions about broadband by comparing the US with other countries&#039; speed. Speed for speed&#039;s sake and/or an &quot;arms&quot; race with other countries miss the point.

For example, in a recent needs analysis I did for Benicia, CA, I asked businesses 1) what computing/business operations tasks do you want to do now, and 2) what do you want to be able to do in 3 - 5 years. Concurrently, the city told me they want to draw businesses of a certain type to the area, and one of the commercial real estate people explained from his experience what kind of speeds companies are looking for when shopping for a new location. 

In all three cases, the focus is on what do &quot;x&quot; constituency/stakeholder groups want to achieve that will in turn impact economic outcomes. Then we have to figure out what speeds are going to facilitate reaching the stated objectives in the short and the long term. Some communities may be able to reach their specific objectives with 5 Mbps. Others may be able to reach them with 10 Mbps over the next year and then upgrade to 100 Mbps within 3 years.

What matters is not giving communities the fastest speeds on the planet, but giving them the right technology to hit those economic milestones that matter most to each communities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, your question points to one of the problems with DC&#8217;s fixation with speed. We subsequently lead off many discussions about broadband by comparing the US with other countries&#8217; speed. Speed for speed&#8217;s sake and/or an &#8220;arms&#8221; race with other countries miss the point.</p>
<p>For example, in a recent needs analysis I did for Benicia, CA, I asked businesses 1) what computing/business operations tasks do you want to do now, and 2) what do you want to be able to do in 3 &#8211; 5 years. Concurrently, the city told me they want to draw businesses of a certain type to the area, and one of the commercial real estate people explained from his experience what kind of speeds companies are looking for when shopping for a new location. </p>
<p>In all three cases, the focus is on what do &#8220;x&#8221; constituency/stakeholder groups want to achieve that will in turn impact economic outcomes. Then we have to figure out what speeds are going to facilitate reaching the stated objectives in the short and the long term. Some communities may be able to reach their specific objectives with 5 Mbps. Others may be able to reach them with 10 Mbps over the next year and then upgrade to 100 Mbps within 3 years.</p>
<p>What matters is not giving communities the fastest speeds on the planet, but giving them the right technology to hit those economic milestones that matter most to each communities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Levine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2010/10/16/broadband-speed-is-the-tail-wagging-the-policy-dog/#comment-299899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Levine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=166515#comment-299899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are there any studies that prove higher broadband speeds actually lead to improved economic productivity? We always talk about needing to catch up to countries like South Korea, but - admittedly, just anecdotally - I don&#039;t see a lot of world-beating technology businesses coming out of South Korea. (Although a lot start there, many of them see to stay there.) BTW, I&#039;m _certainly_ not suggesting that higher broadband speeds are useless or not worth encouraging - just asking if there&#039;s any evidence of positive economic outcomes. Can anyone help?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any studies that prove higher broadband speeds actually lead to improved economic productivity? We always talk about needing to catch up to countries like South Korea, but &#8211; admittedly, just anecdotally &#8211; I don&#8217;t see a lot of world-beating technology businesses coming out of South Korea. (Although a lot start there, many of them see to stay there.) BTW, I&#8217;m _certainly_ not suggesting that higher broadband speeds are useless or not worth encouraging &#8211; just asking if there&#8217;s any evidence of positive economic outcomes. Can anyone help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
