11 Comments

Summary:

Jeff Jonas, chief scientist at IBM Entity Analytics Group and an IBM Distinguished Engineer thinks the world has a big problem with big data and the problem is only going to get bigger. In this video he discusses the coming data tsunami and its impact.

jeffjonas

Jeff Jonas, chief scientist at IBM Entity Analytics Group and an IBM Distinguished Engineer, thinks the world has a big problem with big data and that problem is only going to get bigger. Jonas arrived at IBM after the Big Blue bought his 19-year-old company, Systems Research in January 2005. Jonas & SRD helped develop a surveillance intelligence system for Las Vegas casinos that took in reams of data to identify card counters, including the MIT grads who were made famous by best-selling book Bringing Down The House. In 2001, In-Q-Tel invested in the company and helped SRD work closely with the Central Intelligence Agency on many matters of national security.  A triathlete and a frequent Iron Man contestant, Jonas is one of the foremost authorities on data systems.

Unlike most scientists, Jonas deals with realities of modern enterprises.  He recently stopped by at our offices to discuss the data tsunami that is hitting the corporate world.  We see him as a kindred spirit. Whether it is writing about the rise of sensor nets or webscale databases, big data is an area of focus for us.

“Information is being created faster than organizations can make sense of it,” he says. The gap between the growth of information and understanding is widening because the tools for understanding are not scaling as fast as the growth in data and information.  “As computers are getting faster and the world is getting more sensors, the organizations have been getting dumber,” he said. “The percentage of what is knowable is on a decline.”

“The future doesn’t look like Tom Cruise in The Minority Report at all,” he said in the video conversation, that was produced & edited by Chris Albrecht. “The actual future is where data finds data and relevance finds the consumer.”  He talks about what we can learn from casinos and why he hates the idea of batch processing. Jonas also talks about how the big data problem is going to overrun the web as well.

Hope you enjoy the video!

Related GigaOM Pro Research (sub req’d):

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Daily Links for October 11th | Akkam's Razor Monday, October 11, 2010

    [...] Jeff Jonas Video on How Data Makes Corporations Dumb – [...]

  2. If seems as if Jeff’s data is just a bit old. He talked about the very same thing 3 years ago on a podcast by IT Conversations. http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org/shows/detail3470.html
    He might want to update his pitch. It’s 3 years old now.

    Link to mp3
    http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org/shows/detail3470.html

    1. Bill

      I would argue that the problem has gotten more acute in past three years and it is getting worse. So from that perspective, his “3” year old insight is still more valid.

  3. Mark Hernandez Monday, October 11, 2010

    That was a fantastic video.

    The takeaway is that given the increasing amount of existing and new kinds of information coming in, unless a miracle occurs…

    …there’s no escaping the need to have someone like Jeff Jonas on your staff who is the Chief Information Expert and takes responsibility for double-checking and second-guessing the existing and new interpretations of your data, constantly looking for gotchas and blind spots. Computers cannot do what humans do.

    How can you integrate such wisdom into your automated information systems without having someone on your staff who has that wisdom in the first place? If you’re getting bad data, then the basic problem couldn’t be more obvious!

    —-

    Likewise there’s a stream of another kind of information coming at us and GigaOM wants to be there to help us interpret it, add value and even wants to charge for a subscription to that added value. This is why I truly hope that there’s a “Chief Writing Officer” at GigaOM who takes responsibilitly for the quality of writing, sets the minimum standards and exercises quality control.

    The quality of writing on GigaOM is definitely inconsistent, and sometimes quite poor (e.g. D.E.) generated by writers who exhibit unprofessionalism, poor critical thinking and expository writing skills, a tendency toward sensationalism, and writing that’s obviously just banged out to fill the RSS streams parroting other sites.

    A Chief Writing Officer would know that GigaOM is not the only stream people read, and if it wants to stand out and offer exceptional value, it has to produce original thoughtful content that can take hours and hours of careful work and research to produce. Asymco.com is one example of a quality to strive for. The C.W.O. knows that consistency is key, that it takes a long time to build respect and takes just minutes to damage it. It’s either all high quality, or it’s only as good as it’s weakest offering.

    If GigaOM wants to be in between the industry and it’s readers, it wants to make sure it double-checks and second-guesses it’s output and takes a lesson from Jeff Jonas, if needed.

    Information is being transmitted here through the conduit of writing. And if it’s bad, the problem couldn’t be more obvious.

    Mark Hernandez
    Information Workshop

  4. Matthew Hardy Monday, October 11, 2010

    Really stellar stuff. Thank you for this post — I think I’ll watch the video once a week for a while.

  5. Did I miss it, or doesn’t he cover machine learning. Without it, good luck. His example of counting is a good example why there should be machine learning, as in self organization.

    1. He does talk about machine learning where he says “data finds data and relevance finds the consumer.”

      1. He talks about organizational learning but not specifically about machine learning. Now one can interpret organizational learning both ways, to me seems he’s talking about pretty conventional system.
        Can you ask him next time about machine learning?

        Ref:
        http://jeffjonas.typepad.com/jeff_jonas/2009/07/data-finds-data.html
        http://jeffjonas.typepad.com/jeff_jonas/2006/06/you_wont_have_t.html
        http://jeffjonas.typepad.com/jeff_jonas/2006/02/what_do_you_kno.html

  6. Bookmarks for October 11th through October 15th Friday, October 15, 2010

    [...] Jeff Jonas Video on How Data Makes Corporations Dumb: Tech News « – “Information is being created faster than organizations can make sense of it,” he says. The gap between the growth of information and understanding is widening because the tools for understanding are not scaling as fast as the growth in data and information.  “As computers are getting faster and the world is getting more sensors, the organizations have been getting dumber,” he said. “The percentage of what is knowable is on a decline.” [...]

  7. From Big Data to Big Bicycles: 5 Must-See GigaOM TV Videos: Tech News « Wednesday, October 27, 2010

    [...] IBM’s Jeff Jonas: What can tech companies learn from Vegas casinos? Understanding data in real… [...]

  8. Human Attention, How Can I Direct You? « rejuvenati0n Wednesday, February 16, 2011

    [...] Jonas works for IBM Entity Analytics Group as a chief scientist. I watched his video on How Data Makes Corporations Dumb in my social media class today. I thought I would share some points since he has some interesting [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post